• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validating the Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP(A)) tool in adult intensive care units.验证成人重症监护病房中服务提供者护理过程测量工具(MPOC-SP(A))
South Afr J Crit Care. 2025 May 19;41(1):e2662. doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2025.v411.2662. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Content Validity of a Modified Italian Version of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale for ICU Patients.杰克逊/库宾重症监护病房患者压力性损伤风险评估量表改良意大利语版的翻译、文化调适及内容效度
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(7):256. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070256.
6
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
Development and validation of tool to assess respectful maternity care practices among healthcare providers.评估医疗服务提供者中尊重孕产妇护理实践的工具的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1007. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13155-0.
8
Development and validation of a novel self-assessment tool for breastfeeding mothers.一种针对母乳喂养母亲的新型自我评估工具的开发与验证
Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Apr 3;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13006-025-00715-7.
9
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
10
Development and content validity testing of a colonoscopy-specific patient-reported experience measure: the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale (PECS).开发并对结肠镜检查特异性患者报告体验量表(PECS)进行内容效度检验。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 18;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00710-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Family-Centered Care Assessment Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation in a Turkish Sample.家庭为中心的护理评估量表:土耳其样本的开发和心理测量评估。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2019 Sep-Oct;48:e35-e41. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
2
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
3
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
Performance of the measures of processes of care for adults and service providers in rehabilitation settings.康复机构中针对成年人及服务提供者的照护流程措施的执行情况。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015 Jun 8;6:157-65. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S81361. eCollection 2015.
5
Measurement of family-centered care in the neonatal intensive care unit and professional background.
J Perinatol. 2015 Apr;35(4):284-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.204. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
6
Validity, internal consistency reliability and one-year stability of the Slovene translation of the Measure of Processes of Care (20-item version).《护理过程量表》(20项版本)斯洛文尼亚语译本的效度、内部一致性信度及一年稳定性
Child Care Health Dev. 2015 Jul;41(4):569-80. doi: 10.1111/cch.12198. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
7
Use of the Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20) to evaluate health service delivery for children with cerebral palsy and their families in Jordan: validation of Arabic-translated version (AR-MPOC-20).使用医疗服务过程评估量表(MPOC-20)评估约旦脑瘫患儿及其家庭的医疗服务提供情况:阿拉伯语翻译版本(AR-MPOC-20)的验证
Child Care Health Dev. 2014 Sep;40(5):680-8. doi: 10.1111/cch.12116.
8
Evaluation of family-centred practices in the early intervention programmes for infants and young children in Singapore with Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers and Measure of Beliefs about Participation in Family-Centred Service.采用《服务提供者护理过程测量量表》和《关于参与家庭中心服务的信念测量量表》对新加坡婴幼儿早期干预项目中的家庭中心实践进行评估。
Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Jan;38(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01259.x. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
9
Validation of the measure of processes of care for adults: a measure of client-centred care.成人护理流程测量的验证:以客户为中心的护理测量。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Aug;22(4):302-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq031. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
10
Development of a measure of family-centred care for resource-poor South African settings: the experience of using a modified version of the MPOC-20.为资源匮乏的南非环境开发以家庭为中心的护理衡量标准:使用MPOC - 20修订版的经验
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Jan;35(1):23-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00914.x. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

验证成人重症监护病房中服务提供者护理过程测量工具(MPOC-SP(A))

Validating the Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP(A)) tool in adult intensive care units.

作者信息

Oghenetega C O N, Chetty S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

South Afr J Crit Care. 2025 May 19;41(1):e2662. doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2025.v411.2662. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.7196/SAJCC.2025.v411.2662
PMID:40927446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12416925/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Measures of Process of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP(A)) tool, developed by the CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research in Canada, assesses service providers' perceptions of family-centred care (FCC) in adult rehabilitation. It consists of 27 items categorised into four domains: 'showing interpersonal sensitivity', 'providing general information', 'communicating specific information', and 'treating people respectfully'. Each domain encompasses a distinct aspect of family-centred care applicable in the intensive care unit (ICU). An earlier version of the tool was previously validated for use in neonatal ICUs. However, this tool has not been validated for use in adult ICUs.

OBJECTIVES

To validate the content validity index of the MPOC-SP(A) tool for healthcare professionals working in adult ICUs in South Africa.

METHODS

Following approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee, a multidisciplinary group of experienced ICU healthcare professionals was invited to review the MPOC-SP(A) tool, rating each item's relevance on a four-point scale to avoid neutrality. The content validity index (CVI) was calculated for each item (I-CVI) and domain (S-CVI/Ave) using Microsoft Excel. An I-CVI of 0.83 and S-CVI/Ave of 0.9 were deemed acceptable. Items with a CVI below 0.83 were discarded.

RESULTS

The scale-level CVI (S-CVI/Ave) for every domain was 0.9 and above, which is acceptable. Two items in domain A and one item in domain B were deleted owing to low I-CVI values. Two items were revised to improve the item's clarity. Thus, a 24-item MPOC-SP(A) tool applicable to adult ICUs was generated following the content validity analysis.

CONCLUSION

The content experts' assessment of the instrument's items is essential to ensure its validity. This study has finalised the content validation process of the MPOC-SP(A) tool for use in the adult ICU. The refined tool is now ready for the next phase of validation focusing on construct and internal consistency.

CONTRIBUTION OF THE STUDY

This study contributes to the field of research by providing robust evidence for the content validity of the MPOC-SP(A) tool in adult ICU settings, supporting its relevance, clarity, and comprehensiveness for measuring family-centred care practices. It also offers a framework for future validation studies in similar resource-limited healthcare contexts.

摘要

背景

由加拿大CanChild儿童残疾研究中心开发的《服务提供者护理过程测量工具(MPOC-SP(A))》评估服务提供者对成人康复中以家庭为中心的护理(FCC)的看法。它由27个项目组成,分为四个领域:“表现出人际敏感性”、“提供一般信息”、“传达具体信息”和“尊重他人”。每个领域都涵盖了适用于重症监护病房(ICU)的以家庭为中心的护理的一个独特方面。该工具的早期版本先前已在新生儿重症监护病房得到验证。然而,该工具尚未在成人重症监护病房得到验证。

目的

验证《服务提供者护理过程测量工具(MPOC-SP(A))》在南非成人重症监护病房工作的医护人员中的内容效度指数。

方法

在获得人类研究伦理委员会批准后,邀请了一组多学科的经验丰富的重症监护病房医护人员对《服务提供者护理过程测量工具(MPOC-SP(A))》进行审查,以四分制对每个项目的相关性进行评分,以避免中立。使用Microsoft Excel计算每个项目的内容效度指数(I-CVI)和每个领域的内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)。I-CVI为0.83且S-CVI/Ave为0.9被认为是可接受的。内容效度指数低于0.83的项目被舍弃。

结果

每个领域的量表级内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)均为0.9及以上,这是可接受的。由于I-CVI值较低,领域A中的两个项目和领域B中的一个项目被删除。对两个项目进行了修订以提高项目的清晰度。因此,经过内容效度分析后,生成了一个适用于成人重症监护病房的24项《服务提供者护理过程测量工具(MPOC-SP(A))》。

结论

内容专家对工具项目的评估对于确保其效度至关重要。本研究完成了《服务提供者护理过程测量工具(MPOC-SP(A))》在成人重症监护病房使用的内容效度验证过程。经过改进的工具现在已准备好进入下一阶段的验证,重点是结构效度和内部一致性。

研究贡献

本研究通过为《服务提供者护理过程测量工具(MPOC-SP(A))》在成人重症监护病房环境中的内容效度提供有力证据,为研究领域做出了贡献,支持了其在测量以家庭为中心的护理实践方面的相关性、清晰度和全面性。它还为未来在类似资源有限的医疗环境中的验证研究提供了一个框架。