Tang H N, Chong W H, Goh W, Chan W P, Choo S
Department of Child Development, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Jan;38(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01259.x. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
The primary purpose of this study was to report on an evaluation of the perceptions and beliefs of service providers towards family-centred practices in 11 early intervention programmes for infants and young children in Singapore.
The Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP) and Measure of Beliefs about Participation in Family-Centred Service (MBP-FCS) were administered to 213 service providers made up of teachers, therapists, psychologists and social workers providing centre-based therapy to children with special needs who were below the age of 6 years.
Exploratory factor analyses were performed with both scales. Nineteen of the 27 MPOC-SP items were retained and supported the original four-factor structure model. The exploratory factor analyses on MBP-FCS provided a less satisfactory outcome. Fourteen of the 28 items were retained and these loaded onto four factors. The two factors relating to Beliefs about benefits of FCS and Beliefs about the absence of negative outcomes from FCS failed to emerge as separate factors. Further multiple regressions indicated that more direct work with families and positive self-efficacy in implementing FCS contributed significantly to explaining service providers' positive perception towards family-centred practice in service delivery.
This is the first time MPOC-SP and MBP-FCS were administered to a population in an Asian context. While MBP-FCS would benefit from further development work on its construct, MPOC-SP offered important insights into service providers' perspectives about family-centred practices that would have useful implications for professional and service development.
本研究的主要目的是报告对新加坡11个婴幼儿早期干预项目中服务提供者对以家庭为中心的实践的看法和信念的评估。
对213名服务提供者进行了《服务提供者护理过程量表》(MPOC-SP)和《参与以家庭为中心服务的信念量表》(MBP-FCS)的测试,这些服务提供者包括教师、治疗师、心理学家和社会工作者,他们为6岁以下有特殊需求的儿童提供中心治疗。
对两个量表都进行了探索性因素分析。MPOC-SP的27个项目中有19个被保留,并支持了原来的四因素结构模型。对MBP-FCS的探索性因素分析结果不太理想。28个项目中有14个被保留,这些项目加载到四个因素上。与以家庭为中心的服务的益处信念和以家庭为中心的服务无负面结果信念相关的两个因素未能作为单独的因素出现。进一步的多元回归表明,与家庭的更直接合作以及实施以家庭为中心的服务的积极自我效能感对解释服务提供者在服务提供中对以家庭为中心的实践的积极看法有显著贡献。
这是首次在亚洲背景下对人群使用MPOC-SP和MBP-FCS。虽然MBP-FCS在其结构上需要进一步的开发工作,但MPOC-SP为服务提供者对以家庭为中心的实践的观点提供了重要见解,这对专业和服务发展具有有益的启示。