Suppr超能文献

肺活量测定和单次呼吸气体交换测量在识别低肺总量方面的效用。

The utility of spirometry and single breath gas transfer measurements to identify low total lung capacity.

作者信息

Knox-Brown Ben, Alexiou Chara, Stanojevic Sanja, Sylvester Karl P

机构信息

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2025 Sep 8;11(5). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00038-2025. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Measurement of total lung capacity (TLC) requires large and expensive equipment. We aimed to investigate whether spirometric restriction and low alveolar volume measured by single breath gas transfer ( ) can be used to identify those with a low TLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from adults referred to Cambridge University Hospitals between January 2016 and December 2023. We investigated the utility of spirometric restriction (forced vital capacity (FVC) < lower limit of normal (LLN) with forced expiratory volume in 1 s /FVC ≥LLN) and reduced (<LLN), to discriminate low TLC measured by plethysmography (TLC <LLN). We assessed agreement between definitions using the Cohen's kappa coefficient and the discriminative ability of spirometric restriction and reduced to identify TLC <LLN.

RESULTS

Data from 7923 patients were included. The majority (94%) of patients were of European ancestry, 51% were female. Mean age was 58 years. 11% of patients had a TLC <LLN, of which 27% also had spirometric restriction, and 95% had a <LLN. Agreement between spirometric restriction and TLC <LLN was fair (κ=0.37). Spirometric restriction had low sensitivity (27%) but high specificity (99%) for discriminating TLC <LLN. Agreement between <LLN and TLC <LLN was substantial (κ=0.63). <LLN had good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (89%) for discriminating TLC <LLN, except for in patients with the most severe airflow obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

A FVC in the healthy range is an effective tool for ruling out restriction. Low can be used to accurately identify those with a low TLC, negating the need for formal measurement of static lung volumes when identifying restrictive lung disease.

摘要

背景

测量肺总量(TLC)需要大型且昂贵的设备。我们旨在研究通过单次呼吸气体交换测量的肺量计限制和低肺泡容积是否可用于识别肺总量低的患者。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2023年12月期间转诊至剑桥大学医院的成人患者数据。我们研究了肺量计限制(用力肺活量(FVC)<正常下限(LLN)且1秒用力呼气量/FVC≥LLN)和降低的单次呼吸气体交换(<LLN)用于鉴别通过体积描记法测量的低肺总量(TLC<LLN)的效用。我们使用科恩kappa系数评估定义之间的一致性以及肺量计限制和降低的单次呼吸气体交换鉴别TLC<LLN的判别能力。

结果

纳入了7923例患者的数据。大多数(94%)患者为欧洲血统,51%为女性。平均年龄为58岁。11%的患者TLC<LLN,其中27%同时存在肺量计限制,95%的患者单次呼吸气体交换<LLN。肺量计限制与TLC<LLN之间的一致性为中等(κ=0.37)。肺量计限制在鉴别TLC<LLN时敏感性低(27%)但特异性高(99%)。单次呼吸气体交换<LLN与TLC<LLN之间的一致性为高度一致(κ=0.63)。单次呼吸气体交换<LLN在鉴别TLC<LLN时具有良好的敏感性(95%)和特异性(89%),最严重气流受限的患者除外。

结论

处于健康范围内的FVC是排除限制的有效工具。低单次呼吸气体交换可用于准确识别肺总量低的患者,在识别限制性肺病时无需正式测量静态肺容积。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2ec/12415716/db7a3b402bdd/00038-2025.01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验