Guan Yu, Liu Qian, Deng Zhimin, Liu Sirui, Liang Jia, Zou Yujie, Yin Tailang, Tang Dongdong, Liu Jue, Zhang Yan
Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Hum Reprod Open. 2025 Aug 18;2025(3):hoaf050. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaf050. eCollection 2025.
Do social determinants of health (SDoH) influence the age at menopause among women?
In our study, adverse SDoH, particularly family low income-to-poverty ratio (PIR), low education level, and the marital status of being widowed, are associated with earlier age at menopause.
Some prior studies have considered certain SDoH variables (such as educational attainment and marital status) as potential factors influencing age at menopause, but systematic evidence clearly defining the relationship between multidimensional SDoH and menopausal age remains lacking.
This cross-sectional analysis included 6083 naturally menopausal women from 10 cycles (1999-2018) of the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and excluded cases of surgical menopause.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: The participants were derived from a nationally representative sample of the NHANES 1999-2018 in the USA. Eight SDoH variables were assessed: employment, PIR, food security, education, healthcare access, health insurance, housing stability, and marital status. Age at menopause was determined by self-reported last menstrual period among women with natural menopause. This study constructed weighted multivariate linear regression models and weighted quantile sum (WQS) analyses and calculated regression coefficients (β) and their 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were used to verify the robustness of our findings.
After adjusting for relevant confounding factors, adverse PIR, education level, and marital status (such as being widowed) were significantly associated with earlier age at menopause. Specifically, compared to women with a PIR ≥500%, women with a PIR between 100% and 300% or PIR ≤100% had an earlier age at menopause by 0.877 years (95% CI: -1.526, -0.229, = 0.008) and 1.296 years (95% CI: -2.105, -0.487, = 0.002), respectively. Additionally, compared to women with an educational level of college or above, women with a high school education or less than a high school education had earlier age at menopause by 1.262 years (High school: 95% CI = -1.914, -0.609, < 0.001) and 1.403 years (Less than high school: 95% CI = -2.062, -0.743, < 0.001), respectively. Compared to women who were married or living with a partner, widowed women had earlier age at menopause by 1.363 years (95% CI = -1.887, -0.839, < 0.001). Analysis using a WQS regression model based on decile categorization demonstrated that each 1-unit increase in the composite exposure index of adverse SDoH factors was associated with 3.302 years earlier age at menopause in women (95% CI = -4.129, -2.476, < 0.001). The PIR contributed most substantially to the inverse association between SDoH and age at menopause.
The cross-sectional design limits causal inference. Unmeasured confounders (e.g. parity, previous hormone use, chemical exposures) and recall bias may persist despite sensitivity analyses.
These findings substantiate the implementation of integrated multidimensional interventions targeting economic stability, housing security, employment support, and healthcare access, which would likely yield substantially greater benefits than single-dimensional policy adjustments. Moreover, material deprivation factors may exert profoundly stronger effects on reproductive aging than previously thought.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2705700), the Interdisciplinary Innovative Talents Foundation from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (JCRCYG-2022-009), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72474005). All authors declare no competing interests.
N/A.
健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)是否会影响女性的绝经年龄?
在我们的研究中,不良的社会决定因素,尤其是家庭低收入与贫困率(PIR)、低教育水平以及丧偶的婚姻状况,与绝经年龄提前有关。
一些先前的研究已将某些社会决定因素变量(如教育程度和婚姻状况)视为影响绝经年龄的潜在因素,但仍缺乏明确界定多维社会决定因素与绝经年龄之间关系的系统性证据。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这项横断面分析纳入了来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)10个周期(1999 - 2018年)的6083名自然绝经女性,并排除了手术绝经的病例。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:参与者来自美国1999 - 2018年全国代表性的NHANES样本。评估了8个社会决定因素变量:就业、PIR、食品安全、教育、医疗保健可及性、健康保险、住房稳定性和婚姻状况。绝经年龄由自然绝经女性自我报告的末次月经确定。本研究构建了加权多元线性回归模型和加权分位数和(WQS)分析,并计算了回归系数(β)及其95%置信区间。采用亚组分析和敏感性分析来验证研究结果的稳健性。
在调整相关混杂因素后,不良的PIR、教育水平和婚姻状况(如丧偶)与绝经年龄提前显著相关。具体而言,与PIR≥500%的女性相比,PIR在100%至300%之间或PIR≤100%的女性绝经年龄分别提前0.877年(95%置信区间:-1.52, -0.229,P = 0.008)和1.296年(95%置信区间:-2.105, -0.487,P = 0.002)。此外,与大学及以上教育水平的女性相比,高中教育水平或高中以下教育水平的女性绝经年龄分别提前1.(高中:95%置信区间 = -1.914, -0.609,P < 0.)和1.403年(高中以下:95%置信区间 = -2.062, -0.743,P < 0.001)。与已婚或与伴侣同住的女性相比,丧偶女性绝经年龄提前1.363年(95%置信区间 = -1.887, -0.839,P < 0.001)。基于十分位数分类的WQS回归模型分析表明,不良社会决定因素因素的综合暴露指数每增加1个单位,女性绝经年龄提前3.302年(95%置信区间 = -4.129, -2.476,P < 0.001)。PIR对社会决定因素与绝经年龄之间负相关的贡献最大。
局限性、谨慎的原因:横断面设计限制了因果推断。尽管进行了敏感性分析,但未测量的混杂因素(如产次、既往激素使用、化学物质暴露)和回忆偏倚可能仍然存在。
这些发现证实了实施针对经济稳定、住房保障、就业支持和医疗保健可及性的综合多维干预措施的必要性,这可能比单维政策调整产生更大的益处。此外,物质匮乏因素对生殖衰老的影响可能比以前认为的更强。
研究资金/利益冲突:这项工作得到了中国国家重点研发计划(2023YFC2705700)、武汉大学人民医院跨学科创新人才基金(JCRCYG - 2022 - 009)和中国国家自然科学基金(72474005)的支持。所有作者均声明无利益冲突。
无。