Suppr超能文献

基于虚拟现实的正念干预的经验与用户认知:系统评价与主题综合方案

Experiences and user perceptions of virtual-reality-based mindfulness interventions: protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis.

作者信息

Shankar Ravi, Bundele Anjali, Yap Amanda, Mukhopadhyay Amartya

机构信息

Medical Affairs - Research Innovation & Enterprise, Alexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore

Medical Affairs - Research Innovation & Enterprise, Alexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 9;15(9):e094876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094876.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Virtual reality (VR) technology is increasingly being explored as a medium for delivering mindfulness-based interventions. While studies have investigated the feasibility and efficacy of VR-based mindfulness interventions, there has been limited synthesis of user experiences and perceptions across diverse applications, hindering the iterative refinement of these technologies and limiting evidence-based guidance for effective deployment in real-world settings. This systematic review aims to comprehensively identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative research on end-user experiences and perceptions of VR-based mindfulness interventions. Understanding user experiences is critical for translating research findings into practical design improvements and implementation strategies that enhance intervention effectiveness and user adoption.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus from inception to present. Studies reporting qualitative data on adult participants' experiences, perceptions, attitudes or opinions related to VR-based mindfulness interventions will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data and assess methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Thematic synthesis will be used to analyse the qualitative data. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approach will be applied to assess confidence in the review findings.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required as this review will be based on published studies. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024594330.

摘要

引言

虚拟现实(VR)技术越来越多地被探索作为一种提供基于正念干预的媒介。虽然已有研究调查了基于VR的正念干预的可行性和有效性,但对于不同应用中用户体验和看法的综合分析有限,这阻碍了这些技术的迭代改进,并限制了在现实环境中有效部署的循证指导。本系统评价旨在全面识别、评估和综合关于最终用户对基于VR的正念干预的体验和看法的定性研究。了解用户体验对于将研究结果转化为实际设计改进和实施策略至关重要,这些改进和策略可提高干预效果和用户接受度。

方法与分析

将在PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、PsycINFO和Scopus中进行从创刊至今的系统检索。纳入报告成年参与者与基于VR的正念干预相关的体验、看法、态度或意见的定性数据的研究。两名独立评审员将筛选研究、提取数据并使用批判性评价技能计划清单评估方法学质量。将采用主题综合法分析定性数据。将应用推荐评估、制定和评价-定性研究综述证据的可信度方法来评估对综述结果的信心。

伦理与传播

由于本综述将基于已发表的研究,因此无需伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物和会议报告进行传播。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024594330。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5154/12421610/21bef6dc0940/bmjopen-15-9-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验