Yang Di, Feng Yun, Guo XuBin, Hu Pei
Geely University of China, Chengdu, China.
China West Normal University, Nanchong, China.
J Sports Sci Med. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):513-521. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.513. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Research comparing the effects of different small-sided soccer game (SSG) training formats on physical adaptations remains scarce. This study aimed to compare small-format SSGs (SSG: 1v1 to 3v3) with large-format SSGs (SSG: 6v6 to 8v8) on vertical jump, change-of-direction (COD), linear speed and aerobic capacity adaptations in youth female soccer players over a six-week training period. Using a simple randomized, parallel, controlled design, players were assigned to one of two experimental groups (SSG or SSG) or a control group. Forty-five female youth players (15.7 ± 0.5 years old) competing at a developmental level participated in the study. All participants had a minimum of two years of playing experience and adhered to at least 90% of the intervention protocol. The experimental groups received two additional SSG sessions per week, while the control group maintained their regular training routines. Baseline and post-intervention assessments included countermovement jump height (CMJ), change of direction deficit in the 5-0-5 test (COD deficit), 30-meter linear speed, and final velocity in the 30-15 intermittent fitness test (VIFT). The SSG group exhibited a significantly smaller CODdeficit compared to the control group ( = 0.026; = 1.032, moderate) after the intervention. The SSG group exhibited a significantly smaller 30-m sprint time compared to the control group ( = 0.044; = 0.303, small). Both the SSG ( = 0.039; = 0.880, moderate) and SSG ( = 0.026; = 1.043, moderate) groups exhibited a significantly greater V compared to the control group. In conclusion, the findings suggest that SSG may be more beneficial for improving COD ability, while SSG could potentially be more effective for enhancing linear sprint performance. Both formats appear to have a positive impact on aerobic performance, though the extent of their effects might be similar. Coaches might consider these differences when selecting SSG formats, as each format could contribute differently to physical performance adaptations.
比较不同小场地足球比赛(SSG)训练形式对身体适应性影响的研究仍然很少。本研究旨在比较小场地SSG(SSG:1对1至3对3)和大场地SSG(SSG:6对6至8对8)对青年女子足球运动员在六周训练期内垂直跳跃、变向(COD)、直线速度和有氧能力适应性的影响。采用简单随机、平行、对照设计,将运动员分配到两个实验组(SSG或SSG)之一或一个对照组。45名处于发展水平的青年女子足球运动员(15.7±0.5岁)参与了该研究。所有参与者至少有两年的比赛经验,并至少遵守了90%的干预方案。实验组每周额外进行两次SSG训练,而对照组维持其常规训练安排。基线和干预后评估包括反向移动跳跃高度(CMJ)、5-0-5测试中的变向缺陷(COD缺陷)、30米直线速度以及30-15间歇体能测试中的最终速度(VIFT)。干预后,SSG组的COD缺陷比对照组显著更小(P = 0.026;ES = 1.032,中等)。SSG组的30米短跑时间比对照组显著更短(P = 0.044;ES = 0.303,小)。SSG组(P = 0.039;ES = 0.880,中等)和SSG组(P = 0.026;ES = 1.043,中等)的V均比对照组显著更高。总之,研究结果表明,小场地SSG可能对提高COD能力更有益,而大场地SSG可能对提高直线短跑成绩更有效。两种形式似乎对有氧能力都有积极影响,尽管其影响程度可能相似。教练在选择SSG形式时可能会考虑这些差异,因为每种形式对身体性能适应性的贡献可能不同。