Song Jingru, Wu Junxian, Yu Jing, Li Lin, Zhang Mingfang, Shen Qin
School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Liver and gallbladder surgery, Jiaxing First Hospital, Jiaxing, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 11;20(9):e0332077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332077. eCollection 2025.
The aim of this study is to identify the latent profiles of reflective ability in clinical nurses and examine their association with dual work stress.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted using convenience sampling between October 2023 and January 2024. Clinical nurses from three tertiary general hospitals in Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, were recruited for the study. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Clinical Nurses' Reflective Capacity Scale, and the Dual Work Stress Scale. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify distinct reflective capacity profiles. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were employed to examine influencing factors.
A total of 843 nurses participated in the study, with a mean reflective capacity score of 56.15 ± 19.39. Four latent profiles were identified: Low-Level Negative Type (65.0%), High-Recall Insightful Type (7.0%), Low-Recall Introspective Type (4.0%), and High-Level Balanced Type (24.0%). Logistic regression analysis showed that challenge stress, hindrance stress, gender, professional title, participation in reflection training, the habit of keeping a reflective journal, and job satisfaction were significant factors influencing the latent profiles of reflective capacity (P < 0.05).
Reflective capacity among clinical nurses exhibits heterogeneity, with four distinct latent profiles identified. Nursing managers should tailor interventions based on the influencing factors of different profiles to enhance reflective capacity in clinical nurses.
本研究旨在识别临床护士反思能力的潜在类型,并探讨其与双重工作压力的关联。
采用便利抽样法于2023年10月至2024年1月进行横断面调查。招募了浙江省嘉兴市三家三级综合医院的临床护士参与研究。使用一般信息问卷、临床护士反思能力量表和双重工作压力量表收集数据。采用潜在剖面分析(LPA)来识别不同的反思能力类型。采用单因素分析和逻辑回归分析来检验影响因素。
共有843名护士参与研究,反思能力平均得分为56.15±19.39。识别出四种潜在类型:低水平消极型(65.0%)、高回忆洞察型(7.0%)、低回忆内省型(4.0%)和高水平平衡型(24.0%)。逻辑回归分析表明,挑战性压力、阻碍性压力、性别、职称、参与反思培训、撰写反思日记的习惯和工作满意度是影响反思能力潜在类型的重要因素(P<0.05)。
临床护士的反思能力存在异质性,识别出四种不同的潜在类型。护理管理者应根据不同类型的影响因素制定干预措施,以提高临床护士的反思能力。