Chow Junwei, Lim Woonling, Li Longzhou, Yu Qiuxia, Zhong Yu, Wang Zihan, Shah Syed Alfakhar Ali, Zhu Chenyang, Yan Shiwei, Liu Haiyang, Hu Xinyi, Gao Long, Wang Shan, Liu Jun, Ma Guo
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Drug Formulations for Overcoming Delivery Barriers, Fudan University, 826 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.
Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, 801 Heqing Road, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s40618-025-02655-9.
Imeglimin (Imeg), a novel oral antidiabetic drug that acts as a mitochondrial modulator and targets multiple metabolic pathways, offers a novel therapeutic option for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although both Imeg and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), their comparative clinical benefits remain uncertain. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of Imeg and DPP-4i in the treatment of T2DM using Bayesian network meta-analysis (BNMA).
PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to 1 October, 2024. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of Imeg or DPP-4i with placebo or other antidiabetic drugs in treating T2DM were included. The primary efficacy outcomes included changes in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hours postprandial plasma glucose (2h PPG), as well as the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7%. The secondary efficacy outcomes included changes in body weight (BW), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β), and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). The safety outcomes included the proportion of participants with adverse events, infection, and gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs).
145 studies with 71,476 participants were included in the BNMA. Imeg 500 mg,1000 mg, 1500 mg and 2000 mg BID all exhibited significant efficacy in reducing HbA1c compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)], -0.29 [-0.51, -0.06] %, -0.67 [-0.83, -0.51] %, -0.73 [-0.90, -0.56] %, and - 0.63 [-0.95, -0.30] %, respectively). Compared to placebo, the majority of DPP-4i (except for Gosogliptin (Goso) 2 mg QD (MD [95% CI], -0.32 [-0.73, 0.09] %), Omarigliptin 0.25 mg QW (-0.26 [-0.54, 0.01] %), and Sitagliptin (Sita) 5 mg BID (-0.24 [-0.50, 0.01] %)) demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing HbA1c. Compared to the FDA-approved DPP-4i, i.e., Sita 100 mg QD, Saxagliptin 5 mg QD, Linagliptin 5 mg QD, and Alogliptin (Alog) 25 mg QD, Imeg showed no significant differences in glycemic control. Compared to placebo, Alog 50 mg QD (MD [95% CI], -11.15 [-19.99, -2.48] mg/dL), Alog 25 mg QD (-6.11 [-10.33, -2.07] mg/dL), and Alog 12.5 mg QD (-5.53 [-9.72, -1.49] mg/dL) exhibited notable total cholesterol-lowering effects. Compared to placebo, only Alog 50 mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.91 [1.02, 3.28]) and Goso 30 mg QD (2.14 [1.07, 3.86]) exhibited a higher incidence of adverse events. Compared to placebo, only Imeg 500 mg BID was associated with a significantly increased risk of infection (OR [95% CI], 2.30 [1.01, 4.61]). Compared to placebo, Imeg 1500 mg BID (OR [95% CI], 2.74 [1.09, 5.78]), Sita 100 mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.36 [1.02, 1.75]) and Vildagliptin 50 mg BID (1.50 [1.06, 2.06]) were associated with a significantly increased risk of GIAEs. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, among the included DPP-4i, 20 mg QD and 40 mg QD of Teneligliptin (Tene) demonstrated significant efficacy in lowering HbA1c (73.08% and 84.8%, respectively) and 2h PPG (68.05% and 79.24%, respectively). Alog 25 mg QD was identified as the most effective DPP-4i for increasing the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7% (91.07%).
Imeg and DPP-4i demonstrated favorable antidiabetic effects and good safety. Imeg exhibited comparable glycemic control to that of DPP-4i. Overall, Alog was the most suitable option among the included DPP-4i for T2DM patients with hyperlipidemia. Tene demonstrated significant efficacy in glycemic control, and can be a first-line choice among the included DPP-4i.
依美格列明(Imeg)是一种新型口服抗糖尿病药物,作为线粒体调节剂,作用于多个代谢途径,为2型糖尿病(T2DM)提供了一种新的治疗选择。尽管依美格列明和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)均可增强葡萄糖刺激的胰岛素分泌(GSIS),但其相对临床益处仍不确定。因此,我们使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(BNMA)全面评估并比较了依美格列明和DPP-4i治疗T2DM的疗效和安全性。
系统检索了PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索时间从数据库建立至2024年10月1日。纳入比较依美格列明或DPP-4i与安慰剂或其他抗糖尿病药物治疗T2DM疗效和安全性的随机临床试验(RCT)。主要疗效指标包括糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2小时血糖(2h PPG)的变化,以及HbA1c<7%的参与者比例。次要疗效指标包括体重(BW)、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、甘油三酯、β细胞功能稳态模型评估(HOMA-β)和胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)的变化。安全性指标包括发生不良事件、感染和胃肠道不良事件(GIAEs)的参与者比例。
BNMA纳入了145项研究,共71476名参与者。与安慰剂相比时,依美格列明500mg、1000mg、1500mg和2000mg每日两次(BID)在降低HbA1c方面均显示出显著疗效(平均差值(MD)[95%置信区间(CI)]分别为-0.29[-0.51,-0.06]%、-0.67[-0.83,-0.51]%、-0.73[-0.90,-0.56]%和-0.63[-0.95,-0.30]%)。与安慰剂相比时,大多数DPP-4i(除了2mg每日一次(QD)的戈格列汀(Goso)(MD[95%CI],-0.32[-0.73,0.09]%)、0.25mg每周一次(QW)的奥马格列汀(-0.26[-0.54,0.01]%)和5mg BID的西他列汀(Sita)(-0.24[-0.50,0.01]%))在降低HbA1c方面显示出显著疗效。与美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的DPP-4i,即100mg QD的西他列汀、5mg QD的沙格列汀、5mg QD的利格列汀和25mg QD的阿格列汀(Alog)相比,依美格列明在血糖控制方面无显著差异。与安慰剂相比时,25mg QD的阿格列汀(MD[95%CI],-11.15[-19.99,-2.48]mg/dL)、12.5mg QD的阿格列汀(-6.11[-10.33,-2.07]mg/dL)和6.25mg QD的阿格列汀(-5.53[-9.72,-1.49]mg/dL)显示出显著的降低总胆固醇的作用。与安慰剂相比时,只有25mg QD的阿格列汀(OR[95%CI],1.91[1.02,3.28])和30mg QD的戈格列汀(2.14[1.07,3.86])不良事件发生率较高。与安慰剂相比时,只有500mg BID的依美格列明感染风险显著增加(OR[95%CI],2.30[1.01,4.61])。与安慰剂相比时,1500mg BID的依美格列明(OR[95%CI],2.74[1.09,5.78])、100mg QD的西他列汀(OR[95%CI],1.36[1.02,1.75])和50mg BID的维格列汀(1.50[1.06,2.06])胃肠道不良事件风险显著增加。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值,在纳入的DPP-4i中,20mg QD和40mg QD的替格列汀(Tene)在降低HbA1c(分别为73.08%和84.8%)和2h PPG(分别为68.05%和79.24%)方面显示出显著疗效。25mg QD的阿格列汀被确定为增加HbA1c<7%参与者比例最有效的DPP-4i(91.07%)。
依美格列明和DPP-4i显示出良好的抗糖尿病作用和安全性。依美格列明的血糖控制效果与DPP-相比具有可比性。总体而言,对于合并高脂血症的T2DM患者,阿格列汀是纳入的DPP-4i中最合适的选择。替格列汀在血糖控制方面显示出显著疗效,可作为纳入的DPP-4i中的一线选择。