Suppr超能文献

一例需要内固定的寰枢椎旋转固定病例。

A Case of Atlanto-Axial Rotatory Fixation Requiring Internal Fixation.

作者信息

Fukushi Ryunosuke, Takeshita Yujiro, Morita Tomonori, Fujita Hiroki, Tachibana Shunsuke, Teramoto Atsushi

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic and Spine Surgery, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama-Shi, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Sep;15(9):234-239. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.6082.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Most cases of atlanto-axial rotatory fixation (AARF) respond well to conservative treatment. Few reports have described initial management strategies. Almost no cases of AARF with recurrence requiring internal fixation have been reported. Here, we describe a case of recurrent AARF requiring internal fixation.

CASE REPORT

A 5-year-old boy presented with a history of 22q.11.2 deletion syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, congenital left-sided clubfoot, and periodic vomiting. He was referred to a local pediatrician with neck pain and torticollis and was prescribed analgesics. After 5 days of no improvement, he was referred to a local pediatric orthopedic hospital where he was diagnosed with AARF (Fielding classification type III). The patient was then referred to our department for traction and orthotic therapy. Computed tomography revealed no deformity of the atlanto-axial articular surface and no evidence of bony fusion between the left and right posterior arches of the atlas. Following conservative treatment, the patient's neck pain and torticollis improved, and imaging confirmed the deformity had corrected. He was discharged on day 32. The symptoms recurred on day 42, and although traction and orthotic therapies were repeated, no improvement was observed. A halo vest was applied on day 59 after symptom onset. As the deformity was corrected, the halo vest was removed on day 94 and the patient continued to wear an orthosis. The patient recurrenced on day 104 and internal fixation was performed on day 120. Two 2.4-mm hollow screws were inserted using the Magerl method. No recurrence was observed at 213 days after onset, and bone union was confirmed by imaging test, and the brace was removed.

DISCUSSION

Factors contributing to the intractability and recurrence of AARF include laxity and dysfunction of the transverse ligament. In this case, the latter was suspected because of the lax ligament structure. The patient did not undergo atlanto-axial fusion at age 5 years and vertebral bone hypoplasia was observed. Patients with a congenital element may not respond to standard conservative treatment. Thus, if the dislocation is left untreated, the lateral atlanto-axial joint may completely dislocate and drop, causing myelopathy. Thus, early internal fixation is considered desirable in such cases.

CONCLUSION

In cases of AARF involving congenital factors, patients may not respond to standard conservative treatment. Early internal fixation should therefore be considered.

摘要

引言

大多数寰枢椎旋转固定(AARF)病例对保守治疗反应良好。很少有报告描述初始治疗策略。几乎没有关于复发性AARF需要内固定的病例报道。在此,我们描述一例复发性AARF需要内固定的病例。

病例报告

一名5岁男孩,有22q.11.2缺失综合征、迪乔治综合征、先天性左侧马蹄内翻足和周期性呕吐病史。他因颈部疼痛和斜颈被转诊至当地儿科医生处,并被开了止痛药。5天后无改善,他被转诊至当地儿科骨科医院,在那里被诊断为AARF(菲尔丁分类III型)。然后该患者被转诊至我科进行牵引和矫形治疗。计算机断层扫描显示寰枢关节面无畸形,寰椎左右后弓之间无骨融合迹象。经过保守治疗,患者的颈部疼痛和斜颈有所改善,影像学检查证实畸形已矫正。他于第32天出院。症状在第42天复发,尽管重复进行了牵引和矫形治疗,但未见改善。症状出现后第59天应用了头环背心。随着畸形矫正,头环背心于第94天移除,患者继续佩戴矫形器。患者在第104天复发,并于第120天进行了内固定。采用马格尔方法插入两枚2.4毫米空心螺钉。发病后213天未观察到复发,影像学检查证实骨愈合,矫形器被移除。

讨论

导致AARF难治性和复发性的因素包括横韧带松弛和功能障碍。在本病例中,由于韧带结构松弛怀疑存在后者。该患者5岁时未进行寰枢融合,且观察到椎体骨发育不全。有先天性因素的患者可能对标准保守治疗无反应。因此,如果脱位未得到治疗,寰枢外侧关节可能会完全脱位并下垂,导致脊髓病。因此,在此类病例中早期内固定被认为是可取的。

结论

在涉及先天性因素的AARF病例中,患者可能对标准保守治疗无反应。因此,应考虑早期内固定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验