Cyr J J, McKenna-Foley J M, Peacock E
J Pers Assess. 1985 Dec;49(6):571-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4906_2.
A review of the literature on the factor structure of the Symptom Check List-90-R (SCL-90-R) and its precursors makes evident the many problems inherent in this clinical assessment tool as a measure of independent dimensions of symptom distress, particularly in psychiatric patients. The many versions of the Symptom Check List are evaluated on several criteria (e.g., factor stability, factor loadings, proportion of variance, etc.). It is concluded that interpreting nine dimensions for clinical purposes is highly questionable. It is perhaps still a better measure of general distress as was intended in its original version approximately three decades ago.
对症状自评量表90项修订版(SCL - 90 - R)及其前身的因子结构相关文献进行回顾后发现,作为一种衡量症状困扰独立维度的临床评估工具,尤其是在精神科患者中,该工具存在诸多内在问题。症状自评量表的多个版本依据若干标准(如因子稳定性、因子载荷、方差比例等)进行了评估。得出的结论是,从临床目的出发解读九个维度极具疑问。它或许仍然是一个比大约三十年前其最初版本所设想的更好的一般困扰衡量指标。