Wonglhow Jirapat, Sathitruangsak Chirawadee, Sunpaweravong Patrapim, Wetwittayakhlang Panu, Dechaphunkul Arunee
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 22;17(17):2729. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172729.
The treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved significantly recently; however, access to novel agents remains limited because of high costs. This study aimed to evaluate the systemic treatment patterns and survival outcomes for advanced HCC across different systemic treatment sequences under real-world resource constraints. This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary center in Southern Thailand. The medical records of patients ( = 330) with advanced HCC treated with systemic therapy between 2010 and 2024 were reviewed. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Prognostic factors for OS were investigated. First-line therapies included tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; 69.7%), chemotherapy (23.3%), immunotherapy (IO)/targeted therapy (3.6%), dual IO (1.8%), and IO monotherapy (1.5%). The median OS, PFS, and ORR for each cohort were 7.2, 5.2, 10.9, 8.5, and 8.6 months; 3.94, 3.22, 3.48, 6.19, and 2.69 months; and 9.6%, 10.4%, 16.7%, 0%, and 20.0%, respectively. OS improved with increasing lines of therapy (4.5, 12.2, 19.4, and 40.7 months for one to four lines, respectively). Portal vein tumor thrombus, ascites, elevated bilirubin level, high alpha-fetoprotein level, and poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were associated with poor prognosis; multiple treatment lines and overweight status were associated with improved OS. In this large real-world cohort, TKIs remained the mainstay effective treatment option because of limited access to IO-based regimens. Sequential systemic therapy significantly improved survival, emphasizing the importance of preserving treatment eligibility and multidisciplinary team involvement. Chemotherapy could be considered a viable option in resource-limited settings.
晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗格局最近发生了显著变化;然而,由于成本高昂,获得新型药物的机会仍然有限。本研究旨在评估在现实世界资源限制下,不同全身治疗顺序的晚期HCC的全身治疗模式和生存结果。这项回顾性研究在泰国南部的一家三级中心进行。回顾了2010年至2024年间接受全身治疗的330例晚期HCC患者的病历。结果包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。研究了OS的预后因素。一线治疗包括酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI;69.7%)、化疗(23.3%)、免疫治疗(IO)/靶向治疗(3.6%)、双重IO(1.8%)和IO单药治疗(1.5%)。每个队列的中位OS、PFS和ORR分别为7.2、5.2、10.9、8.5和8.6个月;3.94、3.22、3.48、6.19和2.69个月;以及9.6%、10.4%、16.7%、0%和20.0%。OS随着治疗线数的增加而改善(一至四线分别为4.5、12.2、19.4和40.7个月)。门静脉肿瘤血栓、腹水、胆红素水平升高、甲胎蛋白水平高以及东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态差与预后不良相关;多线治疗和超重状态与OS改善相关。在这个大型现实世界队列中,由于基于IO的治疗方案可及性有限,TKI仍然是主要的有效治疗选择。序贯全身治疗显著改善了生存,强调了保持治疗资格和多学科团队参与的重要性。在资源有限的环境中,化疗可被视为一种可行的选择。