Arents Eva, Haesevoets Sarah, Hermans Fien, Quadflieg Kirsten, Cops Dries, Criel Maarten, Ruttens David, Surmont Veerle, Salhi Bihiyga, Derom Eric, Troosters Thierry, Stevens Dieter, Burtin Chris, Demeyer Heleen
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
REVAL-Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Sep 2;17(17):2886. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172886.
Patients with early-stage (I-IIIA) resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often experience reduced physical activity (PA) after surgery. PA telecoaching may support a more active lifestyle, but evidence in this population is limited.
To evaluate acceptability, feasibility, safety, and actual usage of an automated and manual PA telecoaching program following surgery for NSCLC.
In this multicenter, single-blind study, patients received either an eight-week automated coaching program (ACP) with a customized smartphone app or a manual coaching program (MCP) with weekly phone calls from a coach. Both groups used an activity tracker, linked to their smartphone, to monitor steps and receive feedback. Primary outcomes included acceptability, feasibility, safety and usage, assessed via questionnaires and interviews. Secondary outcomes included objectively measured PA (accelerometry), functional exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance) and symptoms (dyspnea, fatigue) and quality of life, evaluated via questionnaires.
Nineteen patients (12 males; 68 ± 6 years; baseline daily steps 7820 ± 2799) were included. The majority (18/19) found the intervention enjoyable, and a minority (6/19) reported minor smartphone issues. All patients wore the activity tracker consistently. No adverse events occurred. The ACP required significantly less coach contact time compared to the MCP (25 ± 14 vs. 54 ± 15 min, = 0.0003). No other differences in primary outcomes were observed between groups. Changes in secondary outcomes were limited in both groups.
PA telecoaching is feasible, well accepted, and safe in patients with NSCLC post-surgery, with excellent activity tracker adherence. The ACP required less coach involvement. However, increasing PA remains challenging, and no conclusions can be made about the effectiveness of telecoaching. Future research should explore longer interventions in larger populations to assess efficacy and long-term outcomes.
早期(I-IIIA期)可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者术后常出现身体活动(PA)减少。PA远程指导可能有助于支持更积极的生活方式,但该人群的相关证据有限。
评估NSCLC手术后自动化和人工PA远程指导项目的可接受性、可行性、安全性及实际使用情况。
在这项多中心、单盲研究中,患者要么接受为期八周的自动化指导项目(ACP),使用定制的智能手机应用程序,要么接受人工指导项目(MCP),由教练每周进行电话指导。两组都使用与智能手机相连的活动追踪器来监测步数并接收反馈。主要结局包括通过问卷调查和访谈评估的可接受性、可行性、安全性和使用情况。次要结局包括通过问卷调查评估的客观测量的PA(加速度计)、功能运动能力(六分钟步行距离)、症状(呼吸困难、疲劳)及生活质量。
纳入了19例患者(12例男性;68±6岁;基线每日步数7820±2799)。大多数患者(18/19)认为干预令人愉快,少数患者(6/19)报告了轻微的智能手机问题。所有患者均持续佩戴活动追踪器。未发生不良事件。与MCP相比,ACP所需的教练联系时间显著更少(25±14 vs. 54±15分钟,P = 0.0003)。两组之间在主要结局方面未观察到其他差异。两组次要结局的变化均有限。
PA远程指导对于NSCLC术后患者是可行的、易于接受的且安全的,活动追踪器的依从性良好。ACP所需的教练参与较少。然而,增加PA仍然具有挑战性,且无法得出关于远程指导有效性的结论。未来的研究应探索在更大人群中进行更长时间的干预,以评估疗效和长期结局。