• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评分系统对预测老年患者上消化道出血的死亡率有用吗?

Are Scoring Systems Useful in Predicting Mortality from Upper GI Bleeding in Geriatric Patients?

作者信息

Akkuzu Mustafa Zanyar, Ebik Berat

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Diyarbakır Gazi Yasargil Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Diyarbakır 21070, Turkey.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;15(17):2173. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172173.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15172173
PMID:40941660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12427740/
Abstract

: This study aimed to determine the in-hospital mortality rate after upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in geriatric patients with comorbidities. Additionally, it sought to identify effective cut-off values for predicting high-risk patients using AIMS65 and Rockall scores and to assess the impact of oral anticoagulant and NSAID use on mortality. : A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 64 patients aged 60 and above with at least one comorbidity who were admitted for upper GI bleeding between January 2023 and June 2024. AIMS65 and Rockall scores were calculated for each patient. The relationship between these scores, medication use, and mortality was analyzed using statistical methods, including ROC analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. : The mean age was 77.6 years, and all patients had at least one chronic disease; 57.8% used medications increasing bleeding risk. In-hospital mortality was 18.7%, with no significant association for oral anticoagulants ( = 0.275) or NSAIDs ( = 0.324). Sepsis, heart failure, chronic renal failure, and malignancy were strongly linked to mortality in univariate analysis; multivariate analysis confirmed sepsis and malignancy as independent predictors, with a trend for heart failure. AIMS65 ≥ 2 (sensitivity 90.1%, AUC = 0.920) and Rockall ≥ 6 (sensitivity 91.7%, AUC = 0.822) were both effective in predicting mortality, with risk rising cumulatively with higher scores ( < 0.001). : In-hospital mortality after upper GI bleeding is high in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities, mainly from sepsis, malignancy, and heart failure. AIMS65 and Rockall scores effectively predict mortality and may support earlier intervention. The small, high-risk cohort limits generalizability, underscoring the need for multicenter validation.

摘要

本研究旨在确定合并症老年患者上消化道(GI)出血后的院内死亡率。此外,该研究试图确定使用AIMS65和Rockall评分预测高危患者的有效临界值,并评估口服抗凝剂和非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的使用对死亡率的影响。

对2023年1月至2024年6月期间因上消化道出血入院的64例60岁及以上且至少患有一种合并症的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。为每位患者计算AIMS65和Rockall评分。使用包括ROC分析和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线在内的统计方法分析了这些评分、药物使用与死亡率之间的关系。

平均年龄为77.6岁,所有患者至少患有一种慢性病;57.8%的患者使用增加出血风险的药物。院内死亡率为18.7%,口服抗凝剂(P = 0.275)或非甾体抗炎药(P = 0.324)与死亡率无显著关联。在单因素分析中,脓毒症、心力衰竭、慢性肾衰竭和恶性肿瘤与死亡率密切相关;多因素分析证实脓毒症和恶性肿瘤是独立的预测因素,心力衰竭有相关趋势。AIMS65≥2(敏感性90.1%,AUC = 0.920)和Rockall≥6(敏感性91.7%,AUC = 0.822)均能有效预测死亡率,且随着评分升高风险累积增加(P < 0.001)。

合并多种合并症的老年患者上消化道出血后的院内死亡率很高,主要源于脓毒症、恶性肿瘤和心力衰竭。AIMS65和Rockall评分能有效预测死亡率,并可能支持早期干预。该小型高危队列限制了研究结果的普遍性,凸显了多中心验证的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/04c8b2fdf85b/diagnostics-15-02173-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/5b17beb7e0dd/diagnostics-15-02173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/154f59afcc35/diagnostics-15-02173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/3d58f42d7b66/diagnostics-15-02173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/9038571a158e/diagnostics-15-02173-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/04c8b2fdf85b/diagnostics-15-02173-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/5b17beb7e0dd/diagnostics-15-02173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/154f59afcc35/diagnostics-15-02173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/3d58f42d7b66/diagnostics-15-02173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/9038571a158e/diagnostics-15-02173-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2042/12427740/04c8b2fdf85b/diagnostics-15-02173-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Are Scoring Systems Useful in Predicting Mortality from Upper GI Bleeding in Geriatric Patients?评分系统对预测老年患者上消化道出血的死亡率有用吗?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;15(17):2173. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172173.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Comparison of the new risk score (ABL) with the Glasgow Blatchford Score, AIMS65, and pre-endoscopic Rockall Score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to the emergency department.急诊科收治的上消化道出血患者中,新风险评分(ABL)与格拉斯哥布莱奇福德评分、AIMS65评分及内镜前罗卡尔评分的比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01291-z.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Interventions for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in people admitted to intensive care units.重症监护病房患者上消化道出血的预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD008687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008687.pub2.
6
Oral and intranasal aspirin desensitisation for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease.用于非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)诱发的呼吸道疾病的口服和鼻内阿司匹林脱敏疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 7;1(1):CD013476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013476.pub2.
7
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

本文引用的文献

1
Which scoring systems are useful for predicting the prognosis of lower gastrointestinal bleeding? Old and new.哪些评分系统有助于预测下消化道出血的预后?新旧评分系统。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03638-z.
2
Optimal endoscopy timing in elderly patients presenting with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的最佳内镜检查时机
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03541-z.
3
Diagnostic Yield and Outcomes of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Small Bowel Bleeding Receiving Antithrombotics.
接受抗栓治疗的小肠出血患者小肠胶囊内镜检查的诊断率及结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;14(13):1361. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131361.
4
Prediction of 30-day in-hospital mortality in older UGIB patients using a simplified risk score and comparison with AIMS65 score.利用简化风险评分预测老年 UGIB 患者 30 天住院死亡率,并与 AIMS65 评分进行比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04971-w.
5
Anatomical location, risk factors, and outcomes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in colorectal cancer patients: a national inpatient sample analysis (2009-2019).结直肠癌患者下消化道出血的解剖部位、危险因素和结局:全国住院患者样本分析(2009-2019 年)。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Aug 4;38(1):205. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04503-9.
6
Update on the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.上消化道出血管理的最新进展
BMJ Med. 2022 Sep 28;1(1):e000202. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000202. eCollection 2022.
7
Use of the AIMS65 and pre-endoscopy Rockall scores in the prediction of mortality in patients with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding.使用 AIMS65 和内镜检查前 Rockall 评分预测上消化道出血患者的死亡率。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Dec;29(1):100-104. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.38890.
8
Mortality Rate in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Associated with Anti-Thrombotic Therapy Before and During Covid-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情之前及期间抗血栓治疗相关上消化道出血的死亡率
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Nov 18;15:2679-2692. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S380500. eCollection 2022.
9
Forrest Classification for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A New Look at the Old Endoscopic Classification.消化性溃疡出血的福里斯特分类:对旧内镜分类的新审视。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 24;12(5):1066. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051066.
10
Risk Stratification in Cancer Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65, and Development of a New Scoring System.癌症合并急性上消化道出血患者的风险分层:格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分、罗卡尔评分和AIMS65评分的比较以及一种新评分系统的开发
Clin Endosc. 2022 Mar;55(2):240-247. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.115. Epub 2022 Jan 21.