Suppr超能文献

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术使用零轮廓三维打印椎间融合器与钛板融合器的疗效比较

[Effectiveness comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile three-dimensional-printed interbody fusion Cage and titanium plate fusion Cage].

作者信息

Li Yuwei, Li Xiuzhi, Li Bowen, Gu Yunling, Yang Tiantian, Zhao Lei, Cui Wei, Gu Shifeng, Wang Haijiao

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Luohe Central Hospital, Luohe Henan, 462000, P. R. China.

Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P. R. China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Sep 15;39(9):1187-1195. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202505049.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of a zero-profile three-dimensiaonal (3D)-printed microporous titanium alloy Cage and a conventional titanium plate combined with a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK)-Cage in the treatment of single-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

The clinical data of 83 patients with single-segment CSM treated with ACDF between January 2022 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into 3D-ZP group (35 cases, using zero-profile 3D-printed microporous titanium alloy Cage) and CP group (48 cases, using titanium plate in combination with PEEK-Cage). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, surgical intervertebral space, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, neck disability index (NDI), vertebral height at the fusion segment, Cobb angle, and other baseline data between the two groups (>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, complications, interbody fusion, and prosthesis subsidence were recorded and compared between the two groups. VAS score, NDI, and JOA score were used to evaluate the improvement of pain and function before operation, at 3 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the vertebral height at the fusion segment and Cobb angle were measured by imaging. The degree of dysphagia was assessed by the Bazaz dysphagia scale at 1 week and at last follow-up.

RESULTS

The operation was successfully completed in all the 83 patients. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups (>0.05), but the operation time in the 3D-ZP group was significantly shorter than that in the CP group (<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 24-35 months, with an average of 25.3 months, and there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (>0.05). The incidence and grade of dysphagia in CP group were significantly higher than those in 3D-ZP group at 1 week after operation and at last follow-up (<0.05). There was no dysphagia in 3D-ZP group at last follow-up. There was no complication such as implant breakage or displacement in both groups. The intervertebral fusion rates of 3D-ZP group and CP group were 65.71% (23/35) and 60.42% (29/48) respectively at 3 months after operation, and there was no significant difference between the two groups [ (95%)=1.256 (0.507, 3.109), =0.622]. The JOA score, VAS score, and NDI significantly improved in the 3D-ZP group at 3 months and at last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones (<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (>0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement rate of JOA between the two groups at last follow-up (>0.05). At 3 months after operation and at last follow-up, the vertebral height at the fusion segment and Cobb angle significantly improved in both groups, and the two indexes in 3D-ZP group were significantly better than those in CP group (<0.05). At last follow-up, the incidence of prosthesis subsidence in 3D-ZP group (8.57%) was significantly lower than that in CP group (29.16%) (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The application of zero-profile 3D-printed Cage and titanium plate combined with PEEK-Cage in single-segment ACDF can both reconstruct the stability of cervical spine and achieve good effectiveness. Compared with the latter, the application of the former in ACDF can shorten the operation time, reduce the incidence of prosthesis subsidence, and reduce the incidence of dysphagia.

摘要

目的

比较零轮廓三维(3D)打印微孔钛合金椎间融合器与传统钛板联合聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗单节段脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)中的有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年1月行ACDF治疗的83例单节段CSM患者的临床资料,将其分为3D-ZP组(35例,采用零轮廓3D打印微孔钛合金椎间融合器)和CP组(48例,采用钛板联合PEEK椎间融合器)。两组患者在性别、年龄、病程、手术节段、术前日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、融合节段椎体高度、Cobb角等基线资料方面差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、并发症、椎间融合及假体下沉情况。采用VAS评分、NDI和JOA评分评估术前、术后3个月及末次随访时疼痛和功能的改善情况,通过影像学测量融合节段椎体高度和Cobb角。在术后1周和末次随访时采用Bazaz吞咽困难量表评估吞咽困难程度。

结果

83例患者均顺利完成手术。两组患者术中出血量和住院时间差异无统计学意义(>0.05),但3D-ZP组手术时间明显短于CP组(<0.05)。两组患者均随访24 - 35个月,平均25.3个月,两组随访时间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。术后1周及末次随访时,CP组吞咽困难的发生率及分级均明显高于3D-ZP组(<0.05)。3D-ZP组末次随访时无吞咽困难发生。两组均未发生植入物断裂或移位等并发症。术后3个月时,3D-ZP组和CP组的椎间融合率分别为65.71%(23/35)和60.42%(29/48),两组间差异无统计学意义[(95%)=1.256(0.507,3.109),=0.622]。与术前相比,3D-ZP组术后3个月及末次随访时JOA评分、VAS评分和NDI均明显改善(<0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。末次随访时两组JOA评分改善率差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。术后3个月及末次随访时,两组融合节段椎体高度和Cobb角均明显改善,且3D-ZP组的这两项指标明显优于CP组(<0.05)。末次随访时,3D-ZP组假体下沉发生率(8.57%)明显低于CP组(29.16%)(<0.05)。

结论

零轮廓3D打印椎间融合器和钛板联合PEEK椎间融合器在单节段ACDF中均能重建颈椎稳定性,取得良好疗效。与后者相比,前者应用于ACDF可缩短手术时间,降低假体下沉发生率,减少吞咽困难的发生率。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验