• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How Stereotype Threat Influences Cognitive Performance: It All Depends on How You Feel!刻板印象威胁如何影响认知表现:这完全取决于你的感受!
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2025 Feb 17;38:1. doi: 10.5334/irsp.976. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
9
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of social comparison on effort: When similar and slightly better peers increase effort-related cardiovascular responses.社会比较对努力的影响:当相似且略好的同伴增加与努力相关的心血管反应时。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2023 Oct;192:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
2
Oculometric indicators of individual differences in preparatory control during the antisaccade task.眼动指标在反扫视任务预备性控制中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Feb;49(2):159-176. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001070. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
3
Valuing high arousal negative states increases negative responses toward outgroups across cultures.重视高唤醒的消极状态会增加跨文化群体对群体的消极反应。
Emotion. 2022 Oct;22(7):1450-1472. doi: 10.1037/emo0001101. Epub 2022 May 12.
4
When stereotype threat makes me more or less intelligent: The informative role of emotions in effort mobilization and task performance.当刻板印象威胁使我变得更聪明或更不聪明时:情绪在努力调动和任务表现中的信息作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jan;59(1):137-156. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12327. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
5
Working memory span tasks: Group administration and omitting accuracy criterion do not change metric characteristics.工作记忆广度任务:组内施测和省略准确率标准不改变度量特征。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205169. eCollection 2018.
6
Pupil size reflects successful encoding and recall of memory in humans.瞳孔大小反映了人类在记忆编码和提取方面的成功程度。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 21;8(1):4949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23197-6.
7
Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review.瞳孔扩张作为认知控制任务努力程度的指标:综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2005-2015. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1432-y.
8
Stereotype Threat Effects on Older Adults' Episodic and Working Memory: A Meta-Analysis.刻板印象威胁对老年人情节记忆和工作记忆的影响:一项元分析。
Gerontologist. 2017 Aug 1;57(suppl_2):S193-S205. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx056.
9
"When the going gets tough, the tough get going": Motivation towards closure and effort investment in the performance of cognitive tasks.“艰难之路,唯勇者行”:完成任务的动机以及在认知任务表现中的努力投入
Motiv Emot. 2017;41(3):308-321. doi: 10.1007/s11031-017-9613-y. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators.二十年的刻板印象威胁研究:心理中介因素综述
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146487. eCollection 2016.

刻板印象威胁如何影响认知表现:这完全取决于你的感受!

How Stereotype Threat Influences Cognitive Performance: It All Depends on How You Feel!

作者信息

Drače Saša, Dolarević Verda, Šašić Elma

机构信息

University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2025 Feb 17;38:1. doi: 10.5334/irsp.976. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.5334/irsp.976
PMID:40948594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12372774/
Abstract

Studies have shown that mood could be used as diagnostic information for the assessment of situational demands and that, as such, it can regulate resource mobilization. Accordingly, it was found that negative mood causes overestimation of situational demands, which then leads to effort exertion during performance on easy tasks but disengagement on difficult tasks. The present research investigated whether this mood-motivation relation could be extended to specific emotions to explain the effect of stereotype threat (ST). In order to answer this question, the participants in the standard (fear-based) ST and the no-ST conditions had to perform easy (Study 1) or difficult (Study 2) cognitive tasks. To further explore the hypothetical role of threat-related emotions in each study we introduced another condition in which participants under ST were induced to feel anger (i.e., an emotion theoretically characterized by the perception of low situational demands). Although both ST conditions consistently showed greater stereotype-related concerns compared with the control (no-ST) group, the expected increase in easy task performance (Study 1) and decrease in difficult task performance (Study 2) were observed only in the standard (fear-based) ST condition, but not when participants under ST experienced anger. Our findings suggest that specific emotions emerging under ST could govern motivational processes and account for the effect of ST. Accordingly, the way that individuals appraise ST may have an important impact on task performance.

摘要

研究表明,情绪可作为评估情境需求的诊断信息,并且据此,它能够调节资源调动。相应地,研究发现消极情绪会导致对情境需求的高估,进而在简单任务的执行过程中导致努力付出,但在困难任务中则导致放弃。本研究调查了这种情绪与动机的关系是否可以扩展到特定情绪,以解释刻板印象威胁(ST)的影响。为了回答这个问题,处于标准(基于恐惧的)ST条件和无ST条件下的参与者必须执行简单(研究1)或困难(研究2)的认知任务。为了在每项研究中进一步探究与威胁相关的情绪的假设作用,我们引入了另一种条件,即诱导处于ST条件下的参与者产生愤怒情绪(即一种理论上以对低情境需求的感知为特征的情绪)。尽管与对照组(无ST)相比,两种ST条件下都始终表现出更大的与刻板印象相关的担忧,但仅在标准(基于恐惧的)ST条件下观察到了在简单任务表现上预期的提高(研究1)以及在困难任务表现上预期的下降,而当处于ST条件下的参与者体验到愤怒时则未观察到。我们的研究结果表明,在ST情境下出现的特定情绪可能会支配动机过程,并解释ST的影响。因此,个体评估ST的方式可能会对任务表现产生重要影响。