Yan Chenxi, Hu Shaojie, Tian Yitao, Zhang Xiaoxue, Sun Wei
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Department of Cardiac and Great Vascular Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 31;14(8):2969-2982. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-304. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
Distinguishing multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas (MPLAs) from intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is essential for accurate staging and treatment planning. However, existing histologic and molecular criteria remain limited in diagnostic accuracy. Spread through air spaces (STAS) has been recognized as a marker of tumor aggressiveness, but its role in differentiating MPLA from IPM remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether STAS can serve as a supportive marker to differentiate IPM from MPLA under both histologic and molecular frameworks.
We retrospectively enrolled 170 patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with MPLA and underwent surgical resection of multiple lung lesions. Clinical, histopathologic, and molecular data-including broad-panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) results [e.g., epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), tumor protein p53 (TP53), among others]-were collected. Tumors were classified as MPLA or IPM using histologic criteria alone and a combined histologic-molecular algorithm. The presence and quantity of STAS were evaluated and analyzed as potential predictors of IPM.
STAS was more frequent in the IPM group across both classification methods and was an independent predictor of IPM. Driver gene mutations (e.g., EGFR, KRAS) differed significantly between MPLA and IPM. The 83.5% concordance between histologic and combined classifications suggests potential bias in histology alone. In resource-limited settings, STAS may offer a cost-effective adjunct to support IPM diagnosis when molecular data are unavailable.
STAS is associated with IPM and may serve as a supportive diagnostic marker when distinguishing IPM from MPLA. In resource-limited settings where molecular testing is not always available, STAS may offer a practical, cost-effective histologic adjunct to guide clinical decision-making.
区分多原发性肺腺癌(MPLA)与肺内转移瘤(IPM)对于准确分期和治疗规划至关重要。然而,现有的组织学和分子标准在诊断准确性方面仍然有限。气腔播散(STAS)已被认为是肿瘤侵袭性的标志物,但其在区分MPLA和IPM中的作用仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估在组织学和分子框架下,STAS是否可作为区分IPM和MPLA的辅助标志物。
我们回顾性纳入了170例术前诊断为MPLA并接受了多个肺病灶手术切除的患者。收集了临床、组织病理学和分子数据,包括全谱二代测序(NGS)结果[例如,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、 Kirsten大鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物(KRAS)、肿瘤蛋白p53(TP53)等]。仅使用组织学标准以及组织学-分子联合算法将肿瘤分类为MPLA或IPM。评估并分析STAS的存在和数量作为IPM的潜在预测指标。
在两种分类方法中,STAS在IPM组中更为常见,并且是IPM的独立预测指标。MPLA和IPM之间的驱动基因突变(例如,EGFR、KRAS)存在显著差异。组织学分类和联合分类之间83.5%的一致性表明仅组织学分类可能存在偏差。在资源有限的情况下,当无法获得分子数据时,STAS可能为支持IPM诊断提供一种经济有效的辅助手段。
STAS与IPM相关,在区分IPM和MPLA时可能作为辅助诊断标志物。在分子检测并非总是可行的资源有限的情况下,STAS可能提供一种实用、经济有效的组织学辅助手段来指导临床决策。