Zhu Ringo Tang-Long, Schulte Friederike A, Singh Navrag B, Ma Christina Zong-Hao, Easthope Chris Awai, Ravi Deepak K
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Research Institute for Smart Ageing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 29;13:1642158. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1642158. eCollection 2025.
Single-session perturbation-based balance training (PBT) has demonstrated improvements in dynamic stability during the initial step following perturbation in older adults. However, its broader effects on comprehensive balance recovery remain inconclusive. This pilot laboratory-based randomized controlled study investigated the impact of personalized single-session PBT on reactive balance control during walking, employing advanced stability analysis techniques.
Ten participants in the training group (67.1 ± 2.8 years; 5 males & 5 females) underwent a single session consisting of 32 unpredictable treadmill-induced slips and trips of progressively increasing intensity, while ten participants in the control group (72.8 ± 5.2 years; 5 males & 5 females) engaged in unperturbed treadmill walking. Key outcome measures included margin of stability (MoS) parameters: minimum MoS and the number of recovery steps, and resilience parameters: peak instability and recovery time, assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention following an unexpected treadmill slip.
In the training group, participants exhibited significant increases in minimum MoS values immediately post-intervention (-33 ± 84 mm; < 0.001) and 3 months post-intervention (-71 ± 70 mm; < 0.01) as compared to pre-intervention (-140 ± 87 mm); they also showed a significant reduction in peak instability immediately post-intervention (34 ± 14 mm; 0.019) as compared to pre-intervention (57 ± 25 mm). These changes were not observed in the control group. However, neither group demonstrated significant alterations in the number of recovery steps or recovery time across the different assessment periods.
In conclusion, single-session PBT enhanced reactive balance control by improving the magnitude of post-perturbation responses, but it did not significantly influence the speed of recovery to baseline conditions.
基于单节段扰动的平衡训练(PBT)已证明可改善老年人在扰动后的初始步骤中的动态稳定性。然而,其对全面平衡恢复的更广泛影响仍无定论。这项基于实验室的试点随机对照研究采用先进的稳定性分析技术,调查了个性化单节段PBT对步行过程中反应性平衡控制的影响。
训练组的10名参与者(67.1±2.8岁;5名男性和5名女性)进行了一次包含32次不可预测的跑步机诱导滑倒和绊倒的训练,强度逐渐增加,而对照组的10名参与者(72.8±5.2岁;5名男性和5名女性)进行无扰动的跑步机步行。关键结局指标包括稳定性裕度(MoS)参数:最小MoS和恢复步数,以及恢复力参数:峰值不稳定性和恢复时间,在基线、干预后立即以及意外跑步机滑倒后的干预后3个月进行评估。
与干预前(-140±87毫米)相比,训练组参与者在干预后立即(-33±84毫米;P<0.001)和干预后3个月(-71±70毫米;P<0.01)的最小MoS值显著增加;与干预前(57±25毫米)相比,他们在干预后立即的峰值不稳定性也显著降低(34±14毫米;P=0.019)。对照组未观察到这些变化。然而,两组在不同评估期的恢复步数或恢复时间均未显示出显著变化。
总之,单节段PBT通过改善扰动后反应的幅度增强了反应性平衡控制,但并未显著影响恢复到基线状态的速度。