相似文献
1
Research That Is Not Published Is Not Worth Doing.未发表的研究就不值得去做。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 Sep 12:02537176251377594. doi: 10.1177/02537176251377594.
2
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
3
Patterns of preregistration and publication of trials in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions.Cochrane干预措施系统评价中试验的预注册与发表模式。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Sep 1;187:111958. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111958.
5
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.研究结果的传播和发表：相关偏倚的更新综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080.
6
Troubling Trends in Biomedical Research Publication: "Publish or Perish" Results in a Propensity for Ethical Violations.生物医学研究出版中的不良趋势：“不发表就出局”导致违反伦理的倾向。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Apr;41(4):859-862. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.12.017. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
8
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作：定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
9
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中，在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值：对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
10
Effects of a gluten-reduced or gluten-free diet for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.减少或无麸质饮食对心血管疾病一级预防的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013556.pub2.
本文引用的文献
1
Time to publication for results of clinical trials.临床试验结果的发表时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 27;11(11):MR000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000011.pub3.
2
Correction: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.勘误：为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 25;19(8):e1004085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004085. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy: Updated comparisons and meta-analyses of newer versus older trials.选择性发布抗抑郁药试验及其对明显疗效的影响：更新的新试验与旧试验比较和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 19;19(1):e1003886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003886. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Researcher's Perceptions on Publishing "Negative" Results and Open Access.研究者对发表“负面”结果和开放获取的看法。
Nucleic Acid Ther. 2021 Jun;31(3):185-189. doi: 10.1089/nat.2020.0865. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Abstract to publication rate: Do all the papers presented in conferences see the light of being a full publication?摘要发表率：在会议上展示的所有论文都能成为完整出版物发表吗？
Indian J Psychiatry. 2020 Jan-Feb;62(1):73-79. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_320_19. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Publications Are Not the Finish Line: Focusing on Societal Rather Than Publication Impact.发表并非终点：关注社会影响而非发表影响力。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Nov 12;5:314. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00314. eCollection 2018.
7
Barriers towards the publication of academic drug trials. Follow-up of trials approved by the Danish Medicines Agency.学术药物试验发表的障碍。丹麦药品管理局批准的试验随访。
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0172581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172581. eCollection 2017.
8
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.开放获取的学术、经济和社会影响：基于证据的综述。
F1000Res. 2016 Apr 11;5:632. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3. eCollection 2016.
9
SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.科学标准。促进开放的研究文化。
Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374.
10
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.文献计量学：《莱顿研究指标宣言》
Nature. 2015 Apr 23;520(7548):429-31. doi: 10.1038/520429a.
Zotero 插件