Alexopoulos Evangelia, Walsh Joanna, Hsu Jesse Y, Blaha Michael J, Cheng Susan, Daubert Melissa A, Dunn Gary, Durda Peter, Fox Ervin Ray, Thomas Yngvil, van den Heuvel Edwin, Judd Suzanne E, Vasan Ramachandran S, Douglas Pamela S, Bloomfield Gerald S
Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
medRxiv. 2025 Sep 2:2025.08.27.25334591. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.27.25334591.
Few studies have evaluated the prevalence or severity of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and other valvular heart disease (VHD) in the rural US South, where strategies for early detection are crucial for risk stratification and prevention.
We assessed the prevalence of MVP and other VHD in a rural US South cohort and examined associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We also evaluated relationships between MVP severity, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP).
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis from the Risk Underlying Rural Areas Longitudinal (RURAL) study. Logistic regression assessed associations between participant characteristics and MVP, other VHD, or both. Weighted models assessed odds for MVP and other VHD by 10-year CVD risk categories using the Predicting Risk of CVD Events (PREVENT) score. Among a subset, we evaluated associations between MVP severity and cardiac biomarkers.
Among 2,621 participants (68.7% women), MVP and other VHD were present in 1.9% and 11.2%, respectively. Compared to the low PREVENT risk group, odds of MVP were lower and odds of VHD were higher among borderline and intermediate/high groups. HsTnT was lower in MVP vs. non-MVP (0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.71), without difference by severity of MVP. NTproBNP was higher in participants with severe MVP than non-MVP (2.05, 95% CI 1.49-2.83).
MVP prevalence aligned with population-based epidemiologic studies. PREVENT risk category may differentiate individuals at higher risk for MVP and for other VHD. Future studies are needed to evaluate relationships between MVP/VHD status and clinical events.
在美国南部农村地区,很少有研究评估二尖瓣脱垂(MVP)和其他瓣膜性心脏病(VHD)的患病率或严重程度,而早期检测策略对于风险分层和预防至关重要。
我们评估了美国南部农村队列中MVP和其他VHD的患病率,并研究了其与心血管疾病(CVD)风险的关联。我们还评估了MVP严重程度、高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T(hsTnT)和N末端B型脑钠肽原(NTproBNP)之间的关系。
我们对农村地区潜在风险纵向(RURAL)研究进行了横断面分析。逻辑回归评估了参与者特征与MVP、其他VHD或两者之间的关联。加权模型使用预测CVD事件风险(PREVENT)评分,按10年CVD风险类别评估MVP和其他VHD的比值比。在一个子集中,我们评估了MVP严重程度与心脏生物标志物之间的关联。
在2621名参与者(68.7%为女性)中,MVP和其他VHD的患病率分别为1.9%和11.2%。与PREVENT低风险组相比,临界组和中/高风险组中MVP的比值比更低,VHD的比值比更高。MVP患者的hsTnT低于非MVP患者(0.64,95%CI 0.58-0.71),且不受MVP严重程度的影响。重度MVP患者的NTproBNP高于非MVP患者(2.05,95%CI 1.49-2.83)。
MVP患病率与基于人群的流行病学研究一致。PREVENT风险类别可能有助于区分MVP和其他VHD风险较高的个体。未来需要开展研究来评估MVP/VHD状态与临床事件之间的关系。