• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项可行性研究:利用基于手机的工具收集赞比亚社区层面疫苗接种行为和社会驱动因素(BeSD)的数据。

A feasibility study: Using mobile phone-based tools to collect community-level Behavioral and Social Drivers (BeSD) of vaccination data in Zambia.

作者信息

Shragai Talya, Riley Christina, Bwalya Mukuka, Sikare Ester, Tembo Rose, Bibohere Jacob, Kalangwa Kalangwa, Mulenga Winfridah Liwoyo, Simooya Constance, Aguma Olivia, Matanda Kennedy, Liwewe Mazyanga Mazaba, Abad Neetu, Lam Eugene, Winters Anna, Bonner Kimberly E

机构信息

Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Akros, Lusaka, Zambia.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 16;5(9):e0004839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004839. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004839
PMID:40956815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12440194/
Abstract

Routine collection of behavioral and social drivers (BeSD) of vaccination data is essential for understanding and addressing vaccine confidence and demand to achieve high vaccination coverage. Traditional house-to-house data collection methods are resource-intensive, prompting the need for alternative, scalable approaches. This study tested the feasibility of using mobile phone surveys to collect community-level BeSD data on COVID-19 vaccination in Zambia. A cross-sectional survey of adults aged 18 and over was conducted in three districts: Lusaka, Kalomo, and Chavuma. Participants were recruited via geotargeted mobile phone messages and responded using push-button inputs. The survey adapted validated BeSD questions from the World Health Organization (WHO) framework and was administered in English and six local languages. Strategies to increase response rates were tested, including offering a small monetary incentive and conducting community outreach via radio jingles. To assess the feasibility of using mobile phone surveys to collect BeSD data, we report on response rates and the demographic distribution of respondents and describe the operational process of applying this methodology. From March to July 2024, a total of 52,983 recruitment messages were sent, yielding an overall response rate of 15.7%. Response rates varied by district, with Chavuma having the highest (68.2%) and Lusaka the lowest (4.2%). Compared to a baseline response rate of 4.7%, offering a monetary incentive increased the response rate to 31.4%, while community outreach increased it to 19.8%. Respondents skewed younger (69.5% aged 18-29 years) and male (65.9%). Mobile phone surveys present a feasible method for collecting real-time BeSD data at the community level in low-resource settings. Incentives and community outreach effectively increase participation, though results may need to be weighted to reflect population demographics.

摘要

常规收集疫苗接种行为和社会驱动因素(BeSD)数据对于理解和解决疫苗信心及需求以实现高疫苗接种覆盖率至关重要。传统的逐户数据收集方法资源消耗大,因此需要替代性的、可扩展的方法。本研究测试了使用手机调查收集赞比亚社区层面新冠疫苗接种BeSD数据的可行性。对卢萨卡、卡洛莫和查武马三个地区18岁及以上成年人进行了横断面调查。通过地理定位手机信息招募参与者,并使用按键输入进行回复。该调查采用了世界卫生组织(WHO)框架中经过验证的BeSD问题,并以英语和六种当地语言进行。测试了提高回复率的策略,包括提供小额金钱激励以及通过广播广告进行社区宣传。为评估使用手机调查收集BeSD数据的可行性,我们报告了回复率和受访者的人口统计学分布,并描述了应用该方法的操作过程。2024年3月至7月,共发送了52,983条招募信息,总体回复率为15.7%。回复率因地区而异,查武马最高(68.2%),卢萨卡最低(4.2%)。与4.7%的基线回复率相比,提供金钱激励使回复率提高到31.4%,而社区宣传使其提高到19.8%。受访者以年轻人(18 - 29岁占69.5%)和男性(65.9%)为主。手机调查是在资源匮乏地区社区层面收集实时BeSD数据的可行方法。激励措施和社区宣传有效提高了参与度,不过可能需要对结果进行加权以反映人口统计学特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127c/12440194/ca673432304a/pgph.0004839.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127c/12440194/457a95dcedc6/pgph.0004839.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127c/12440194/1f85e2b11fa9/pgph.0004839.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127c/12440194/ca673432304a/pgph.0004839.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127c/12440194/457a95dcedc6/pgph.0004839.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127c/12440194/1f85e2b11fa9/pgph.0004839.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127c/12440194/ca673432304a/pgph.0004839.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A feasibility study: Using mobile phone-based tools to collect community-level Behavioral and Social Drivers (BeSD) of vaccination data in Zambia.一项可行性研究:利用基于手机的工具收集赞比亚社区层面疫苗接种行为和社会驱动因素(BeSD)的数据。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 16;5(9):e0004839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004839. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the Response Results of an mHealth-Based Patient Experience Survey Among People Receiving HIV Care in Lusaka, Zambia: Cohort Study.评估赞比亚卢萨卡接受艾滋病毒护理人群基于移动医疗的患者体验调查的反应结果:队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 30;26:e54304. doi: 10.2196/54304.
3
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
4
Mobile Phone Syndromic Surveillance for Respiratory Conditions in an Emergency (COVID-19) Context in Colombia: Representative Survey Design.移动电话综合征监测在哥伦比亚紧急(COVID-19)情况下的呼吸道状况:代表性调查设计。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 17;26:e50184. doi: 10.2196/50184.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Use of mobile phones to collect data on COVID-19: phone access and participation rates, in Rakai, Uganda.利用手机收集 COVID-19 数据:乌干达拉凯的手机使用情况和参与率。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2419160. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2419160. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
7
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
8
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
9
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
10
Design of an Automated Mobile Phone-Based Reminder and Incentive System: Application in a Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve the Timeliness of Childhood Vaccinations in Tanzania.基于手机的自动化提醒与激励系统设计:在坦桑尼亚一项准随机对照试验中的应用,以提高儿童疫苗接种及时性
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Sep 10;9:e65150. doi: 10.2196/65150.

本文引用的文献

1
Declining trends in vaccine confidence across sub-Saharan Africa: A large-scale cross-sectional modeling study.撒哈拉以南非洲地区疫苗信心呈下降趋势:一项大规模的横断面建模研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 31;19(1):2213117. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2213117. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
2
Geographic Heterogeneity in Behavioral and Social Drivers of COVID-19 Vaccination.COVID-19 疫苗接种行为和社会驱动因素的地域差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Dec;63(6):883-893. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
3
Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South African Local Communities: The VaxScenes Study.
南非当地社区新冠疫苗犹豫的预测因素:VaxScenes研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Feb 25;10(3):353. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030353.
4
Explaining the intention to uptake COVID-19 vaccination using the behavioral and social drivers of vaccination (BeSD) model.运用疫苗接种行为和社会驱动因素(BeSD)模型解释接种新冠疫苗的意愿。
Vaccine X. 2022 Apr;10:100140. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100140. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples.关于便利样本和有目的样本的尴尬真相。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2021 Jan;43(1):86-88. doi: 10.1177/0253717620977000. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Use of short message service for monitoring Zika-related behaviors in four Latin American countries: lessons learned from the field.在四个拉丁美洲国家使用短信服务监测与寨卡病毒相关的行为:实地经验教训
Mhealth. 2019 Aug 5;5:23. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.07.01. eCollection 2019.
7
Does mobile phone survey method matter? Reliability of computer-assisted telephone interviews and interactive voice response non-communicable diseases risk factor surveys in low and middle income countries.手机调查方法是否重要?在中低收入国家,计算机辅助电话访谈和交互式语音应答非传染性疾病风险因素调查的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0214450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214450. eCollection 2019.
8
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action.增加疫苗接种:将心理科学付诸行动。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Dec;18(3):149-207. doi: 10.1177/1529100618760521.
9
Use of SMS-Based Surveys in the Rapid Response to the Ebola Outbreak in Liberia: Opening Community Dialogue.基于短信的调查在利比里亚埃博拉疫情快速应对中的应用:开启社区对话
J Health Commun. 2017;22(sup1):15-23. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1224279.
10
Building the Evidence Base for Remote Data Collection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Comparing Reliability and Accuracy Across Survey Modalities.建立低收入和中等收入国家远程数据收集的证据基础:比较不同调查方式的可靠性和准确性。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 5;19(5):e140. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7331.