• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用死亡率计数的每周超标情况和死亡率指标的每周变化分析疾病控制与预防中心的死亡率数据:一项时间序列研究。

Analyzing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Mortality Data Using Weekly Exceedance in Mortality Count and Weekly Change in Mortality Indicator: A Time Series Study.

作者信息

Chakrabarty Aditya, Pant Mohan D

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, & Environmental Health, Joint School of Public Health Old Dominion University Norfolk Virginia USA.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 14;8(9):e71235. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71235. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.71235
PMID:40959190
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12434084/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cause-specific mortality (CSM) count prediction plays a vital role in the context of public health policy. In this study, we introduce a new analytical approach, which is divided into three phases to answer specific questions regarding CSM due to 14 specific causes by computing different simple, compound, and conditional probabilities.

METHODS

A multivariate time series forecasting model was developed using the CDC weekly mortality count data. A binary data matrix was constructed for 14 causes of death (COD) as a function of weeks by combining the observed and forecasted mortalities. We introduced two new concepts: Weekly Exceedance in Mortality Count () and Weekly Change in Mortality Indicator (), which were instrumental in computing various probabilities relating to all the CODs. To test the null hypothesis of no association between the COD and a chi-square test of independence was conducted whereas Cramer's V statistic was used to check the strength of the association. Wilcoxon rank sum test, and correlation indices were used to validate the method.

RESULTS

The results of chi-square test of independence indicated that there was no statistically significant association between COD and ( = 0.79). Furthermore, the effect size of this association between COD and was very small (Cramer's V = 0.055). The results of Wilcoxon rank sum test indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between the observed and forecasted counts ( = 0.11) confirming the consistency of our analytical method. Probabilities associated with were also computed as an illustration of the analytical method.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing this analytical approach, researchers and policymakers can compute the probabilities of any number of desired events related to different COD which can be helpful for public health interventions, resource allocation, informed decision-making and risk assessment, by controlling the underlying attributes responsible for the probabilities to surge and plummet.

摘要

背景与目的

特定病因死亡率(CSM)计数预测在公共卫生政策背景下起着至关重要的作用。在本研究中,我们引入了一种新的分析方法,该方法分为三个阶段,通过计算不同的简单概率、复合概率和条件概率,来回答有关14种特定病因导致的CSM的具体问题。

方法

使用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的每周死亡率计数数据开发了一个多变量时间序列预测模型。通过结合观察到的和预测的死亡率,构建了一个二元数据矩阵,将其作为周数的函数,用于14种死因(COD)。我们引入了两个新概念:每周死亡率计数超标()和死亡率指标每周变化(),这有助于计算与所有COD相关的各种概率。为了检验COD与之间无关联的零假设,进行了独立性卡方检验,而克莱默V统计量用于检验关联强度。使用威尔科克森秩和检验和相关指数来验证该方法。

结果

独立性卡方检验结果表明,COD与之间无统计学显著关联(=0.79)。此外,COD与之间这种关联的效应大小非常小(克莱默V=0.055)。威尔科克森秩和检验结果表明,观察到的计数与预测的计数之间无统计学显著差异(=0.11),证实了我们分析方法的一致性。作为分析方法的示例,还计算了与相关的概率。

结论

利用这种分析方法,研究人员和政策制定者可以计算与不同COD相关的任意数量期望事件的概率,通过控制导致概率激增和暴跌的潜在属性,这有助于公共卫生干预、资源分配、明智决策和风险评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/12434084/dbf904911549/HSR2-8-e71235-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/12434084/dc905f211e69/HSR2-8-e71235-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/12434084/dbf904911549/HSR2-8-e71235-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/12434084/dc905f211e69/HSR2-8-e71235-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d95b/12434084/dbf904911549/HSR2-8-e71235-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Analyzing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Mortality Data Using Weekly Exceedance in Mortality Count and Weekly Change in Mortality Indicator: A Time Series Study.使用死亡率计数的每周超标情况和死亡率指标的每周变化分析疾病控制与预防中心的死亡率数据:一项时间序列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 14;8(9):e71235. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71235. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Taxane monotherapy regimens for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.紫杉烷类单药治疗方案用于复发性上皮性卵巢癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 12;7(7):CD008766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008766.pub3.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
8
Sex as a prognostic factor for mortality in adults with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.性别作为急性症状性肺栓塞成年患者死亡率的一个预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD013835. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013835.pub2.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and tobacco products use among US adults, 2021 National Health Interview Survey.2021年美国成年人中的新冠病毒疾病2019(COVID-19)与烟草制品使用情况,全国健康访谈调查
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 31;6(9):e1542. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1542. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Association of COVID-19 Infection With Incident Diabetes.COVID-19 感染与新发糖尿病的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238866. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8866.
3
Excess diabetes mellitus-related deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
美国新冠疫情期间与糖尿病相关的额外死亡病例。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Dec;54:101671. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101671. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Vaccinations versus Lockdowns to Prevent COVID-19 Mortality.疫苗接种与封锁措施预防新冠病毒死亡情况对比
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 18;10(8):1347. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081347.
5
Association of COVID-19 with New-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.COVID-19 与新发阿尔茨海默病的关联。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;89(2):411-414. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220717.
6
Excess Mortality Versus COVID-19 Death Rates: A Spatial Analysis of Socioeconomic Disparities and Political Allegiance Across U.S. States.超额死亡率与新冠肺炎死亡率:美国各州社会经济差距与政治忠诚度的空间分析
Rev Income Wealth. 2022 Jun;68(2):348-392. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12570. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
7
Development and Validation of a Mortality Prediction Model in Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates.极早早产儿死亡率预测模型的建立与验证。
Neonatology. 2022;119(4):418-427. doi: 10.1159/000524729. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
Diabetes mellitus prediction and diagnosis from a data preprocessing and machine learning perspective.从数据预处理和机器学习角度看糖尿病的预测与诊断
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Jun;220:106773. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106773. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
9
Assessment of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health services use.评估2019冠状病毒病大流行对医疗服务利用的影响。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022 Jun;3:100254. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100254. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
10
A modern approach of survival analysis of patients with pancreatic cancer.一种针对胰腺癌患者的生存分析现代方法。
Am J Cancer Res. 2021 Oct 15;11(10):4725-4745. eCollection 2021.