• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用PACE工具为门诊老年患者开具运动处方的主观和客观决策树的验证

Validation of Subjective and Objective Decisional Trees to prescribe exercise using the pace tool in outpatient older adults.

作者信息

Ruiz F-J-M, Kergoat M-J, Andriamampionona F, Brodeur C, Beauchet O, Tannou T, Buckinx F, Aubertin-Leheudre M

机构信息

Département des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Groupe de Recherche en Activité Physique Adapté, Université du Québec à Montréal, Pavillon des Sciences Biologiques, 141 President-Kennedy Ave, Montreal, QC, SB-4615H3C 3P8, Canada.

Research Center, l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS du Centre-Sud de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Sep 18. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01305-w.

DOI:10.1007/s41999-025-01305-w
PMID:40968248
Abstract

METHODS

A tool called PACE, including two decisional trees (SDT for physicians and ODT for exercise professionals), was co-created to integrate PA prescriptions in outpatient geriatric care. The SDT comprised 13 questions from validated questionnaires (FRAIL, FIND, and SARC-F), and the ODT included four geriatric functional tests (30-s chair test, functional reach test, balance, and normal walking speed). SDT and ODT were administered to ninety-seven patients. Cronbach's alpha, confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson's correlation, Kappa, and Tau-B correlation were conducted.

RESULTS

The SDT and ODT demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.74-0.86 and α = 0.75, respectively). Concurrent validity showed significant correlations between the SDT and indices of frailty and sarcopenia (r = 0.62-0.90, p < 0.001) and objective functional tests (r = 0.66-0.72, p < 0.001). The ODT showed significant correlations with functional tests (r = 0.65-0.88, p < 0.001). Despite some correlations between the decisional trees (r = 0.48-0.68, p < 0.001), their concordance was limited (kappa = 0.08-0.41). Sub-analyses revealed higher correlations and concordances when the caregiver living with the patient was involved in SDT responses.

CONCLUSIONS

The SDT and ODT demonstrated good validity for assessing the functional performance profile of older adults and can be used to prescribe exercise programs using PACE. This study highlights the importance of involving caregivers in the SDT assessment to refine PACE prescriptions.

摘要

方法

共同创建了一种名为PACE的工具,其中包括两个决策树(医生用的SDT和运动专业人员用的ODT),以将体力活动处方纳入老年门诊护理。SDT包含来自经过验证的问卷(FRAIL、FIND和SARC-F)的13个问题,ODT包括四项老年功能测试(30秒椅子测试、功能性伸展测试、平衡和正常步行速度)。对97名患者进行了SDT和ODT测试。进行了克朗巴哈系数分析、验证性因素分析、皮尔逊相关性分析、卡方检验和Tau-B相关性分析。

结果

SDT和ODT显示出良好的内部一致性(分别为α = 0.74 - 0.86和α = 0.75)。同时效度表明,SDT与衰弱和肌肉减少症指标之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.62 - 0.90,p < 0.001),与客观功能测试之间也存在显著相关性(r = 0.66 - 0.72,p < 0.001)。ODT与功能测试之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.65 - 0.88,p < 0.001)。尽管决策树之间存在一些相关性(r = 0.48 - 0.68,p < 0.001),但它们的一致性有限(kappa = 0.08 - 0.41)。亚分析显示,当与患者同住的护理人员参与SDT回答时,相关性和一致性更高。

结论

SDT和ODT在评估老年人的功能表现方面显示出良好的效度,可用于使用PACE开具运动计划。本研究强调了让护理人员参与SDT评估以完善PACE处方的重要性。

相似文献

1
Validation of Subjective and Objective Decisional Trees to prescribe exercise using the pace tool in outpatient older adults.使用PACE工具为门诊老年患者开具运动处方的主观和客观决策树的验证
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Sep 18. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01305-w.
2
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the SARC-F questionnaire among Iranian older adults.SARC - F问卷波斯语版本在伊朗老年人中的效度和信度。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06214-y.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Intrarater and Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the 3-Meter Backward Walk Test in Non-frail, Pre-frail, and Frail Older Adults in Residential Care Homes.3米向后步行测试在养老院非衰弱、衰弱前期和衰弱老年人中的评分者内与评分者间信度及同时效度
Phys Ther. 2025 Jun 2;105(6). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaf066.
6
Reliability and validity of the Standardized swallowing assessment among community-dwelling older adults in China.中国社区居住老年人标准化吞咽评估的信度与效度
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2548980. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2548980. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Gait parameters and daily physical activity for distinguishing pre-frail, frail, and non-frail older adults: A scoping review.用于区分衰弱前期、衰弱和非衰弱老年人的步态参数及日常身体活动:一项范围综述
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 May 14;29(7):100580. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100580.
9
Ability of Heart Rate Recovery and Gait Kinetics in a Single Wearable to Predict Frailty: Quasiexperimental Pilot Study.心率恢复能力和步态动力学在单一可穿戴设备中的应用:准实验性初步研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 3;8:e58110. doi: 10.2196/58110.
10
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research.在护理研究中确定用于开发和验证问卷的合适样本量。
Belitung Nurs J. 2021 Oct 28;7(5):356-360. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1927. eCollection 2021.
2
The degree of frailty as a translational measure of health in aging.衰弱程度作为衡量衰老健康的转化指标。
Nat Aging. 2021 Aug;1(8):651-665. doi: 10.1038/s43587-021-00099-3. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
3
Implementation, Feasibility, and Acceptability of MATCH to Prevent Iatrogenic Disability in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Question of Geriatric Care Program?
MATCH预防住院老年患者医源性残疾的实施、可行性及可接受性:老年护理计划的问题?
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 20;11(8):1186. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081186.
4
Facilitators and barriers to enhancing physical activity in older patients during acute hospital stay: a systematic review.促进和阻碍老年患者在急性住院期间增加身体活动的因素:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Jul 30;19(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01330-z.
5
International Exercise Recommendations in Older Adults (ICFSR): Expert Consensus Guidelines.国际老年人运动建议(ICFSR):专家共识指南。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(7):824-853. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1665-8.
6
The reliability and validity of the 30-seconds sit-to-stand test and its capacity for assessment of the functional status of hemodialysis patients.30 秒坐站测试的可靠性和有效性及其评估血液透析患者功能状态的能力。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jul;27:157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the SARC-F and Its Modified Versions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.SARC-F 及其修订版的可靠性和同时效度的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Sep;22(9):1864-1876.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
8
Unsupervised home-based resistance training for community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.社区居住老年人的非监督家庭基础抗阻训练:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Aug;69:101368. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101368. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
SPPB reference values and performance in assessing sarcopenia in community-dwelling Singaporeans - Yishun study.握力、步速和身体活动能力简表(SPPB)参考值及其在评估新加坡义顺社区居民肌肉减少症中的表现——义顺研究
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02147-4.
10
Validity, reliability, and measurement error of a sit-to-stand power test in older adults: A pre-registered study.老年人坐立起身力量测试的有效性、可靠性和测量误差:一项预先注册的研究。
Exp Gerontol. 2021 Mar;145:111202. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111202. Epub 2020 Dec 19.