Javiya Piyush, Punnen Chinju, Chaudhari Dipak, Sharma Paridhi, Pradhan Snehamoy, Sharma Deepak, Mehta Miral
Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, K. M. Shah Dental College & Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Piparia, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Taluka-Karad, Dist-Satara, Maharashtra, India.
Bioinformation. 2025 Jun 30;21(6):1514-1517. doi: 10.6026/973206300211514. eCollection 2025.
The evaluation between titanium and polymer abutments regarding peri-implant soft tissue health took place in a study involving 40 patients with posterior implants. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the plaque index (PI), Bleeding on probing (BOP) and Probing depth (PD) together with radiographic bone level assessments at three specified time points: baseline and 3 months as well as 6 months. The clinical assessment of Group B (polymer) at 6 months revealed superior outcomes including a decreased PI score to 0.88 alongside reduced BOP to 10% and contractions in PD up to 2.6 mm compared to 0.92 PI, 15% BOP and 2.9 mm PD. Group B participants showed smaller marginal bone loss than Group A with differences at 0.38 mm vs. 0.45 mm although results were not statistically meaningful. Patients obtained better results from polymer abutments although both types of abutment functioned properly.
在一项涉及40名后牙种植患者的研究中，对钛基台和聚合物基台在种植体周围软组织健康方面进行了评估。因此，在三个特定时间点评估菌斑指数（PI）、探诊出血（BOP）、探诊深度（PD）以及影像学骨水平具有重要意义，这三个时间点分别为基线、3个月和6个月。B组（聚合物基台）在6个月时的临床评估显示出更好的结果，包括PI评分降至0.88，BOP降至10%，PD收缩至2.6mm，而A组的PI为0.92，BOP为15%，PD为2.9mm。B组参与者的边缘骨丢失比A组小，分别为0.38mm和0.45mm，尽管结果无统计学意义。尽管两种基台功能均正常，但患者使用聚合物基台获得了更好的结果。
