Pope Leah, Chang Bernard, McClave Michelle, O'Byrne Sheila Marie, Muhammad Kawthar, Abedin Zainab, Purcell Mary, Nair Anjana, Zalcgendler Kayla, Reilly Muredach P
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug 7;9(1):e188. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10118. eCollection 2025.
Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) offer a range of resources to support clinical and translational research and science. However, research professionals often face challenges in navigating these resources effectively.
Our study sought to examine research navigation services across CTSA hubs to identify successful strategies, common challenges, and best practices for supporting research teams.
We conducted interviews with representatives from ten CTSA hubs and performed a landscape analysis to explore the types of research navigation services available, the methods of advertising and orienting faculty and staff, and the challenges faced in launching and maintaining these services.
Our analysis identified three primary types of research navigation services offered at CTSA hubs: online resource libraries, personalized research navigation with dedicated staff, and interdisciplinary research "studios" for protocol development. Despite these offerings, challenges such as low awareness, difficulties coordinating across siloed university systems, and limited metrics for evaluating navigation services persist.
Effective research navigation requires a combination of web-based applications and in-person support, backed by institutional commitment to foster engagement and streamline access. Key strategies for successful navigation services include proactive advertising, integration with orientation programs, and cross-departmental collaboration. Our findings offer actionable recommendations for enhancing research navigation at AMCs, ultimately aiming to increase research productivity and collaboration.
拥有临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)的学术医疗中心(AMC)提供一系列资源以支持临床和转化研究与科学。然而,研究专业人员在有效利用这些资源方面常常面临挑战。
我们的研究旨在考察CTSA各中心的研究导航服务,以确定支持研究团队的成功策略、常见挑战和最佳实践。
我们对十个CTSA中心的代表进行了访谈,并进行了态势分析,以探索可用的研究导航服务类型、宣传和指导教职员工的方法,以及推出和维持这些服务所面临的挑战。
我们的分析确定了CTSA中心提供的三种主要研究导航服务类型:在线资源库、配备专职人员的个性化研究导航,以及用于方案制定的跨学科研究“工作室”。尽管有这些服务,但仍存在一些挑战,如认知度低、跨孤立的大学系统协调困难,以及评估导航服务的指标有限。
有效的研究导航需要基于网络的应用程序和面对面支持相结合,并得到机构致力于促进参与和简化获取途径的支持。成功的导航服务的关键策略包括积极宣传、与迎新项目整合以及跨部门协作。我们的研究结果为加强AMC的研究导航提供了可操作的建议,最终目标是提高研究生产力和协作。