• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于临床和转化科学的利益相关者参与方法导航网络工具。

A stakeholder engagement method navigator webtool for clinical and translational science.

作者信息

Kwan Bethany M, Ytell Kate, Coors Marilyn, DeCamp Matthew, Morse Brad, Ressalam Julie, Reno Jenna E, Himber Meleah, Maertens Julie, Wearner Robyn, Gordon Kaylee, Wynia Matthew K

机构信息

The Data Science to Patient Value Initiative, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

The Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep 13;5(1):e180. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.850. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2021.850
PMID:34849255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8596067/
Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is increasingly expected by funders and valued by researchers in clinical and translational science, yet many researchers lack access to expert consultation or training in selecting appropriate stakeholder engagement methods. We describe the development of a novel Stakeholder Engagement Navigator webtool. We conducted an environmental scan and literature review, along with investigator interviews, surveys, and engagement expert facilitated group discussion. We formally reviewed and cataloged 29 distinct engagement methods. To develop the webtool, we used an iterative design process that followed Design Thinking phases: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test. As prioritized during user testing, the Stakeholder Engagement Navigator webtool both educates and guides investigators in selecting an engagement method based on key criteria. The V1.0 Navigator webtool filters methods first by purpose of engagement (noted by 62% of users as the highest priority criteria), then by budget, time per stakeholder interaction, and total interactions. The tool is available at DICEMethods.org. The Stakeholder Engagement Navigator webtool is a user-centered, interactive webtool suitable for use by researchers seeking guidance on appropriate stakeholder engagement methods for clinical and translational research projects.

摘要

资助者越来越期望利益相关者参与,临床和转化科学领域的研究人员也重视这种参与,但许多研究人员在选择合适的利益相关者参与方法时,缺乏获得专家咨询或培训的机会。我们描述了一种新型的利益相关者参与导航网络工具的开发过程。我们进行了环境扫描和文献综述,同时开展了研究者访谈、调查以及由参与专家主持的小组讨论。我们正式审查并编目了29种不同的参与方法。为开发该网络工具,我们采用了遵循设计思维阶段的迭代设计过程:共情、定义、构思、原型制作和测试。正如在用户测试中所确定的优先级那样,利益相关者参与导航网络工具既能教育研究者,又能根据关键标准指导他们选择参与方法。V1.0版导航网络工具首先根据参与目的对方法进行筛选(62%的用户将其列为最高优先级标准),然后再根据预算、与每个利益相关者互动的时间以及总互动次数进行筛选。该工具可在DICEMethods.org上获取。利益相关者参与导航网络工具是以用户为中心的交互式网络工具,适合那些在临床和转化研究项目中寻求合适的利益相关者参与方法指导的研究人员使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97b/8596067/af61a6a4173a/S2059866121008505_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97b/8596067/433f29e51661/S2059866121008505_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97b/8596067/578702c4c597/S2059866121008505_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97b/8596067/af61a6a4173a/S2059866121008505_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97b/8596067/433f29e51661/S2059866121008505_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97b/8596067/578702c4c597/S2059866121008505_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97b/8596067/af61a6a4173a/S2059866121008505_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
A stakeholder engagement method navigator webtool for clinical and translational science.一种用于临床和转化科学的利益相关者参与方法导航网络工具。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep 13;5(1):e180. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.850. eCollection 2021.
2
The iPRISM webtool: an interactive tool to pragmatically guide the iterative use of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model in public health and clinical settings.iPRISM网络工具:一种交互式工具,用于在公共卫生和临床环境中切实指导实用、稳健实施与可持续性模型的迭代使用。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Sep 19;4(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00494-4.
3
4
Co-creation of the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator: a multi-stakeholder initiative to ensure the patient voice is represented in health decision-making.全球患者体验数据导航器的共同创建:一项多利益相关方倡议,以确保患者的声音在健康决策中得到体现。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00503-9.
5
Co-creation of practical "how-to guides" for patient engagement in key phases of medicines development-from theory to implementation.共同创建实用的“操作指南”,以促进患者在药物研发关键阶段的参与——从理论到实践。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Aug 23;7(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00294-x.
6
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.迈向实施利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM),以改善医疗保健服务。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
7
Engagement science: The core of dissemination, implementation, and translational research science.参与式科学:传播、实施及转化研究科学的核心
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):216-218. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.8.
8
Facilitating stakeholder engagement in early stage translational research.促进利益相关者参与早期转化研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235400. eCollection 2020.
9
The Process and Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Developing a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Communication and Decision-Making Intervention.利益相关者参与制定儿科重症监护病房沟通与决策干预措施的过程及影响
J Patient Exp. 2016 Dec;3(4):108-118. doi: 10.1177/2374373516685950. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
Stakeholder engagement in eight comparative effectiveness trials in African Americans and Latinos with asthma.利益相关者参与针对非裔美国人和拉丁裔哮喘患者的八项比较疗效试验。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 24;8(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00399-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Clinical and Translational Science Award compendium of dissemination and implementation science resource catalogs: Capacity building tools for clinical and translational scientists.临床与转化科学奖传播与实施科学资源目录汇编:临床与转化科学家的能力建设工具。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jun 30;9(1):e154. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10087. eCollection 2025.
2
Engagement Methods in Brain Tumor Genomic Research: Multimethod Comparative Study.脑肿瘤基因组研究中的参与方法:多方法比较研究
J Particip Med. 2025 Aug 21;17:e68852. doi: 10.2196/68852.
3
Adaptation of the brainwriting premortem technique to inform the co-creation of COVID-19 testing strategies in underserved communities in South San Diego.

本文引用的文献

1
Engagement science: The core of dissemination, implementation, and translational research science.参与式科学:传播、实施及转化研究科学的核心
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):216-218. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.8.
2
Network Engagement in Action: Stakeholder Engagement Activities to Enhance Patient-centeredness of Research.网络参与行动:提升研究以患者为中心的利益相关者参与活动。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S66-S74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001264.
3
From community engagement, to community-engaged research, to broadly engaged team science.
将头脑书写预演技术改编应用于南圣地亚哥服务欠缺社区,以协助制定新冠肺炎检测策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10341-w.
4
Community Engagement in Behavioral Medicine: A Scoping Review.社区参与行为医学:范围综述。
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Dec;31(6):1018-1034. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10242-6. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
5
Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study.参与一项DNA完整性队列研究的共同创造与参与。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 22;7(1):e122. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.556. eCollection 2023.
6
Using ethnographic approaches to document, evaluate, and facilitate virtual community-engaged implementation research.运用民族志方法记录、评估和促进虚拟社区参与式实施研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15299-2.
从社区参与,到社区参与式研究,再到广泛参与的团队科学。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr 12;1(1):5-6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.1. eCollection 2017 Feb.
4
Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact.定性探索让患者作为顾问参与证据综合计划:共同构建科学以增强影响力。
Med Care. 2019 Oct;57 Suppl 10 Suppl 3(10 Suppl 3):S246-S252. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001174.
5
Online Resources for Dissemination and Implementation Science: Meeting Demand and Lessons Learned.传播与实施科学的在线资源:满足需求及经验教训
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Oct;2(5):259-266. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.337. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.患者参与研究:患者中心的结局研究所的初步发现。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):359-367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067.
7
Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities.患者利益相关者参与研究:描述基础原则和最佳实践活动的叙述性综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):307-316. doi: 10.1111/hex.12873. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
"Still learning and evolving in our approaches": patient and stakeholder engagement among Canadian community-based primary health care researchers.“仍在学习并不断改进我们的方法”:加拿大社区基层医疗保健研究人员中的患者及利益相关者参与情况
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 3;4:47. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0132-0. eCollection 2018.
9
Applying a community-based participatory research framework to patient and family engagement in the development of patient-centered outcomes research and practice.将基于社区的参与式研究框架应用于患者和家属参与以患者为中心的结局研究和实践的发展。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Sep 8;8(5):683-691. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx026.
10
Moving patient-oriented research forward: thoughts from the next generation of knowledge translation researchers.推动以患者为导向的研究向前发展:下一代知识转化研究人员的思考。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Aug 1;4:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0110-6. eCollection 2018.