Nakazono Tetsuharu, Amano Satoru, Saita Kazuya, Takahashi Kayoko
Department of Rehabilitation, Kitasato University Hospital, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Japan.
Phys Ther Res. 2025;28(2):137-144. doi: 10.1298/ptr.E10324. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
In stroke rehabilitation, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) motor scale is widely used to assess consecutive recovery steps from motor paralysis and predict prognosis after stroke. However, there has been limited opportunity to refer to the useful yet few studies that evaluated the minimal important change (MIC) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the FMA-LE motor scale. The aims of this review were to: (1) identify studies that have estimated the MIC and MDC, (2) identify the calculated MIC and MDC values and disease phases in previous studies, and (3) assess the methodological quality of the MIC and MDC studies of the FMA-LE motor scale.
A scoping review was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. 3 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science) were used for the literature search. Reports of the MIC and MDC of the FMA-LE motor scale in patients with stroke were selected.
6 studies were included after confirming their eligibility. In the acute phase, inter-rater MDC was 3.23 points. In the early subacute phase, intra-rater MDC was 1.24 points. In the chronic phase, intra-rater MDC was 3.80, 4.87, and 7.98 points, inter-rater MDC was 3.57 and 5.96 points, and MIC was 6.00 points.
No late subacute threshold was identified for the MDC, and no acute or subacute threshold was identified for the MIC. Compared with the quality of the MIC study, there is room for improvement in the quality of the MDC studies with respect to study design.
在脑卒中康复中,Fugl-Meyer评估下肢运动量表(FMA-LE)被广泛用于评估从运动麻痹开始的连续恢复阶段,并预测脑卒中后的预后。然而,评估FMA-LE运动量表最小重要变化(MIC)和最小可检测变化(MDC)的有用但数量有限的研究,可供参考的机会不多。本综述的目的是:(1)识别估计MIC和MDC的研究;(2)识别先前研究中计算出的MIC和MDC值以及疾病阶段;(3)评估FMA-LE运动量表MIC和MDC研究的方法学质量。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)建议进行范围综述。使用3个数据库(PubMed、CINAHL和科学网)进行文献检索。选取脑卒中患者FMA-LE运动量表MIC和MDC的报告。
确认符合纳入标准后,纳入了6项研究。在急性期,评分者间MDC为3.23分。在亚急性早期,评分者内MDC为1.24分。在慢性期,评分者内MDC分别为3.80、4.87和7.98分,评分者间MDC分别为3.57和5.96分,MIC为6.00分。
未确定MDC的亚急性后期阈值,也未确定MIC的急性或亚急性阈值。与MIC研究的质量相比,MDC研究在研究设计质量方面仍有改进空间。