Marangoni Davide, Barbiero Anna, Spinicci Michele, Bartoloni Alessandro, Rossanese Andrea, Bonanni Paolo, Zammarchi Lorenzo
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Infect Dis Rep. 2025 Sep 17;17(5):117. doi: 10.3390/idr17050117.
Dengue virus infection is a significant challenge for global health, with 100 million symptomatic cases, 2.3 million DALYs and 20,000 deaths annually. Dengue vaccines must provide long-lasting immunity against all four virus serotypes, especially in dengue-naïve individuals, in order to avoid the severe manifestations of secondary infections. This scoping review summarizes current evidence on licensed dengue vaccines and vaccine candidates, focusing on immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety outcomes. To identify relevant trials, in October 2023 we queried ClinicalTrials.gov using the search term "dengue vaccines" to identify past and present vaccine candidates; the search was repeated in February 2025. Vaccines were categorized into licensed (CYD-TDV and TAK-003), late-stage (TV003/TV005), and early-stage candidates (TDEN, DPIV, V180, TVDV). CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia) showed moderate efficacy in large trials, with higher efficacy in seropositive than in seronegative individuals. Following commercialization, an increased hospitalization risk was discovered in the latter group. Due to these findings and impossibility of screening for prior exposure in endemic settings newer vaccines are now preferred and CYD-TDV production has recently been discontinued due to declining demand. TAK-003 (Qdenga) demonstrated high efficacy against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and dengue-related hospitalization. This vaccine was generally well tolerated and is currently recommended by scientific societies and national authorities for travelers and by WHO for routine use in adults and children in endemic settings. TV003 and TV005, developed by NIAID, showed strong immunogenicity and efficacy in phase II trials and human challenge models. Preliminary results show that a single-dose of TV003 has an efficacy of 79.6% in seronegatives and 89.2% in seropositives against VCD at a 2-year follow-up. Both formulations elicited tetravalent responses with an acceptable safety profile. Other vaccine strategies, including TDEN (live-attenuated), DPIV (purified inactivated), V180 (subunit), and TVDV (DNA-based) are still in early-phase development and suffer from waning antibody titers and limited efficacy in naïve subjects. The development of a safe and effective vaccine remains complex due to immunologic challenges. Currently, TAK-003 is regarded as the best option for broad implementation, while TV003 and TV005 remain promising candidates due to their shorter schedule and robust immunogenicity. Further research is needed to optimize vaccine strategies in seronegative populations, immunocompromised subjects, older adults, and travelers.
登革病毒感染是全球卫生面临的一项重大挑战,每年有1亿例有症状病例、230万伤残调整生命年以及2万例死亡。登革疫苗必须提供针对所有四种病毒血清型的持久免疫力,尤其是在初次感染登革病毒的个体中,以避免二次感染的严重表现。本综述总结了关于已获许可的登革疫苗和候选疫苗的现有证据,重点关注免疫原性、有效性和安全性结果。为了识别相关试验,2023年10月我们在ClinicalTrials.gov上使用搜索词“登革疫苗”查询,以识别过去和现在的候选疫苗;2025年2月重复了该搜索。疫苗被分为已获许可的(CYD-TDV和TAK-003)、后期的(TV003/TV005)和早期候选疫苗(TDEN、DPIV、V180、TVDV)。CYD-TDV(登革热疫苗)在大型试验中显示出中等效力,血清阳性个体中的效力高于血清阴性个体。商业化后,发现后一组的住院风险增加。由于这些发现以及在流行地区无法筛查既往暴露情况,现在更倾向于使用新型疫苗,并且由于需求下降,CYD-TDV的生产最近已停止。TAK-003(Qdenga)对病毒学确诊的登革热(VCD)和登革热相关住院表现出高效力。这种疫苗总体耐受性良好,目前科学协会和国家当局推荐给旅行者,世界卫生组织推荐在流行地区用于成人和儿童的常规接种。由美国国立过敏与传染病研究所开发的TV003和TV005在II期试验和人体挑战模型中显示出强大的免疫原性和效力。初步结果表明,在2年随访时,单剂量TV003对血清阴性个体抗VCD的效力为79.6%,对血清阳性个体为89.2%。两种制剂均引发了四价反应,安全性可接受。其他疫苗策略,包括TDEN(减毒活疫苗)、DPIV(纯化灭活疫苗)、V180(亚单位疫苗)和TVDV(基于DNA的疫苗)仍处于早期开发阶段,并且存在抗体滴度下降和在初次感染个体中效力有限的问题。由于免疫方面的挑战,开发一种安全有效的疫苗仍然很复杂。目前,TAK-003被认为是广泛应用的最佳选择,而TV003和TV005由于接种程序更短和强大的免疫原性仍然是有前景的候选疫苗。需要进一步研究以优化血清阴性人群、免疫功能低下者、老年人和旅行者的疫苗策略。