• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Human foraging strategies flexibly adapt to resource distribution and time constraints.

作者信息

Simonelli Valeria, Nuzzi Davide, Lancia Gian Luca, Pezzulo Giovanni

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.

University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Sep 22. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01347-4.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-025-01347-4
PMID:40983799
Abstract

Foraging is a crucial activity, yet the extent to which humans employ flexible versus rigid strategies remains unclear. This study investigates how individuals adapt their foraging strategies in response to resource distribution and foraging time constraints. For this, we designed a video-game-like foraging task that requires participants to navigate a four-area environment to collect coins from treasure boxes within a limited time. This task engages multiple cognitive abilities, such as navigation, learning, and memorization of treasure box locations. Findings indicate that participants adjust their foraging strategies - encompassing both stay-or-leave decisions, such as the number of boxes opened in initial areas and behavioral aspects, such as the time to navigate from box to box - depending on both resource distribution and foraging time. Additionally, they improved their performance over time by reducing the uncertainty about resource locations and distributions, demonstrating enhancements in both foraging strategies and navigation skills. They also adapted their strategies within trials based on their uncertainty, leaving areas more quickly when they resolved that other areas offered better foraging opportunities, and more slowly when they became certain that the alternatives were poorer. Finally, participants' performance was initially distant from the reward-maximizing performance of optimal agents due to the learning process humans undergo. However, it approximated the optimal agent's performance towards the end of the task, without fully reaching it. These results highlight the flexibility of human foraging behavior and underscore the importance of employing optimality models and ecologically rich scenarios to study foraging.

摘要

相似文献

1
Human foraging strategies flexibly adapt to resource distribution and time constraints.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Sep 22. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01347-4.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Policy shaping based on the learned preferences of others accounts for risky decision-making under social observation.基于对他人学习偏好的政策塑造解释了社会观察下的风险决策。
Elife. 2025 Sep 12;13:RP102228. doi: 10.7554/eLife.102228.
5
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
7
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
9
Dopamine Modulates Dynamic Decision-Making during Foraging.多巴胺调节觅食过程中的动态决策。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;40(27):5273-5282. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2586-19.2020. Epub 2020 May 26.
10
The roles of online and offline replay in planning.在线和离线回放在规划中的作用。
Elife. 2020 Jun 17;9:e56911. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56911.

本文引用的文献

1
Attention deficits linked with proclivity to explore while foraging.注意力缺陷与觅食时的探索倾向有关。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Feb 28;291(2017):20222584. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2584. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
2
Understanding patch foraging strategies across development.了解不同发育阶段的斑块觅食策略。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Nov;27(11):1085-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
3
Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty.时间压力改变了人们探索和应对不确定性的方式。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 8;12(1):4122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07901-1.
4
Should I stay or should I go? Pigeons' (Columba livia) performance of a foraging task has implications for optimal foraging theory and serial pattern learning.我是去还是留?鸽子(Columba livia)在觅食任务中的表现对最优觅食理论和序列模式学习具有启示意义。
J Comp Psychol. 2021 May;135(2):266-272. doi: 10.1037/com0000263. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Biased belief updating and suboptimal choice in foraging decisions.在觅食决策中存在有偏差的信念更新和次优选择。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 9;11(1):3417. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16964-5.
6
A neuronal theory of sequential economic choice.一种关于序列经济选择的神经元理论。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 Apr 13;2:2398212818766675. doi: 10.1177/2398212818766675. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
7
Behavioural variability contributes to over-staying in patchy foraging.行为变异性导致在斑块状觅食中停留时间过长。
Biol Lett. 2020 Mar;16(3):20190915. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0915. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology.决策神经科学中的基础觅食:来自行为生态学的启示。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jul;19(7):419-427. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0010-7.
9
Hierarchical Active Inference: A Theory of Motivated Control.分层主动推理:动机控制理论。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):294-306. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
10
A Primer on Foraging and the Explore/Exploit Trade-Off for Psychiatry Research.精神病学研究中的觅食及探索/利用权衡入门
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Sep;42(10):1931-1939. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.108. Epub 2017 May 29.