• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Visual Beauty Assessment Scale: Psychometric Validation of Italian and English Versions.视觉美感评估量表:意大利语和英语版本的心理测量学验证
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Sep;62(6):e70259. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70259.
2
The development of a novel, standardized, norm-referenced Arabic Discourse Assessment Tool (ADAT), including an examination of psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia.开发一种新型、标准化、基于常模的阿拉伯语语篇评估工具(ADAT),包括评估失语症患者语篇测量的心理测量特性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):2103-2117. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13083. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
5
The agreement of phonetic transcriptions between paediatric speech and language therapists transcribing a disordered speech sample.儿科言语和语言治疗师转写语音样本的音标转录的一致性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1981-1995. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13043. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
6
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
7
Development and validation of an adolescent health literacy scale in Ethiopia: A mixed methods approach.埃塞俄比亚青少年健康素养量表的开发与验证:一种混合方法研究
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0329184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329184. eCollection 2025.
8
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
9
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.

本文引用的文献

1
A Kinetic Ecological Approach to Beauty Perception: A Perspective Review on the Case of Symmetry and the Golden Ratio.一种关于美感认知的动力学生态方法:关于对称性与黄金分割案例的视角性综述
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Apr;61(8):e70119. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70119.
2
Neural correlates of the experience of ugliness.丑陋体验的神经关联。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Oct;60(7):5671-5679. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16517. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
A premium for positive social interest and attractive voices in the acceptability of unfair offers? An ERP study.积极的社会兴趣和有吸引力的声音是否会提高不公平提议的可接受性?一项 ERP 研究。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Jul;60(2):4078-4094. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16422. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
The neural determinants of abstract beauty.抽象美的神经决定因素。
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Feb;57(4):633-645. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15912. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
5
Inside the Michelangelo effect: The role of art and aesthetic attractiveness on perceived fatigue and hand kinematics in virtual painting.米开朗基罗效应内部:艺术和美学吸引力在虚拟绘画中对手疲劳和运动学的影响。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):748-754. doi: 10.1002/pchj.606. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
6
BeauVis: A Validated Scale for Measuring the Aesthetic Pleasure of Visual Representations.BeauVis:一种用于测量视觉表现审美愉悦感的有效量表。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2023 Jan;29(1):363-373. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209390. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
7
The golden ratio as an ecological affordance leading to aesthetic attractiveness.黄金比例作为一种生态可供性,导致了美学吸引力。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):729-740. doi: 10.1002/pchj.505. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
8
Comparable performance on a spatial memory task in data collected in the lab and online.在实验室和在线收集的数据中,空间记忆任务的表现相当。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0259367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259367. eCollection 2021.
9
The neural determinants of beauty.美之神经学基础。
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Jan;55(1):91-106. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15543. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
10
Familiarity and Novelty in Aesthetic Preference: The Effects of the Properties of the Artwork and the Beholder.审美偏好中的熟悉与新奇:艺术品特性与观赏者的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 23;12:694927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.694927. eCollection 2021.

视觉美感评估量表:意大利语和英语版本的心理测量学验证

Visual Beauty Assessment Scale: Psychometric Validation of Italian and English Versions.

作者信息

Iosa Marco, Salera Claudia, Antonucci Gabriella, De Bartolo Daniela

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

SmArt Lab, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Sep;62(6):e70259. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70259.

DOI:10.1111/ejn.70259
PMID:40990803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12459320/
Abstract

Since ancient times, philosophers and researchers have attempted to define beauty. In recent years, psychologists have distinguished between subjective and objective beauty, as well as between emotional and cognitive dimensions. However, a psychometrically validated tool for assessing beauty is still lacking. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate the Visual Beauty Assessment Scale (Vi-BAS). Across three experiments, 18 items were generated based on participants' definition of beauty (Experiment 1), and their validity and reliability were assessed in Italian native speakers (Experiment 2) and English native speakers (Experiment 3). Exploratory factorial analysis (EFA) was conducted in Experiment 2 to identify latent variables, which were confirmed in Experiment 3. Results identified four latent variables of beauty-subjective, objective, emotional, and cognitive-each represented in the Vi-BAS by two valid and reliable items, for a total of eight items. An average Vi-BAS score was also validated. This study introduces a comprehensive scale for assessing different dimensions of beauty, demonstrating validity and reliability both in Italian and English.

摘要

自古以来,哲学家和研究人员就试图定义美。近年来,心理学家区分了主观美和客观美,以及情感维度和认知维度。然而,仍缺乏一种经过心理测量验证的评估美的工具。本研究的目的是开发并验证视觉美感评估量表(Vi-BAS)。在三个实验中,根据参与者对美的定义生成了18个项目(实验1),并在意大利语母语者(实验2)和英语母语者(实验3)中评估了这些项目的有效性和可靠性。在实验2中进行探索性因子分析(EFA)以识别潜在变量,并在实验3中得到了证实。结果确定了美的四个潜在变量——主观、客观、情感和认知——每个变量在Vi-BAS中由两个有效且可靠的项目表示,总共八个项目。还验证了Vi-BAS的平均得分。本研究引入了一个用于评估美的不同维度的综合量表,在意大利语和英语中均证明了其有效性和可靠性。