Mille Jonathan, Charlton Danielle, de Ruiter Marleen C, Stevens Raphael, Haklay Muki, Edwards Stephen J
Department of Earth Sciences, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
UCL Climate Action Unit, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
iScience. 2025 Aug 8;28(9):113320. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113320. eCollection 2025 Sep 19.
Climate change and the evolving global energy landscape pose intertwined escalating challenges for risk management, driven by diminishing fossil fuel reserves, mineral dependencies, climate variability, and geopolitical shifts. This article explores the systemic risks and cascading vulnerabilities embedded within energy system changes in a climate change context, focusing on their implications for first responders and disaster risk reduction strategies. The perspective highlights dependencies on fossil fuels, critical minerals, and global supply chains, alongside the new range of risks introduced by renewable energy transition and climate-induced disruptions. Structural and necessary changes required for electrification and decarbonization may complicate energy stability and infrastructure resilience. Particular attention is paid to the operational blind spots that may affect first responders and emergency managers. The article advocates for the inclusion of energy system dynamics in multi-risk assessments and emphasizes the importance of cross-sector collaboration to enhance systemic resilience. By synthesizing interdisciplinary evidence, it provides a strategic foundation for first responders, risk managers, and policymakers to anticipate and adapt to the interlinked risks of a shifting energy paradigm.
气候变化和不断演变的全球能源格局对风险管理构成了相互交织且不断升级的挑战,这些挑战是由化石燃料储备减少、矿产依赖、气候多变性和地缘政治变化驱动的。本文探讨了气候变化背景下能源系统变化中所蕴含的系统性风险和连锁脆弱性,重点关注其对一线应急人员和灾害风险降低策略的影响。该观点强调了对化石燃料、关键矿物和全球供应链的依赖,以及可再生能源转型和气候引发的干扰所带来的一系列新风险。电气化和脱碳所需的结构性和必要变革可能会使能源稳定性和基础设施恢复力变得复杂。特别关注可能影响一线应急人员和应急管理人员的操作盲点。本文主张将能源系统动态纳入多风险评估,并强调跨部门合作对于增强系统恢复力的重要性。通过综合跨学科证据,它为一线应急人员、风险管理人员和政策制定者预测和适应不断变化的能源范式的相互关联风险提供了战略基础。