• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Taxonomic position of (Apiaceae): insights from molecular and morphological evidence.(伞形科)的分类地位:来自分子和形态学证据的见解。
AoB Plants. 2025 Aug 28;17(5):plaf045. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaf045. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
The phylogeny of Seseli (Apiaceae, Apioideae): insights from molecular and morphological data.独活属(伞形科,Apioideae)的系统发育:分子和形态数据的见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03919-9.
3
Phylogenetic Analyses and Plastome Comparison to Confirm the Taxonomic Position of (Apiaceae, Apioideae).系统发育分析和质体基因组比较以确定(伞形科,芹亚科)的分类地位。
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;16(7):823. doi: 10.3390/genes16070823.
4
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
5
Shoulder Arthrogram肩关节造影
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
8
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
9
The 2 Sigma Genus Concept in mammalogy: Lessons from Lasiurus.哺乳动物学中的双西格玛属概念:来自红蝙蝠属的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0325554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325554. eCollection 2025.
10
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrative Taxonomy for Species Delimitation: A Case Study in Two Widely Accepted Yet Morphologically Confounding Rosa Species Within Sect. Pimpinellifoliae (Rosaceae).用于物种界定的综合分类学:委陵菜蔷薇组(蔷薇科)中两个广泛认可但形态易混淆的蔷薇物种的案例研究
Mol Ecol. 2025 Apr 26:e17779. doi: 10.1111/mec.17779.
2
Morphology, phylogeography, phylogeny, and taxonomy of (Apiaceae).(伞形科)的形态学、系统地理学、系统发育和分类学。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jan 8;15:1504734. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1504734. eCollection 2024.
3
A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics.一种用于比较基因组学的系统发育方法。
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Jun;26(6):395-405. doi: 10.1038/s41576-024-00803-0. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
4
The Micromorphology and Its Taxonomic Value of the Genus L. in China (Apiaceae).中国唇形科L.属的微形态特征及其分类学价值(伞形科)
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jun 13;13(12):1635. doi: 10.3390/plants13121635.
5
The complete plastomes of thirteen Libanotis (Apiaceae, Apioideae) plants: comparative and phylogenetic analyses provide insights into the plastome evolution and taxonomy of Libanotis.十三份藁本属(伞形科,当归属)植物的完整质体基因组:比较和系统发育分析为藁本属的质体基因组进化和分类学提供了见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Feb 12;24(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04784-4.
6
CPJSdraw: analysis and visualization of junction sites of chloroplast genomes.CPJSdraw:叶绿体基因组连接点的分析和可视化。
PeerJ. 2023 May 10;11:e15326. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15326. eCollection 2023.
7
The phylogeny of Seseli (Apiaceae, Apioideae): insights from molecular and morphological data.独活属(伞形科,Apioideae)的系统发育:分子和形态数据的见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03919-9.
8
New insights into the phylogeny and taxonomy of Chinese (Apiaceae).中国伞形科系统发育与分类学的新见解。
PhytoKeys. 2021 Mar 23;175:67-88. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.175.57681. eCollection 2021.
9
New insights into the phylogeny of (Apiaceae, Apioideae) based on morphological and molecular data.基于形态学和分子数据对(伞形科,芹亚科)系统发育的新见解。
PhytoKeys. 2021 Mar 17;175:13-32. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.175.60592. eCollection 2021.
10
Chloroplot: An Online Program for the Versatile Plotting of Organelle Genomes.Chloroplot:一个用于细胞器基因组多功能绘图的在线程序。
Front Genet. 2020 Sep 25;11:576124. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.576124. eCollection 2020.

(伞形科)的分类地位:来自分子和形态学证据的见解。

Taxonomic position of (Apiaceae): insights from molecular and morphological evidence.

作者信息

Li Yang-Zhao, Cai Jing, Li Zi-Xuan, He Xing-Jin, Zhou Song-Dong

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

AoB Plants. 2025 Aug 28;17(5):plaf045. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaf045. eCollection 2025 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/aobpla/plaf045
PMID:41001084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12459255/
Abstract

Speciation arises from multifaceted factors, making phenotype-based classifications unreliable. Integrative taxonomy has advanced significant breakthroughs in taxonomically challenging groups like Apiaceae, which is characterized by highly convergent morphological traits across species. The genus (Apiaceae) has long presented persistent taxonomic uncertainties. While morphological similarities initially supported as sect. , phylogenetic studies consistently resolve within the tribe Echinophoreae, contrasting with (tribe Selineae). Integrated morphological and molecular analyses were conducted here to resolve this taxonomic conflict. Phylogenetic reconstructions based on nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastomes all supported that and formed a stable monophyletic group with and within Echinophoreae, separate from . Plastome comparisons across 14 taxa revealed structural conservation in , , , and , particularly in inverted-repeat and single-copy regions, distinct from that of other species. A unique inversion involving the , , and genes was detected in and but absent in and . Shared morphological characteristics, including glabrous stem bases, basally free bracteoles, and prominent calyx teeth, further support their affinity with . We therefore propose to recognize as a separate genus rather than as sect. and reclassifying and into it. In conclusion, this study not only revealed the phylogenetic position of the tribe Echinophoreae but also resolved the long-standing taxonomic controversy surrounding and .

摘要

物种形成源于多方面因素,这使得基于表型的分类不可靠。综合分类学在诸如伞形科等分类学上具有挑战性的类群中取得了重大突破,伞形科的特点是物种间形态特征高度趋同。[该属名称](伞形科)长期以来一直存在分类学上的不确定性。虽然形态相似性最初支持将[该属名称]作为[另一属名称]的一个组,但系统发育研究始终将[该属名称]归为刺芹族,这与[另一属名称](丝叶芹族)形成对比。在此进行了综合形态学和分子分析,以解决这一分类学冲突。基于核糖体DNA和质体基因组的系统发育重建均支持[该属名称]和[另一属名称]与刺芹族中的[其他两个属名称]和[又一属名称]形成一个稳定的单系群,与[另一属名称]分开。对14个分类群的质体基因组比较显示,[该属名称]、[另一属名称]、[其他两个属名称]和[又一属名称]在结构上具有保守性,特别是在反向重复和单拷贝区域,这与其他[该属名称]物种不同。在[该属名称]和[另一属名称]中检测到一个涉及[某些基因名称]、[某些基因名称]和[某些基因名称]基因的独特倒位,但在[其他两个属名称]和[又一属名称]中不存在。共同的形态特征,包括无毛的茎基部、基部离生的小苞片和突出的萼齿,进一步支持它们与[另一属名称]的亲缘关系。因此,我们建议将[该属名称]视为一个独立的属,而不是作为[另一属名称]的一个组,并将[另一属名称]和[又一属名称]重新分类到该属中。总之,本研究不仅揭示了刺芹族的系统发育位置,还解决了围绕[该属名称]和[另一属名称]的长期分类学争议。