Li Yang-Zhao, Cai Jing, Li Zi-Xuan, He Xing-Jin, Zhou Song-Dong
Key Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, China.
AoB Plants. 2025 Aug 28;17(5):plaf045. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaf045. eCollection 2025 Oct.
Speciation arises from multifaceted factors, making phenotype-based classifications unreliable. Integrative taxonomy has advanced significant breakthroughs in taxonomically challenging groups like Apiaceae, which is characterized by highly convergent morphological traits across species. The genus (Apiaceae) has long presented persistent taxonomic uncertainties. While morphological similarities initially supported as sect. , phylogenetic studies consistently resolve within the tribe Echinophoreae, contrasting with (tribe Selineae). Integrated morphological and molecular analyses were conducted here to resolve this taxonomic conflict. Phylogenetic reconstructions based on nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastomes all supported that and formed a stable monophyletic group with and within Echinophoreae, separate from . Plastome comparisons across 14 taxa revealed structural conservation in , , , and , particularly in inverted-repeat and single-copy regions, distinct from that of other species. A unique inversion involving the , , and genes was detected in and but absent in and . Shared morphological characteristics, including glabrous stem bases, basally free bracteoles, and prominent calyx teeth, further support their affinity with . We therefore propose to recognize as a separate genus rather than as sect. and reclassifying and into it. In conclusion, this study not only revealed the phylogenetic position of the tribe Echinophoreae but also resolved the long-standing taxonomic controversy surrounding and .
物种形成源于多方面因素,这使得基于表型的分类不可靠。综合分类学在诸如伞形科等分类学上具有挑战性的类群中取得了重大突破,伞形科的特点是物种间形态特征高度趋同。[该属名称](伞形科)长期以来一直存在分类学上的不确定性。虽然形态相似性最初支持将[该属名称]作为[另一属名称]的一个组,但系统发育研究始终将[该属名称]归为刺芹族,这与[另一属名称](丝叶芹族)形成对比。在此进行了综合形态学和分子分析,以解决这一分类学冲突。基于核糖体DNA和质体基因组的系统发育重建均支持[该属名称]和[另一属名称]与刺芹族中的[其他两个属名称]和[又一属名称]形成一个稳定的单系群,与[另一属名称]分开。对14个分类群的质体基因组比较显示,[该属名称]、[另一属名称]、[其他两个属名称]和[又一属名称]在结构上具有保守性,特别是在反向重复和单拷贝区域,这与其他[该属名称]物种不同。在[该属名称]和[另一属名称]中检测到一个涉及[某些基因名称]、[某些基因名称]和[某些基因名称]基因的独特倒位,但在[其他两个属名称]和[又一属名称]中不存在。共同的形态特征,包括无毛的茎基部、基部离生的小苞片和突出的萼齿,进一步支持它们与[另一属名称]的亲缘关系。因此,我们建议将[该属名称]视为一个独立的属,而不是作为[另一属名称]的一个组,并将[另一属名称]和[又一属名称]重新分类到该属中。总之,本研究不仅揭示了刺芹族的系统发育位置,还解决了围绕[该属名称]和[另一属名称]的长期分类学争议。