Suppr超能文献

评估护理质量的工具:一项范围综述

Instruments for Assessing Nursing Care Quality: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Correia Patrícia, Bernardes Rafael A, Caldeira Sílvia

机构信息

Unidade Local de Saúde de Santa Maria (ULSSM), Hospital de Santa Maria, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal.

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing (FCSE), Universidade Católica Portuguesa (UCP), 4169-005 Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Nurs Rep. 2025 Sep 19;15(9):342. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15090342.

Abstract

Quality of nursing care (QNC) is a central concept in healthcare systems worldwide, with growing emphasis on developing reliable and contextually appropriate instruments for its assessment. Over recent decades, there has been a shift from outcome-based evaluation toward more holistic, patient-centered frameworks that consider both clinical indicators and interpersonal dimensions of care. This scoping review aimed to map the range, nature, and characteristics of self-report instruments used to assess the quality of nursing care, including their psychometric properties and contextual applications across different clinical settings. A systematic search was conducted in CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, alongside gray literature sources, following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on the development, validation, adaptation, or application of QNC assessment tools in hospital or community nursing contexts, and were published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish. Fifty-nine studies were included, spanning from 1995 to 2025. The instruments identified were predominantly structured around Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model, and many emphasized relational domains such as empathy, communication, and respect. Tools like the Good Nursing Care Scale (GNCS), the Quality of Oncology Nursing Care Scale (QONCS), and the Karen Scales demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α ranging from 0.79 to 0.95). Organizational factors, including leadership and staffing, and predictors such as burnout and work intensity, were found to influence perceived care quality. Important gaps remain regarding longitudinal use and integration of patient-reported outcome measures.

摘要

护理质量(QNC)是全球医疗保健系统中的一个核心概念,人们越来越重视开发可靠且适合具体情境的评估工具。近几十年来,已从基于结果的评估转向更全面、以患者为中心的框架,该框架同时考虑护理的临床指标和人际维度。本范围综述旨在梳理用于评估护理质量的自我报告工具的范围、性质和特征,包括其心理测量特性以及在不同临床环境中的具体应用。按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的方法和PRISMA-ScR指南,在CINAHL Complete、MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Scopus、Web of Science和ProQuest学位论文数据库以及灰色文献来源中进行了系统检索。如果研究报告了QNC评估工具在医院或社区护理环境中的开发、验证、改编或应用,并且以英文、葡萄牙文或西班牙文发表,则纳入研究。共纳入59项研究,时间跨度从1995年至2025年。所确定的工具主要围绕唐纳贝迪安的结构-过程-结果模型构建,许多工具强调诸如同理心、沟通和尊重等关系领域。像优质护理量表(GNCS)、肿瘤护理质量量表(QONCS)和卡伦量表等工具显示出很强的内部一致性(克朗巴赫α系数范围为0.79至0.95)。研究发现,包括领导能力和人员配备在内的组织因素以及诸如职业倦怠和工作强度等预测因素会影响感知到的护理质量。在患者报告结局测量的纵向使用和整合方面仍存在重大差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/171f/12472527/016564ae05fa/nursrep-15-00342-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验