• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大经椎间孔内镜下腰椎椎间孔切开术与传统技术的临床疗效比较

Clinical Efficacy of Extended Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy Compared with the Conventional Technique.

作者信息

Ahn Yong, Park Han-Byeol, Son Seong, Yoo Byung-Rhae

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon 21565, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 12;14(18):6446. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186446.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14186446
PMID:41010650
Abstract

: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is an emerging minimally invasive surgical technique for lumbar foraminal stenosis. However, its effectiveness is debated because of concerns regarding adequate decompression and its long-term consistency. This study introduced the extended form of TELF, an advanced technique, to provide more extensive decompression using the same approach. Thus, this study aimed to describe the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of this technique. : This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent conventional ( = 67) or extended ( = 64) TELF. The surgical procedure involved a transforaminal approach with endoscopic decompression, including the removal of the tip of the superior articular process, foraminal ligament, and ligamentum flavum (conventional group), or additional decompression, involving the isthmus and portions of the superior and inferior pedicle walls (extended group). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog pain scale, Oswestry disability index, and modified Macnab criteria. : Despite the longer surgical duration, the extended TELF group tended to show better outcomes in terms of the VAS and ODI scores at the early and final 2-year follow-ups ( < 0.05). The overall success rates were 92.19% and 85.07% in the extended and conventional groups, respectively. No difference was observed in surgical complications between the two groups. : Extended TELF, a refined endoscopic technique, achieves better effects than conventional TELF with a lower risk of nerve root irritation by creating a sufficiently safe resection margin. The results support the use of an extended TELF as an advanced form of endoscopic foraminal decompression.

摘要

经椎间孔内镜下腰椎椎间孔切开术(TELF)是一种用于治疗腰椎椎间孔狭窄的新兴微创手术技术。然而,由于对充分减压及其长期稳定性的担忧,其有效性存在争议。本研究引入了TELF的扩展形式,这是一种先进技术,旨在通过相同的方法提供更广泛的减压。因此,本研究旨在描述该技术的手术方法和临床结果。:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了接受传统TELF(n = 67)或扩展TELF(n = 64)的患者。手术过程采用经椎间孔入路并进行内镜减压,包括切除上关节突尖端、椎间孔韧带和黄韧带(传统组),或进行额外减压,包括峡部以及上下椎弓根壁的部分(扩展组)。使用视觉模拟疼痛量表、Oswestry功能障碍指数和改良Macnab标准评估临床结果。:尽管手术时间较长,但在早期和最终2年随访时,扩展TELF组在VAS和ODI评分方面往往表现出更好的结果(P < 0.05)。扩展组和传统组的总体成功率分别为92.19%和85.07%。两组在手术并发症方面未观察到差异。:扩展TELF是一种精细的内镜技术,通过创造足够安全的切除边缘,比传统TELF取得更好的效果,且神经根刺激风险更低。结果支持将扩展TELF作为内镜下椎间孔减压的一种先进形式。

相似文献

1
Clinical Efficacy of Extended Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy Compared with the Conventional Technique.扩大经椎间孔内镜下腰椎椎间孔切开术与传统技术的临床疗效比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 12;14(18):6446. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186446.
2
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
3
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy.内镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开术及椎间盘切除术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jun 25;15(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00003. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
4
Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Central and Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis: A Combined Uni-Portal and Bi-Portal Approach.经皮内镜减压治疗腰椎中央及侧隐窝椎管狭窄症:单通道与双通道联合入路
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jul 17;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00002. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
5
Shoulder Arthrogram肩关节造影
6
Impact of Extended Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy on Postoperative Surgical Outcomes: Is Greater Decompression Beneficial?扩大内镜下腰椎椎间孔切开术对术后手术效果的影响:更大程度的减压有益吗?
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Sep 2;19(4):418-425. doi: 10.14444/8784.
7
Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.单侧双孔椎间孔镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:98-99. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.064. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
8
Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Decompression with Modified Reaming Technique on Lateral Recess Stenosis: Outcomes of 155 Cases and Five Years' Experience. A Case Series Study.采用改良扩孔技术的全内镜经椎间孔减压术治疗侧隐窝狭窄:155例患者的疗效及五年经验。一项病例系列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jul;199:124073. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124073. Epub 2025 May 12.
9
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
10
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.

本文引用的文献

1
Transforaminal Full-Endoscopic Surgery for Lumbar Foraminal Pathologies: A Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Study.经椎间孔全内镜手术治疗腰椎椎间孔病变:一项比较临床疗效研究
Neurosurgery. 2025 Mar 1;96(3S):S51-S62. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003337. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Juxta-Fusional Foraminal Stenosis.经椎间孔内镜下腰椎椎间孔切开术治疗融合节段附近椎间孔狭窄
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 4;12(17):5745. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175745.
3
Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery.
独立斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)治疗既往腰椎后路融合术后的相邻节段疾病(ASD):临床和影像学结果及与后路翻修手术的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 20;12(8):2985. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082985.
4
Comparison of Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Non-Endoscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下椎间盘切除术与非内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Global Spine J. 2022 Jun;12(5):1012-1026. doi: 10.1177/21925682211020696. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Open Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术与开放显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Apr 15;46(8):538-549. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003843.
6
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Pain, Disability, and Complication Rate-A Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:疼痛、功能障碍及并发症发生率——一项随机临床试验
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 29;14(1):72-78. doi: 10.14444/7010. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Outcomes of endoscopic discectomy compared with open microdiscectomy and tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniations: a meta-analysis.内镜下椎间盘切除术与开放显微椎间盘切除术及管状显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Sep 6;31(6):802-815. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19532. Print 2019 Dec 1.
8
Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar discherniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与传统显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jul 5;13(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0868-0.
9
Meta-analysis of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs. fenestration discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与开窗髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的Meta分析
Orthopade. 2018 Jul;47(7):574-584. doi: 10.1007/s00132-018-3528-5.
10
A randomised controlled trial of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs microdiscectomy.经椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术的随机对照试验
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):847-856. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4885-6. Epub 2016 Nov 24.