• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《埃尔朗根工作团队凝聚力量表》的土耳其语改编、效度与信度研究:医疗专业人员中护理人员的团队凝聚力

Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability study of the "erlangen team cohesion at work scale": team cohesion of paramedics from healthcare professionals.

作者信息

Uysal Dilek, Altsoy Semra, Cinibulak Mehmet, Demirsoy Nilufer

机构信息

Eskisehir Osmangazi University Vocational School of Health Services, Eskisehir, Turkey.

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University Graduate Education Institute Health Management, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Sep 26;13(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03399-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-03399-0
PMID:41013713
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The healthcare sector is a labor-intensive service domain that operates on the basis of multidisciplinary collaboration. Effective service delivery in this field is not solely dependent on individual expertise, but also closely linked to the cooperation and cohesion established among team members. Team cohesion plays a critical role in various aspects, including patient safety, quality of care, team performance, and the prevention of medical errors. Particularly in healthcare services, where human life is directly at stake, the importance of team cohesion becomes even more evident in ensuring effective and safe care delivery. In this context, the present study aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Erlangen Team Cohesion at Work Scale and to assess the level of team cohesion among paramedics.

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted between June 15 and July 15, 2024, with 219 paramedics who are members of the Association of Paramedics and Prehospital Emergency Medicine. To validate the Turkish version of the Erlangen Team Cohesion at Work Scale, the following procedures were carried out: For content validity: cultural adaptation, linguistic and content validation, and a pilot study. For construct validity: Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). For reliability: Cronbach's alpha, item-total correlations, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability analyses.

RESULTS

The Turkish version of the scale, consisting of 12 items under a single factor, demonstrated excellent psychometric properties: Cronbach's alpha = 0.93; KMO = 0.94; explained variance = 59.76%. The fit indices from CFA were: χ²/df = 2.5, RMSEA = 0.08, SRMR = 0.04, GFI = 0.90, NFI = 0.93, RFI = 0.90, IFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.94, and CFI = 0.95. These findings confirmed that the Turkish version of the Erlangen Team Cohesion at Work Scale has high content and construct validity as well as strong reliability. Additionally, the paramedics who participated in the study were found to have a high level of team cohesion, with a mean score of 2.86 ± 0.63.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the Erlangen Team Cohesion at Work Scale demonstrated robust validity and reliability, supporting its applicability among healthcare professionals in Turkey. Furthermore, the high cohesion levels observed among paramedics highlight the presence of effective collaborative dynamics in prehospital emergency medical services.

摘要

背景

医疗保健部门是一个劳动密集型服务领域,基于多学科协作开展工作。该领域有效的服务提供不仅取决于个人专业知识,还与团队成员之间建立的合作与凝聚力密切相关。团队凝聚力在多个方面发挥着关键作用,包括患者安全、护理质量、团队绩效以及医疗差错的预防。特别是在医疗服务中,人的生命直接受到威胁,团队凝聚力在确保有效和安全的护理提供方面的重要性更加明显。在此背景下,本研究旨在验证工作场所埃尔朗根团队凝聚力量表的土耳其语版本,并评估护理人员的团队凝聚力水平。

方法

本方法学研究于2024年6月15日至7月15日进行,研究对象为219名护理人员,他们均为护理人员与院前急救医学协会的成员。为了验证工作场所埃尔朗根团队凝聚力量表的土耳其语版本,进行了以下程序:对于内容效度:文化适应、语言和内容验证以及预试验。对于结构效度:探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。对于信度:Cronbach's alpha、项目-总分相关性、分半信度和重测信度分析。

结果

该量表的土耳其语版本由单因素下的12个项目组成,显示出优异的心理测量学特性:Cronbach's alpha = 0.93;KMO = 0.94;解释方差 = 59.76%。CFA的拟合指数为:χ²/df = 2.5,RMSEA = 0.08,SRMR = 0.04,GFI = 0.90,NFI = 0.93,RFI = 0.90,IFI = 0.95,TLI = 0.94,CFI = 0.95。这些结果证实,工作场所埃尔朗根团队凝聚力量表的土耳其语版本具有较高的内容效度和结构效度以及较强的信度。此外,参与研究的护理人员被发现具有较高的团队凝聚力水平,平均得分为2.86 ± 0.63。

结论

工作场所埃尔朗根团队凝聚力量表的土耳其语版本显示出强大的效度和信度,支持其在土耳其医疗保健专业人员中的适用性。此外,护理人员中观察到的高凝聚力水平突出了院前急救医疗服务中有效协作动态的存在。

相似文献

1
Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability study of the "erlangen team cohesion at work scale": team cohesion of paramedics from healthcare professionals.《埃尔朗根工作团队凝聚力量表》的土耳其语改编、效度与信度研究:医疗专业人员中护理人员的团队凝聚力
BMC Psychol. 2025 Sep 26;13(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03399-0.
2
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
3
Turkish Reliability and Validity of the Intensive Care Unit Specific Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale (RAPS-ICU): A Tool Validation.重症监护病房特定压力性损伤风险评估量表(RAPS-ICU)的土耳其语信效度:一项工具验证
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Sep;30(5):e70176. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70176.
4
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
5
Adaptation of the ''Food Allergy Self-Efficacy Scale for Parents''(FASE-P) to Turkish: a validity and reliability study.父母食物过敏自我效能量表(FASE-P)土耳其语适应性研究:有效性和信度研究。
Turk J Pediatr. 2024 Nov 16;66(5):534-543. doi: 10.24953/turkjpediatr.2024.4691.
6
Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Mask Usability Scale: A Measure of the Perceived Usability of N95 Respirators Among Healthcare Students and Staff.口罩可用性量表的心理测量特性评估:一项针对医护专业学生和工作人员对N95口罩感知可用性的测量。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):4613-4626. doi: 10.1111/jan.16590. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
7
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the training needs assessment for critical care nurses.重症监护护士培训需求评估波斯语版本的心理测量学特性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):1149. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07657-y.
8
Adaptation of the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teen Scale into Turkish and examination of its psychometric properties: a validity and reliability study.将青少年糖尿病问题领域量表改编为土耳其语并检验其心理测量学特性:一项有效性和信度研究。
Turk J Pediatr. 2024 Nov 16;66(5):588-598. doi: 10.24953/turkjpediatr.2024.4535.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Trauma Resiliency Scale (tRS-18).创伤弹性量表(tRS-18)中文版的跨文化调适与验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06166-4.
10
The medical student stressor questionnaire (MSSQ): validation and reliability in Turkish students.医学生应激源问卷(MSSQ):土耳其学生中的效度与信度
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):1141. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07689-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring team cohesion: the Erlangen Team Cohesion at Work Scale (ETC).开发和验证了一种用于测量团队凝聚力的问卷:埃尔朗根工作团队凝聚力量表(ETC)。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 22;12(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01583-2.
2
Correlation between the quality of nursing handover, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among psychiatric nurses.精神科护士护理交接班质量、工作满意度与团队凝聚力之间的相关性
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 11;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00864-8.
3
Paramedic Disaster Health Management Competencies: A Scoping Review.
急救灾难卫生管理能力:范围综述。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Jun;34(3):322-329. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004357. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
5
Fundamentals of estimating sample size.样本量估计的基本原理。
Nurse Res. 2016 May;23(5):21-5. doi: 10.7748/nr.23.5.21.s5.
6
Measuring team cohesion: observations from the science.衡量团队凝聚力:来自科学领域的观察
Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):365-74. doi: 10.1177/0018720815578267.
7
Insomnia, excessive sleepiness, excessive fatigue, anxiety, depression and shift work disorder in nurses having less than 11 hours in-between shifts.轮班护士的失眠、过度嗜睡、过度疲劳、焦虑、抑郁和轮班工作障碍,轮班之间的时间少于 11 小时。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e70882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070882. eCollection 2013.
8
Understanding sample size determination in nursing research.理解护理研究中的样本量确定
West J Nurs Res. 2013 Aug;35(7):943-56. doi: 10.1177/0193945913482052. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
9
Teamwork: a concept analysis.团队合作:一项概念分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jan;61(2):232-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04496.x.
10
Effective teamwork in healthcare: research and reality.医疗保健中的有效团队合作:研究与现实。
Healthc Pap. 2007;7 Spec No:26-34. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.18669.