• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型骨盆前环损伤固定钢板的设计:数字解剖学研究与有限元分析

Design of novel plate for fixation of anterior pelvic ring injury: a digital anatomy study and finite element analysis.

作者信息

Yu Kequan, Gao Shichang, Wu Min

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, District of Chongqing City, The Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Yubei, Yubei District, Chongqing, 401120, China.

Department of Radiology, The People's Hospital of Yubei District of Chongqing City, Chongqing, 401120, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Sep 26;20(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06280-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-06280-3
PMID:41013765
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a novel internal fixation system for anterior pelvic ring injuries and to compare the biomechanical stability of this novel anatomical plate with conventional fixation devices in the management of Tile B1-type pelvic fractures using finite element analysis.

METHODS

A total of 200 pelvic thin-slice CT datasets were collected from healthy adults, comprising 100 male and 100 female subjects. The three-dimensional (3D) pelvic models were reconstructed using Mimics software. The following measurements were obtained: inter-pubic tubercle distance (ITD), inter-obturator foramen inner border distance (IOFIBD), superior-inferior distance of pubic symphysis (SIDPS), pubis superior ramus length from mid-external pubic tubercle to lateral obturator margin (PSR-LOTM), pubic symphysis gap (PSG), pubic symphysis upper plane-superior ramus angle (SPS-SRA), pubic symphysis-coronal plane angle (PS-CPA), maximum superior-inferior diameter of pubic superior ramus (SID-PSR), and anterior-posterior diameter of pubic superior ramus (APD-PSR). Standard pelvis models were selected and imported into SolidWorks software to design two novel plates. Finally, a Tile B1 pelvic finite element model was established and fixed using two novel plates, a single superior pubic symphysis plate, and a combination of anterior and superior pubic symphysis plates. A load of 500 N was applied to the model in three directions (cranial-caudal, anterior-posterior, and lateral-medial), and the stiffness was determined based on the maximum displacements.

RESULTS

The ITD was 48.93 ± 5.51 mm in males and 54.45 ± 5.15 mm in females; the IOFIBD was 46.67 ± 4.02 mm in males and 55.17 ± 4.46 mm in females; the SIDPS was 39.77 ± 4.12 mm in males and 36.76 ± 4.21 mm in females; the PSR-LOTM was 35.87 ± 4.04 mm in males and 37.62 ± 5.31 mm in females; the SPS-SRA was 135.67 ± 4.83° in males and 137.53 ± 4.46° in females; and the ITD + PSR-LOTM was 120.68 ± 10.66 mm in males and 124.70 ± 11.93 mm in females. Significant differences were observed between males and females for all these measurements (P < 0.05). These values were used as reference criteria for selecting standard pelvis models. The ITD + PSR-LOTM data were sorted in ascending order, and the medians of the 0-33%, 33-66%, and 66-100% intervals were used as references for selecting standard pelvis models. Based on the selected standard pelvis models, two designs and six length specifications (110, 115, 120, 125, 130, and 135 mm) of anatomical plates were developed. In the finite element analysis, the maximum displacements of the pelvis under three loading modes (cranial-caudal, anterior-posterior, and lateral-medial) were as follows: for Type A plate fixation, 0.357 mm, 0.192 mm, and 1.018 mm, respectively; for Type B plate fixation, 0.362 mm, 0.505 mm, and 1.133 mm, respectively; for single pubic symphysis superior plate fixation, 0.386 mm, 0.965 mm, and 1.232 mm, respectively; and for combined pubic symphysis anterior and superior plate fixation, 0.378 mm, 0.874 mm, and 1.151 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed two types of plates and designed different specifications to meet clinical needs. Preliminary biomechanical finite element analysis indicated promising fixation stability for Tile B1 type injuries, warranting further clinical investigation.

摘要

目的

开发一种用于骨盆前环损伤的新型内固定系统,并通过有限元分析比较这种新型解剖钢板与传统固定装置在治疗Tile B1型骨盆骨折时的生物力学稳定性。

方法

从健康成年人中收集了200份骨盆薄层CT数据集,包括100名男性和100名女性受试者。使用Mimics软件重建三维(3D)骨盆模型。获得以下测量值:耻骨结节间距离(ITD)、闭孔内缘间距离(IOFIBD)、耻骨联合上下距离(SIDPS)、耻骨上支从中部耻骨结节至闭孔外侧缘的长度(PSR-LOTM)、耻骨联合间隙(PSG)、耻骨联合上平面与耻骨上支夹角(SPS-SRA)、耻骨联合与冠状面夹角(PS-CPA)、耻骨上支最大上下径(SID-PSR)以及耻骨上支前后径(APD-PSR)。选择标准骨盆模型并导入SolidWorks软件以设计两种新型钢板。最后,建立Tile B1骨盆有限元模型,并使用两种新型钢板、单个耻骨联合上钢板以及耻骨联合前上钢板组合进行固定。在三个方向(头-尾、前-后和外侧-内侧)对模型施加500 N的载荷,并根据最大位移确定刚度。

结果

男性的ITD为48.93±5.51 mm,女性为54.45±5.15 mm;男性的IOFIBD为46.67±4.02 mm,女性为55.17±4.46 mm;男性的SIDPS为39.77±4.12 mm,女性为36.76±4.21 mm;男性的PSR-LOTM为35.87±4.04 mm,女性为37.62±5.31 mm;男性的SPS-SRA为135.67±4.83°,女性为137.53±4.46°;男性的ITD + PSR-LOTM为120.68±10.66 mm,女性为124.70±11.93 mm。所有这些测量值在男性和女性之间均观察到显著差异(P < 0.05)。这些值用作选择标准骨盆模型的参考标准。将ITD + PSR-LOTM数据按升序排序,并将0-33%、33-66%和66-100%区间的中位数用作选择标准骨盆模型的参考。基于所选的标准骨盆模型,开发了两种设计和六种长度规格(分别为110、115、120、125、130和135 mm)的解剖钢板。在有限元分析中,骨盆在三种加载模式(头-尾、前-后和外侧-内侧)下的最大位移如下:A型钢板固定分别为0.357 mm、0.192 mm和1.018 mm;B型钢板固定分别为0.362 mm、0.505 mm和1.133 mm;单个耻骨联合上钢板固定分别为0.386 mm、0.965 mm和1.232 mm;耻骨联合前上钢板组合固定分别为0.378 mm、0.874 mm和1.151 mm。

结论

我们成功开发了两种类型的钢板并设计了不同规格以满足临床需求。初步生物力学有限元分析表明,Tile B1型损伤的固定稳定性良好,值得进一步临床研究。

相似文献

1
Design of novel plate for fixation of anterior pelvic ring injury: a digital anatomy study and finite element analysis.新型骨盆前环损伤固定钢板的设计:数字解剖学研究与有限元分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Sep 26;20(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06280-3.
2
Comparison of ESIN and other minimally invasive techniques for anterior pelvic ring injury: a finite element analysis and case-control study.前骨盆环损伤的 ESIN 与其他微创技术的比较:有限元分析和病例对照研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2636-2648. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001137.
3
Antegrade insertion of full-length ramus screws for the treatment of pelvic and/or acetabular fracture.
Injury. 2025 Oct;56(10):112669. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112669. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
4
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
5
Clinical efficacy and biomechanical analysis of robotic internal fixation with percutaneous screws in the treatment of both-column acetabular fractures.经皮螺钉机器人内固定治疗双柱髋臼骨折的临床疗效及生物力学分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06168-6.
6
[Comparative study on implantation safety and stability of S and S sacral alar-iliac screws for sacroiliac joint fixation].S型和S型骶骨翼-髂骨螺钉用于骶髂关节固定的植入安全性和稳定性的比较研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 15;39(6):723-728. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202503041.
7
A comparative finite element study of novel design hook plates for fixation of patella fracture.用于髌骨骨折固定的新型设计钩钢板的比较有限元研究
Injury. 2025 Aug;56(8):112567. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112567. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
8
Fluoroscopy-assisted identification of the individual optimal antegrade entry point of the anterior column fixation corridor in pelvic and acetabular surgery: a novel perspective.透视辅助下确定骨盆及髋臼手术中前柱固定通道的个体化最佳顺行入点:一种新视角
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 9;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06027-0.
9
Does spinopelvic alignment affect fixation stability in pelvic ring fractures?: A finite element study.脊柱骨盆对线是否会影响骨盆环骨折的固定稳定性?:一项有限元研究。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2025 Aug;128:106622. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106622. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
10
Comparison of Biomechanical Characteristics and Pelvic Ring Stability Using Different Fixation Methods to Treat Pubic Symphysis Diastasis: A Finite Element Study.使用不同固定方法治疗耻骨联合分离的生物力学特性及骨盆环稳定性比较:一项有限元研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(49):e2207. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002207.

本文引用的文献

1
[Research progress of pubic symphysis diastasis].[耻骨联合分离的研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 15;37(12):1541-1547. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202306093.
2
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates.不同骨条件和骨整合率下短种植体应力分布的三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9.
3
Effects of Sex, Age and Height on Symphysis-Ischial Spine Distance Measured on a Pelvic CT.
性别、年龄和身高对骨盆CT测量的耻骨联合-坐骨棘距离的影响。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 24;11(9):2395. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092395.
4
Effect of crown-to-implant ratio and crown height space on marginal bone stress: a finite element analysis.冠-种植体比例和冠高度空间对边缘骨应力的影响:有限元分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Sep 1;7(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00368-1.
5
Anterior supra-acetabular external fixation for tile C1 pelvic fractures: a digital anatomical study and a finite element analysis.髋臼上前方外固定治疗Tile C1型骨盆骨折:数字解剖学研究与有限元分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1679-1686. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01517-8. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
6
Biomechanical comparison of three minimally invasive fixations for unilateral pubic rami fractures.三种用于单侧耻骨支骨折的微创固定方法的生物力学比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Sep 4;21(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03604-8.
7
A novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation: A finite element analysis.一种新型经皮交叉螺钉固定治疗Day II型新月形骨折脱位:有限元分析
J Orthop Translat. 2019 Sep 5;20:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.08.002. eCollection 2020 Jan.
8
Biomechanical Comparison of Three Internal Fixation Techniques for Stabilizing Posterior Pelvic Ring Disruption: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.三种内固定技术稳定骨盆后环破裂的生物力学比较:三维有限元分析。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Apr;11(2):195-203. doi: 10.1111/os.12431. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Anterior subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) versus plate fixation for pelvic anterior ring fracture.前路皮下内固定器(INFIX)与钢板固定治疗骨盆前环骨折。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 22;9(1):2578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39068-7.
10
Finite Element Analysis of Different Double-Plate Angles in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion with No Cortical Support opposite the Primary Lateral Plate.无皮质支撑对侧主外侧板治疗股骨干骨不连的不同双钢板角度的有限元分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 31;2018:3267107. doi: 10.1155/2018/3267107. eCollection 2018.