Suppr超能文献

谐波复合音在传感器和源水平的前注意音高处理:比较同步记录的脑电图和脑磁图数据

Pre-attentive Pitch Processing of Harmonic Complex Sounds at Sensor and Source Levels: Comparing Simultaneously Recorded EEG and MEG Data.

作者信息

Inbar Talya C, Badier Jean-Michel, Bénar Christian, Kanzari Khoubeib, Besson Mireille, Chanoine Valérie

机构信息

Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.

Institute for Language and Communication in the Brain, Aix-en-Provence, France.

出版信息

Brain Topogr. 2025 Sep 27;38(6):71. doi: 10.1007/s10548-025-01147-6.

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), two of the most widely used tools for studying human brain dynamics, are thought to have varying spatial resolutions. Here, we simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG data from 14 participants to directly compare their sensitivities - at both the sensor and source levels - to the auditory Mismatch Negativity (MMN in EEG and MMNm in MEG) elicited by pitch deviants. At the sensor level, we observed that negative components emerged in early (100-190 ms) and late (260-420 ms) latency windows. These responses displayed a fronto-central distribution in EEG and a centro-parietal distribution in MEG. MEG also yielded larger effect sizes than EEG, likely reflecting differences in signal-to-noise ratio between MEG and EEG. At the source level, our findings support the involvement of a fronto-temporal auditory MMN network. Both EEG and MEG identified generators in the superior temporal gyrus, Heschl's gyrus, interior frontal gyrus, and insular regions. Notably, EEG source localization revealed additional generators in the left superior temporal sulcus not detected by MEG, whereas MEG identified late components generators in the right hemisphere that were not observed with EEG. Taken together, these results suggest that EEG and MEG may provide complementary perspectives on auditory processing. However, given the inherent complexity of comparing data acquired with different methodologies and the limited sample size, our conclusions should be regarded as preliminary.

摘要

脑电图(EEG)和脑磁图(MEG)是研究人类大脑动态最广泛使用的两种工具,人们认为它们具有不同的空间分辨率。在这里,我们同时记录了14名参与者的EEG和MEG数据,以直接比较它们在传感器和源水平上对音高偏差引起的听觉失配负波(EEG中的MMN和MEG中的MMNm)的敏感性。在传感器水平上,我们观察到负成分出现在早期(100 - 190毫秒)和晚期(260 - 420毫秒)潜伏期窗口。这些反应在EEG中表现为额中央分布,在MEG中表现为中央顶叶分布。MEG的效应大小也比EEG大,这可能反映了MEG和EEG之间信噪比的差异。在源水平上,我们的研究结果支持额颞听觉MMN网络的参与。EEG和MEG都在颞上回、颞横回、额内侧回和岛叶区域识别出了发生器。值得注意的是,EEG源定位揭示了MEG未检测到的左颞上沟中的额外发生器,而MEG识别出了EEG未观察到的右半球晚期成分发生器。综上所述,这些结果表明EEG和MEG可能为听觉处理提供互补的视角。然而,鉴于比较用不同方法获取的数据的内在复杂性以及样本量有限,我们的结论应被视为初步的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验