Deutsch Julia, Finch Natalie, Kästner Sabine, Hibbert Angie
The Feline Centre, Langford Vets, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
J Feline Med Surg. 2025 Sep;27(9):1098612X251364368. doi: 10.1177/1098612X251364368. Epub 2025 Sep 28.
ObjectivesThe sedation quality of intramuscular (IM) alfaxalone and butorphanol in combination with midazolam was investigated in hyperthyroid cats undergoing suitability assessment for radioiodine treatment.MethodsA total of 60 hyperthyroid cats undergoing diagnostic investigations were randomly allocated to receive butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg IM) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg IM) with either alfaxalone (2 mg/kg IM) (BMA2) or alfaxalone (3 mg/kg IM) (BMA3), or butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg IM) with alfaxalone (3 mg/kg IM) (BA3). If required, additional alfaxalone (0.2 mg/kg) was administered intravenously. Cat Stress Score, response to injection, time to lateral recumbency, sedation score at 10, 15 and 20 mins and subsequent 10-min intervals, additional alfaxalone requirements, and time to first administration, recovery quality (excellent, fair, poor) and adverse effects were assessed. Thyroxine concentrations, gabapentin treatment and assessors were recorded. Heart and respiratory rate and arterial haemoglobin saturation were monitored every 5 mins. Data were compared using χ and Kruskal-Wallis testing. The multidimensional sedation score and predictors of sedation score were analysed using a mixed effect and linear regression model, respectively ( <0.05).ResultsNo significant predictors for sedation quality were identified. In all groups, the median sedation score was considered good and the median recovery score was fair. The sedation score over time across groups and cardiorespiratory variables were not significantly different. Additional alfaxalone was administered in 53 cats. In group BA3, additional alfaxalone was required significantly earlier ( = 0.043). Although sedated, muscle twitching was a commonly observed adverse effect in all groups, but head pawing was significantly increased in BA3 ( = 0.014).Conclusions and relevanceSedation and recovery quality were satisfactory with all protocols but the addition of midazolam prolonged sedation.
目的
研究在接受放射性碘治疗适宜性评估的甲状腺功能亢进猫中,肌肉注射(IM)阿法沙龙与布托啡诺联合咪达唑仑的镇静质量。
方法
总共60只接受诊断性检查的甲状腺功能亢进猫被随机分配,接受布托啡诺(0.3 mg/kg IM)和咪达唑仑(0.2 mg/kg IM),同时注射阿法沙龙(2 mg/kg IM)(BMA2)或阿法沙龙(3 mg/kg IM)(BMA3),或者布托啡诺(0.3 mg/kg IM)与阿法沙龙(3 mg/kg IM)(BA3)。如有需要,静脉注射额外的阿法沙龙(0.2 mg/kg)。评估猫应激评分、对注射的反应、侧卧时间、10、15和20分钟以及随后每10分钟间隔的镇静评分、额外阿法沙龙的需求量、首次给药时间、恢复质量(优秀、一般、差)和不良反应。记录甲状腺素浓度、加巴喷丁治疗情况和评估者。每5分钟监测心率、呼吸频率和动脉血红蛋白饱和度。使用χ检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较数据。分别使用混合效应模型和线性回归模型分析多维镇静评分和镇静评分的预测因素(P<0.05)。
结果
未发现镇静质量的显著预测因素。在所有组中,镇静评分中位数被认为良好,恢复评分中位数为一般。各组间随时间变化的镇静评分和心肺变量无显著差异。53只猫接受了额外的阿法沙龙。在BA3组中,需要额外阿法沙龙的时间显著更早(P = 0.043)。虽然处于镇静状态,但肌肉抽搐在所有组中都是常见的不良反应,但BA3组中用头抓挠的情况显著增加(P = 0.014)。
结论及相关性
所有方案的镇静和恢复质量均令人满意,但添加咪达唑仑会延长镇静时间。