• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单耳和双耳条件下对短声和线性调频连续正波刺激的听觉脑干反应的潜伏期特征

Latency Characteristics of Auditory Brainstem Responses to Click and LS CE-Chirp Stimuli Under Monaural and Binaural Conditions.

作者信息

Lee Sungmin

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Aural Rehabilitation, Tongmyong University, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

J Audiol Otol. 2025 Oct;29(4):258-264. doi: 10.7874/jao.2025.00220. Epub 2025 Oct 20.

DOI:10.7874/jao.2025.00220
PMID:41178477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12580943/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) represents a critical tool for evaluating auditory pathways. Although absolute and inter-peak latencies (IPLs) are commonly analyzed, the differences between different stimulus types and presentation modes, particularly during binaural processing, remain underexplored. This study compared the absolute latencies, IPLs, and binaural interaction component (BIC) latencies of ABRs elicited by click and LS CE-chirp stimuli under both monaural and binaural conditions. The present study analyzed the clinical features of cochlear function in Ramsay-Hunt syndrome.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one adults with normal hearing aged 22-25 years underwent ABR testing using click and LS CE-chirp stimuli under binaural, right ear, and left ear conditions. Their absolute latencies, IPLs, and BIC latencies for waves I, III, and V were recorded. BIC latencies were calculated by subtracting each subject's binaural wave latency from their mean monaural latency.

RESULTS

The subjects' LS CE-chirp stimuli elicited significantly longer wave V latencies under binaural vs monaural conditions, although their click-evoked ABRs did not show significant differences across the different presentation modes evaluated. The wave III latencies were significantly longer for the LS CE-chirp stimuli under the binaural and right-ear conditions. The IPLs showed stimulus- and ear-dependent differences, with LS CE-chirps evoking shorter IPLs vs. regular clicks under some conditions. The BIC latencies for waves III and V were significantly longer for the LS CE-chirp stimuli, whereas those for wave I showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

LS CE-chirp stimuli enhanced ABR detectability and revealed longer binaural processing times, particularly at higher auditory brainstem levels. These findings support the utility of LS CE-chirp in terms of assessing binaural integration and central auditory processing.

摘要

背景与目的

听性脑干反应(ABR)是评估听觉通路的重要工具。虽然绝对潜伏期和峰间潜伏期(IPL)常被分析,但不同刺激类型和呈现模式之间的差异,尤其是在双耳处理过程中,仍未得到充分研究。本研究比较了单耳和双耳条件下短声和低刺激率CE-啁啾刺激诱发的ABR的绝对潜伏期、IPL和双耳相互作用成分(BIC)潜伏期。本研究分析了拉姆齐-亨特综合征患者耳蜗功能的临床特征。

对象与方法

21名年龄在22 - 25岁的听力正常的成年人在双耳、右耳和左耳条件下使用短声和低刺激率CE-啁啾刺激进行ABR测试。记录他们I、III和V波的绝对潜伏期、IPL和BIC潜伏期。BIC潜伏期通过从每个受试者的单耳平均潜伏期减去其双耳波潜伏期来计算。

结果

尽管在评估的不同呈现模式下,短声诱发的ABR没有显著差异,但受试者的低刺激率CE-啁啾刺激在双耳条件下诱发的V波潜伏期明显长于单耳条件。在双耳和右耳条件下,低刺激率CE-啁啾刺激的III波潜伏期明显更长。IPL表现出刺激和耳依赖性差异,在某些条件下,低刺激率CE-啁啾刺激诱发的IPL比常规短声更短。低刺激率CE-啁啾刺激的III波和V波的BIC潜伏期明显更长,而I波的BIC潜伏期没有显著差异。

结论

低刺激率CE-啁啾刺激增强了ABR的可检测性,并显示出更长的双耳处理时间,尤其是在较高的听觉脑干水平。这些发现支持了低刺激率CE-啁啾在评估双耳整合和中枢听觉处理方面的实用性。

相似文献

1
Latency Characteristics of Auditory Brainstem Responses to Click and LS CE-Chirp Stimuli Under Monaural and Binaural Conditions.单耳和双耳条件下对短声和线性调频连续正波刺激的听觉脑干反应的潜伏期特征
J Audiol Otol. 2025 Oct;29(4):258-264. doi: 10.7874/jao.2025.00220. Epub 2025 Oct 20.
2
Which stimulus should be used for auditory brainstem response in newborns; CE-Chirp® level specific versus Click stimulus.新生儿听觉脑干反应应该使用哪种刺激;CE-Chirp® 特定水平与 Click 刺激。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jul;170:111597. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111597. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Auditory brainstem responses to level-specific chirps in normal-hearing adults.听力正常成年人对特定强度啁啾声的听觉脑干反应。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Oct;23(9):712-21. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.9.5.
4
Supra-Threshold LS CE-Chirp Auditory Brainstem Response in the Elderly.老年人阈上 LS CE-Chirp 听觉脑干反应。
Audiol Neurootol. 2024;29(4):253-262. doi: 10.1159/000533683. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
5
Auditory brainstem response with click and CE-Chirp® Level Specific stimuli in hearing infants.听性脑干反应联合短声和 CE-Chirp® 频率特异性刺激在婴幼儿听力测试中的应用。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Aug;147:110819. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110819. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
6
Investigating the optimal stimulus to evoke the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response.研究最佳刺激以引出听觉脑干反应的双耳相互作用成分。
Hear Res. 2023 Dec;440:108896. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108896. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
7
Comparison of LS CE-Chirp and Click Stimuli in Auditory Brainstem Responses in High-Frequency Hearing Loss.高频听力损失患者听觉脑干反应中LS CE-线性调频脉冲和滴答声刺激的比较
Ear Hear. 2025;46(2):347-352. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001586. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
8
Influence of Stimulus Polarity on the Auditory Brainstem Response From Level-Specific Chirp.刺激极性对特定强度线性调频声诱发的听觉脑干反应的影响
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Oct;25(4):199-208. doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00248. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
9
Investigating the Effects of Level-Specific CE-Chirp on Auditory Brainstem Response Waves in Normal Hearing Infants.研究特定水平CE-线性调频脉冲对正常听力婴儿听觉脑干反应波的影响。
Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;31(2):62-71. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.2.7. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
10
Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.作为双耳时间差函数的人类听觉脑干反应双耳相互作用成分的规范性研究。
Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):629-643. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000964.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Amplitudes of Binaural Interaction Components Elicited by Diverse Stimuli and Their Relationships With Behavioral Measures in Individuals With Normal Hearing.探索正常听力个体中由不同刺激引发的双耳相互作用成分的幅度及其与行为测量指标的关系。
J Audiol Otol. 2025 Apr;29(2):117-125. doi: 10.7874/jao.2024.00612. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
Binaural interaction in human auditory brainstem and middle-latency responses affected by sound frequency band, lateralization predictability, and attended modality.人听觉脑干中的双耳相互作用以及受声音频带、侧化可预测性和注意模态影响的中潜伏期反应。
Hear Res. 2024 Oct;452:109089. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109089. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
3
Influence of Stimulus Polarity on the Auditory Brainstem Response From Level-Specific Chirp.刺激极性对特定强度线性调频声诱发的听觉脑干反应的影响
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Oct;25(4):199-208. doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00248. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.作为双耳时间差函数的人类听觉脑干反应双耳相互作用成分的规范性研究。
Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):629-643. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000964.
5
Evidence for the origin of the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response.听觉脑干反应双耳交互成分起源的证据。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Jan;51(2):598-610. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14571. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
6
Age-Related Maturation of Wave V Latency of Auditory Brainstem Response in Children.儿童听觉脑干反应中波V潜伏期的年龄相关成熟度
J Audiol Otol. 2016 Sep;20(2):97-101. doi: 10.7874/jao.2016.20.2.97. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.听觉脑干反应双耳交互成分的生理基础及临床应用
Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):e276-e290. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000301.
8
Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.听觉脑干反应中的双耳相互作用:一项规范性研究。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr;126(4):772-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.07.032. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
9
Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.新生儿啁啾听性脑干反应的波形、潜伏期和波幅值评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;78(4):631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
10
Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.正常听力受试者中基于导出频段潜伏期设计的啁啾刺激的听觉脑干反应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Nov;124(5):3022-37. doi: 10.1121/1.2990709.