Suppr超能文献

计划性剖宫产术后臀位与头位新生儿的差异:一项系统评价

Differences between breech and cephalic neonates born after planned cesarean section: a systematic review.

作者信息

Du Yi, Zhang Xiaoyun, Zhou Xinyu, Baker Philip N, Kilby Mark D, Tong Chao

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

State Key Laboratory of Maternal and Fetal Medicine of Chongqing Municipality, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Nov 7;25(1):1170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08327-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing number of studies have found that breech presentation is related to preexisting diseases and may affect future fetal development. This study aimed to compare the differences between breech presentation and cephalic presentation and explore the underlying mechanisms of adverse outcomes caused by fetal station itself.

METHODS

‘PubMed’, ‘Embase’ and ‘Cochrane Library’ were searched from inception to October 21, 2022. Comparative studies containing ‘prelabor CS’ or ‘elective CS’ of cephalic and breech presentation were included. A total of 585 studies were included, and 5 studies were eligible for final research. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used for data synthesis.

RESULTS

The mortality of breech group is not different from that of cephalic group (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.09–5.13,  = 0.71). No differences in infant (< 1 year) and neonatal (0–27 days) mortality were found between the breech and cephalic presentations (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.86–2.82,  = 0.14). However, breech group was found to have lower birth weight ( < 0.002), umbilical coiling index( < 0.0001), and bone SOS ( = 0.03 )than cephalic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The breech presentation itself may not be related to adverse pregnancy outcomes, and more attention is needed for further exploration.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

[Image: see text]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-025-08327-z.

摘要

背景

越来越多的研究发现臀位与既往疾病有关,可能影响未来胎儿发育。本研究旨在比较臀位和头位之间的差异,并探讨胎儿先露本身导致不良结局的潜在机制。

方法

检索“PubMed”“Embase”和“Cochrane图书馆”自建库至2022年10月21日的文献。纳入包含头位和臀位的“临产前剖宫产”或“选择性剖宫产”的比较研究。共纳入585项研究,5项研究符合最终研究标准。使用Review Manager 5.4.1进行数据合成。

结果

臀位组的死亡率与头位组无差异(RR 0.69,95%CI 0.09-5.13,P = 0.71)。臀位和头位之间在婴儿(<1岁)和新生儿(0-27天)死亡率方面未发现差异(RR 1.56,95%CI 0.86-2.82,P = 0.14)。然而,发现臀位组的出生体重(P < 0.002)、脐绕指数(P < 0.0001)和骨声速(P = 0.03)低于头位组。

结论

臀位本身可能与不良妊娠结局无关,需要进一步探索以引起更多关注。

图形摘要

[图片:见正文]

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12884-025-08327-z获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2361/12595814/9d0eb85822df/12884_2025_8327_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

4
External cephalic version for breech presentation before term.足月前臀位的外倒转术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 29;2015(7):CD000084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000084.pub3.
5
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery.足月臀位分娩计划剖宫产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 21;2015(7):CD000166. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000166.pub2.
8
External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.足月臀位的外倒转术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 1;2015(4):CD000083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub3.

本文引用的文献

9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验