Prior R B, Fass R J
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):184-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.2.184.
The in vitro activities of ticarcillin (T) and carbenicillin (C) against 253 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (108 randomly selected clinical isolates and 145 isolates determined to be C resistant by 10 referring hospitals) were evaluated using both broth microdilution and disk diffusion techniques. T activity was usually twofold or greater than C activity for individual strains in both sample populations. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of T and C were </=0.4 to >400 (median, 25) and 0.8 to >400 (median, 50) mug/ml, respectively, for the random sample and 1.6 to >400 (median, 50) and 12.5 to >400 (median, 200) mug/ml, respectively, for the select sample. For predicting susceptibility (MIC, </=50 mug of T and </=100 mug of C per ml), 75-mug T and 100-mug C disks were equivalent in accuracy for the random sample (T/T = 92.6%, T/C = 92.0%, C/T = 91.7%, C/C = 89.8%). Regression-line analyses of zones of inhibition versus MIC values for the four combinations showed coefficients of correlation to be -0.81, -0.76, -0.77, and -0.75, respectively. With the sample selected as being resistant to C, T was better than C for predicting T susceptibility (P < 0.05), and T was equivalent to C for predicting C susceptibility (T/T = 84.3%, T/C = 81.0%, C/T = 73.6%, C/C = 80.4%). Coefficients of correlation were -0.70, -0.74, -0.55, and -0.61, respectively. T and C disks were, therefore, equivalent for determining T and C susceptibilities, but the T disk was more reliable for determining T susceptibility in a population skewed with C-resistant strains.
采用肉汤微量稀释法和纸片扩散法,对替卡西林(T)和羧苄西林(C)针对253株铜绿假单胞菌(108株随机选取的临床分离株以及由10家转诊医院确定对羧苄西林耐药的145株分离株)的体外活性进行了评估。在两个样本群体中,对于各个菌株而言,替卡西林的活性通常比羧苄西林高两倍或更高。对于随机样本,替卡西林和羧苄西林的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值分别为≤0.4至>400(中位数为25)μg/ml和0.8至>400(中位数为50)μg/ml;对于选定样本,分别为1.6至>400(中位数为50)μg/ml和12.5至>400(中位数为200)μg/ml。对于预测敏感性(MIC,每毫升≤50μg的替卡西林和≤100μg的羧苄西林),75μg的替卡西林纸片和100μg的羧苄西林纸片在随机样本中的准确性相当(替卡西林/替卡西林 = 92.6%,替卡西林/羧苄西林 = 92.0%,羧苄西林/替卡西林 = 91.7%,羧苄西林/羧苄西林 = 89.8%)。对四种组合的抑菌圈与MIC值进行回归线分析,相关系数分别为 -0.81、-0.76、-0.77和 -0.75。对于选定为对羧苄西林耐药的样本,在预测替卡西林敏感性方面,替卡西林优于羧苄西林(P<0.05),在预测羧苄西林敏感性方面,替卡西林与羧苄西林相当(替卡西林/替卡西林 = 84.3%,替卡西林/羧苄西林 = 81.0%,羧苄西林/替卡西林 = 73.6%,羧苄西林/羧苄西林 = 80.4%)。相关系数分别为 -0.70、-0.74、-0.55和 -0.61。因此,替卡西林和羧苄西林纸片在确定替卡西林和羧苄西林敏感性方面相当,但在一个以对羧苄西林耐药菌株为主的群体中,替卡西林纸片在确定替卡西林敏感性方面更可靠。