• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义性失读症

Semantic access dyslexia.

作者信息

Warrington E K, Shallice T

出版信息

Brain. 1979 Mar;102(1):43-63. doi: 10.1093/brain/102.1.43.

DOI:10.1093/brain/102.1.43
PMID:427532
Abstract

An analytical investigation of the residual reading capacities of a single patient with dyslexia without dysgraphia is reported. Both his ability to name and to comprehend letters and words were severely impaired. The major finding of this investigation was AR's striking capacity for categorizing words he could not read. In addition there was evidence of semantic priming effects. Thus AR was frequently able to achieve partial comprehension of words he could not read. The orthodox interpretation of the dyslexia without dysgraphia in terms of a disconnection syndrome is shown to be inappropriate, at least for the present case, where the deficit appears to be within the semantic domain; it is argued that this type of dyslexia is due to an impairment in accessing semantic information.

摘要

本文报告了对一名患有单纯性阅读障碍(无书写障碍)患者残余阅读能力的分析研究。他对字母和单词的命名及理解能力均严重受损。该研究的主要发现是,AR对他无法读出的单词进行分类的能力惊人。此外,有证据表明存在语义启动效应。因此,AR常常能够对他无法读出的单词实现部分理解。结果表明,至少就目前这个缺陷似乎存在于语义领域的病例而言,用脱节综合征来正统解释单纯性阅读障碍是不合适的;有人认为,这种类型的阅读障碍是由于获取语义信息的能力受损所致。

相似文献

1
Semantic access dyslexia.语义性失读症
Brain. 1979 Mar;102(1):43-63. doi: 10.1093/brain/102.1.43.
2
Concrete word dyslexia.具体性词汇阅读障碍
Br J Psychol. 1981 May;72(Pt 2):175-96. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1981.tb02175.x.
3
Modality specific word comprehension deficits in deep dyslexia.深度诵读困难中特定模态的词汇理解缺陷。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980 Oct;43(10):866-72. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.43.10.866.
4
Developmental and acquired dyslexias.发育性和获得性阅读障碍。
Cortex. 2006 Aug;42(6):898-910. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70434-9.
5
Semantic memory and reading abilities: a case report.语义记忆与阅读能力:一例报告
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995 Jan;1(1):104-10. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700000163.
6
Deep dyslexia in childhood?儿童期深度阅读障碍?
Brain Lang. 1985 Sep;26(1):16-27. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(85)90025-2.
7
Routes to reading: a report of a non-semantic reader with equivalent performance on regular and exception words.阅读路径:关于一位对规则词和例外词表现相当的非语义阅读者的报告
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(13):1473-84. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00028-8.
8
Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for output: evidence from a category-specific semantic deficit.用于输出的词汇表征获取机制:来自特定类别语义缺陷的证据。
Brain Lang. 1991 Jan;40(1):106-44. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(91)90119-l.
9
The effect of syntax on reading in neglect dyslexia.句法对忽视性诵读困难症阅读的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Aug;49(10):2803-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.023. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
10
Phonological reading: phenomena and paradoxes.语音阅读:现象与悖论
Cortex. 1986 Sep;22(3):359-80. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(86)80002-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating semantic control with transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review with meta-analysis.经颅磁刺激评估语义控制:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 9;15:1435338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1435338. eCollection 2024.
2
What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.我们所说的语义是什么意思:迈向一个多学科语义词汇表。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):243-280. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
Assessing naming errors using an automated machine learning approach.
使用自动化机器学习方法评估命名错误。
Neuropsychology. 2022 Nov;36(8):709-718. doi: 10.1037/neu0000860. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
4
Semantic flow and its relation to controlled semantic retrieval deficits in the narrative production of people with aphasia.语义流及其与失语症患者叙事产生中受控语义检索缺陷的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jun 6;170:108235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108235. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
Evaluating a Maintenance-Based Treatment Approach to Preventing Lexical Dropout in Progressive Anomia.评估基于维持治疗的方法预防进行性命名障碍中的词汇丢失。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):4082-4095. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00059. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
On Simulating Neural Damage in Connectionist Networks.关于在联结主义网络中模拟神经损伤
Comput Brain Behav. 2020;3(3):289-321. doi: 10.1007/s42113-020-00081-z. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Evaluating the distinction between semantic knowledge and semantic access: Evidence from semantic dementia and comprehension-impaired stroke aphasia.评估语义知识和语义访问之间的区别:来自语义痴呆和理解障碍性中风失语症的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Aug;27(4):607-639. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01706-6.
8
Naming and Knowing Revisited: Eyetracking Correlates of Anomia in Progressive Aphasia.再探命名与认知:进行性失语症中命名障碍的眼动追踪关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Oct 11;13:354. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00354. eCollection 2019.
9
White-matter pathways and semantic processing: intrasurgical and lesion-symptom mapping evidence.白质通路与语义处理:术中与病灶-症状映射的证据。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101704. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101704. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
10
A Neuropsychological Perspective on Abstract Word Representation: From Theory to Treatment of Acquired Language Disorders.抽象词表征的神经心理学视角:从后天性语言障碍的理论到治疗
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Sep;16(9):79. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0683-0.