Kiil J, Andersen D, Jensen O M
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1979;14(2):189-91. doi: 10.3109/00365527909179868.
In a prospective study the diagnostic value of biopsy and that of brush cytology in the diagnosis of gastric cancer were compared. The patients included in the study were endoscopied because of upper abdominal dyspepsia. When the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa suggested malignancy, and in all cases in which ulcerations were seen, brush cytological smear and at least five biopsies were obtained. The cytology and the biopsy specimens were assessed by two different pathologists in a mutual blind fashion. If the result of the examination suggested or showed the presence of cancer, it was considered positive. The results were evaluated by means of sequential analysis. When 195 examinations had been included in the study, disagreement had occurred in 8 cases, in all of which the biopsy was verified as correct. This difference is significant. In 187 cases the result of the 2 tests were in agreement, but in 3 cases the result of both tests were falsely negative. It was concluded that no diagnostic advantage was gained by the addition of brush cytology to endoscopic biopsy.
在一项前瞻性研究中,对活检和刷片细胞学检查在胃癌诊断中的诊断价值进行了比较。纳入该研究的患者因上腹部消化不良接受了内镜检查。当黏膜的内镜表现提示恶性肿瘤时,以及在所有观察到溃疡的病例中,均获取了刷片细胞学涂片和至少五份活检样本。细胞学和活检标本由两位不同的病理学家以相互盲法进行评估。如果检查结果提示或显示存在癌症,则视为阳性。结果通过序贯分析进行评估。当该研究纳入195例检查时,出现了8例分歧,所有这些病例中活检结果被证实是正确的。这种差异具有显著性。在187例中,两项检查结果一致,但在3例中,两项检查结果均为假阴性。得出的结论是,在内镜活检基础上增加刷片细胞学检查并无诊断优势。