Suppr超能文献

The reliability of coronary angiogram interpretation: an angiographic-pathologic correlation with a comparison of radiographic views.

作者信息

Murphy M L, Galbraith J E, de Soyza N

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1979 May;97(5):578-84. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(79)90184-4.

Abstract

This prospective study correlates premortem coronary angiographic interpretation with pathologic findings including the use of postmortem coronary angiograms. The reliability of a single radiographic view, left anterior oblique or right anterior oblique, or combined views (left anterior oblique plus right anterior oblique) was examined. The most reliable interpretation, the combined view, has a specificity of 93 per cent, but sensitivity is less at 61 per cent. Using a single view enhances diagnosis (sensitivity), but it leads to overestimation more frequently (decreased specificity). Proximal segments of the coronary arteries are prone to a significant per cent of false positive readings. The most accurate assessment of the anterior descending coronary artery system occurs with the use of the right anterior oblique with multiple views. Less routine use of the left anterior oblique view with increased use of the hemiaxial view is suggested for the angiography of the left coronary artery. Initial cusp injections of the right coronary artery may avoid a high per cent of false positive readings in the proximal segment.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验