Smith S E, Smith S A, Friedmann A I, Chaston J M
Br J Ophthalmol. 1979 Apr;63(4):228-32. doi: 10.1136/bjo.63.4.228.
Twelve patients with chronic simple glaucoma were treated for 1 week with Ocusert-40, and the effects on the pupil, intraocular pressure, and refraction were measured. A comparison was made with the effects of pilocarpine eyedrop therapy in 8 of these patients. Both forms of pilocarpine treatment gave satisfactory control of intraocular pressure and both constricted the pupil to a similar degree shortly after initiation of treatment. During the week on Ocusert-40 the pupils redilated, so that 54% of the initial miosis remained after 7 days' wear. There was, however, considerable variability in the pupillary sensitivity to Ocusert-40 within and between eyes, and it is suggested that this may have been partly due to variable release rates of pilocarpine. Only minor decreases in visual acuity and refraction resulted from pilocarpine in either form. Seven of the 12 patients rejected Ocusert-40 because of discomfort or inability to retain the device.
12例慢性单纯性青光眼患者使用Ocusert - 40治疗1周,测量其对瞳孔、眼压和屈光的影响。并对其中8例患者使用毛果芸香碱滴眼液治疗的效果进行了比较。两种毛果芸香碱治疗方式均能令人满意地控制眼压,且在治疗开始后不久,两种方式使瞳孔缩小的程度相似。在使用Ocusert - 40的一周内,瞳孔重新散大,佩戴7天后,最初瞳孔缩小程度仅剩下54%。然而,眼内和两眼之间对Ocusert - 40的瞳孔敏感性存在相当大的差异,提示这可能部分归因于毛果芸香碱释放速率的不同。两种形式的毛果芸香碱治疗仅导致视力和屈光有轻微下降。12例患者中有7例因不适或无法保留该装置而拒绝使用Ocusert - 40。