Mattox K L, Allen M K, Feliciano D V
JACEP. 1979 May;8(5):180-3. doi: 10.1016/s0361-1124(79)80122-7.
Reports of advancements in emergency department operative resuscitative skills have included craniotomy, thoracotomy, cardiorrhaphy and even cardiopulmonary bypass. The efficacy and advisability of laparotomy in the emergency department remain in question. Between July, 1972, and July, 1977, adhering to an established protocol, resuscitative laparotomy was performed on 51 patients in the emergency department. All 51 patients underwent emergency thoracotomy also. Twenty-four patients were victims of gunshot wounds, 24 had sustained blunt trauma, and three had abdominal stab wounds. Injuries to the liver, major vessels, and spleen were most common. Control of hemorrhage by clamps, packs or pressure was the primary objective of laparotomy. Control of exsanguinating hemorrhage with precise application of vascular clamps was possible in all but 15 patients. Because of extensive multiple injuries and inability to achieve cardiovascular stability, only 11 patients reached the operating room, and none survived to leave the hospital. Although technically possible, laparotomy in the emergency center did not alter the fatal outcome of moribund patients in this series.
关于急诊科手术复苏技能进展的报告包括开颅手术、开胸手术、心脏缝合术甚至体外循环。急诊科剖腹手术的有效性和可取性仍存在疑问。在1972年7月至1977年7月期间,按照既定方案,对急诊科的51例患者进行了复苏性剖腹手术。所有51例患者也都接受了急诊开胸手术。24例患者为枪伤受害者,24例遭受钝器伤,3例为腹部刺伤。肝脏、大血管和脾脏损伤最为常见。通过夹子、填塞物或压迫控制出血是剖腹手术的主要目标。除15例患者外,所有患者都能够通过精确应用血管夹控制大出血。由于多处广泛损伤且无法实现心血管稳定,只有11例患者被送往手术室,无一例存活出院。尽管在技术上可行,但在本系列中,急诊中心的剖腹手术并未改变濒死患者的致命结局。