Suppr超能文献

农药致癌数据及监管方法综述。

Review of pesticide carcinogenesis data and regulatory approaches.

作者信息

Saffiotti U

出版信息

IARC Sci Publ (1971). 1979(25):151-66.

PMID:457150
Abstract

Carcinogenicity data are presented for compounds used as pesticides which have been evaluated in the IARC Monograph series. These pesticides have been both poorly and scantily tested for carcinogenicity. Additional tests have been carried out under the NCI Carcinogenesis Program, and detailed results of the bioassays are published in the NCI Carcinogenesis Technical Report Series. A prpcedure was developed whereby 'preliminary reports' could be made in the Federal Register. In the second part of the paper, regulatory approaches to pesticides are described. International activities are outlined; and examples are given of factors, such as public concern, scientific work and governmental response, which are highlights in the development of approaches to such regulations. The problem of risk assessment has been approached from many sides but remains largely unsolved. Besides risks and benefits, an essential component in evaluation is the analysis of technological alternatives. Two other factors are public documentation of the process of evaluation and registration of environmental carcinogens and their uses. Reduction of exposure to environmental carcinogens to a 'minimum feasible level' depends on social, economic and temporal factors and implies the acceptance of a finite level of risk.

摘要

本文给出了国际癌症研究机构(IARC)专论系列中已评估的用作农药的化合物的致癌性数据。这些农药的致癌性测试做得既少又不充分。美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)致癌作用项目开展了额外的测试,生物测定的详细结果发表在《NCI致癌作用技术报告系列》中。已制定了一种程序,据此可在《联邦公报》上发布“初步报告”。在本文的第二部分,描述了针对农药的监管方法。概述了国际活动,并列举了诸如公众关注、科学工作和政府回应等因素的例子,这些因素是此类监管方法制定过程中的重点。风险评估问题已从多个方面进行探讨,但在很大程度上仍未解决。除了风险和益处外,评估中的一个重要组成部分是对技术替代方案的分析。另外两个因素是环境致癌物及其用途评估和注册过程的公开记录。将接触环境致癌物降低到“最低可行水平”取决于社会、经济和时间因素,并意味着接受一定程度的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验