Lehman R A, Chelune G J, Heaton R K
J Clin Psychol. 1979 Apr;35(2):358-63. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197904)35:2<358::aid-jclp2270350227>3.0.co;2-i.
Compared non-specific variability across subtests and overall level of performance on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Halstead-Reitan Battery (HRB) for normal, schizophrenic, acute and chronic brain-damaged Ss. Both variability and level of performance measures for each of the two test batteries significantly distinguished normal from abnormal Ss, but the HRB measures were more sensitive. Intra-S variability across subtests had a significant negative correlation with level of performance on the HRB, but not on the WAIS. This correlation could not be accounted for fully by a ceiling effect and was thought to represent in part a characteristic feature of ts performance on the HRB. While WAIS variability appeared to be independent of level of performance, it was not much help in differentiating between the four S groups. It was concluded that non-specific variability across subtests is not a helpful independent measure of neuropsychological function on the two batteries studied.
比较了正常、精神分裂症、急性和慢性脑损伤受试者在韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)和霍尔斯特德-雷坦成套测验(HRB)各分测验中的非特异性变异性以及总体表现水平。两个测验组合中每个组合的变异性和表现水平指标都能显著区分正常受试者和异常受试者,但HRB指标更敏感。HRB各分测验内的受试者间变异性与HRB的表现水平呈显著负相关,但与WAIS无关。这种相关性不能完全由天花板效应来解释,部分被认为代表了受试者在HRB上表现的一个特征。虽然WAIS变异性似乎与表现水平无关,但在区分四个受试者组方面帮助不大。得出的结论是,在研究的两个测验组合中,各分测验的非特异性变异性不是一个有助于独立衡量神经心理功能的指标。