Wilson J M
J Clin Pathol. 1973 Aug;26(8):555-63. doi: 10.1136/jcp.26.8.555.
Automation in clinical chemistry is a powerful tool. Like most innovations it is posing many questions as well as resolving some. Its use in population screening has led to questioning the validity of the old system of ;normal values' and to the search for better methods of indicating the significance of laboratory tests. This in itself is likely to have a good effect in that it is leading to a rigorous examination of the clinical value in diagnosis of the ever increasing number of laboratory tests.The ease and cheapness with which laboratory screening can be carried out is in itself a danger; it can readily lead to an increasingly large diagnostic effort but diminishing returns, including some inconvenience or even harm to a fair proportion of the people screened. It is, therefore, important to examine thoroughly, through population surveys and intervention studies, the validity of all novel forms of prescriptive screening, including those of clinical chemistry. Cheapness of testing needs to be examined in the wider context of the overall cost-effectiveness of screening.
临床化学自动化是一项强大的工具。与大多数创新一样,它在解决一些问题的同时也带来了许多问题。其在人群筛查中的应用引发了对旧的“正常值”系统有效性的质疑,并促使人们寻找更好的方法来表明实验室检测结果的意义。这本身可能会产生良好的效果,因为它促使人们对越来越多的实验室检测在诊断中的临床价值进行严格审查。实验室筛查操作简便且成本低廉,这本身就是一种危险;它很容易导致诊断工作日益繁重但回报却不断减少,包括给相当一部分受筛查者带来一些不便甚至伤害。因此,通过人群调查和干预研究彻底检验所有新型规定性筛查形式的有效性,包括临床化学筛查,至关重要。检测成本低廉需要在筛查总体成本效益的更广泛背景下进行审视。