Scott D F, Whiteside D, Redhead J, Atkins R C
Br Med J. 1974 Oct 12;4(5936):76-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5936.76.
The results of simple ice storage and prolonged perfusion storage of kidneys were compared in two series, each of 100 cadaver kidney transplants. There was a similar warm ischaemia time for both groups, but the average total storage time was 17 hours for the perfused kidneys as compared to three and a half hours for those stored in ice. The results of transplantation (as shown by transplant function at three and 12 months) were the same for both groups. There was no evidence of damage due to prolonged perfusion. The extra time, however, enabled a more convenient operation time to be chosen and more extensive tissue matching to be undertaken.
在两个系列中对肾脏单纯冰储存和延长灌注储存的结果进行了比较,每个系列有100例尸体肾移植。两组的热缺血时间相似,但灌注肾的平均总储存时间为17小时,而冰储存的肾为三个半小时。两组的移植结果(如3个月和12个月时的移植功能所示)相同。没有证据表明延长灌注会造成损伤。然而,额外的时间使得能够选择更方便的手术时间,并进行更广泛的组织配型。