Suppr超能文献

欧洲五个实验室对检测猪旋毛虫感染的三种方法的比较。

Comparison of three methods for the detection of Trichinella spiralis infections in pigs by five European laboratories.

作者信息

Kohler G, Ruitenberg E J

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 1974;50(5):413-9.

Abstract

Three methods employed in the diagnosis of trichinosis (trichinoscopy, digestion method, and immunofluorescence technique) were compared by laboratories in 5 countries of the European economic community. For this purpose, material from 32 pigs infected with 50, 150, 500, and 1 500 T. spiralis larvae was examined. With none of the three methods was it possible to detect with sufficient reliability a T. spiralis infection in pigs infected with 50 larvae. The digestion method and the immunofluorescence technique yielded more reliable results when the infection dose was 150 larvae or more. With trichinoscopy, reliable results were obtained in pigs infected with 500 and 1 500 larvae. With the digestion method and trichinoscopy, the onset of infections was detectable from 3 weeks post infection, the digestion method being more reliable; the immunofluorescence technique yielded positive results from approximately 4-6 weeks post infection. The immunofluorescence technique is applicable for epidemiological surveys. As a routine diagnostic procedure in the slaughterhouse, trichinoscopy and the digestion method are possible alternatives, the latter being more sensitive.

摘要

欧洲经济共同体5个国家的实验室对旋毛虫病诊断中采用的三种方法(旋毛虫镜检法、消化法和免疫荧光技术)进行了比较。为此,对感染了50、150、500和1500条旋毛虫幼虫的32头猪的材料进行了检查。对于感染50条幼虫的猪,这三种方法均无法足够可靠地检测出旋毛虫感染。当感染剂量为150条幼虫或更多时,消化法和免疫荧光技术产生的结果更可靠。采用旋毛虫镜检法时,感染500条和1500条幼虫的猪可获得可靠结果。采用消化法和旋毛虫镜检法时,感染后3周可检测到感染的开始,消化法更可靠;免疫荧光技术在感染后约4 - 6周产生阳性结果。免疫荧光技术适用于流行病学调查。作为屠宰场的常规诊断程序,旋毛虫镜检法和消化法是可行的替代方法,后者更敏感。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验